So several months ago it was highlighted that some felt my blog postings were anti-iskcon an interesting notation coming from a closed conversation were I was not given even a trial or right to reply.
interesting given my blog and social media outlets allow the right to reply and although i may not agree with the individuals point of view that this is alright indeed to disagree but still get on is not always a bad thing.
it does however highlighted the sensitivity when it comes to social media and commets whilst revealing the mind of some of the readers and so I want to clarify a few points.
1) This is a personal blog it is representitive of my mind and my own faulty understandings
2) You do have a right to reply and we can agree to disagree or hold views that are diverse this is healthy and productive
3) I do like the concept of mentorship but not in it’s current form
4) I do like and agree with some of the precepts of what is now called Krishna west (we need many valid paths to make the whole world Krishna conscious)
5) Yes I do make mistakes and get things wrong.
However I take exception at being labled anti-iskcon for even in my working life outside of Iskcon I don’t have to agree with my boss unless we are saying that no one can hold or say anything unless they agree or toe a party line.
So ending on a question, is disagreeing an anti-iskcon traight?