By Bhakti Niskama Shanta
The archaeological record is very limited and its analysis has been contentious. Hence, molecular biologists have shifted their attention to molecular dating techniques. Recently on April 2013, the prestigious Cell Press Journal Current Biology published an article (Fu et al. 2013) entitled “A Revised Timescale for Human Evolution Based on Ancient Mitochondrial Genomes”. This paper has twenty authors and they are researchers from the world’s top institutes like Max Planck Institute, Harvard, etc. Respected authors of this paper have emphatically accepted that the fossil record is inadequate and unreliable. These statements clearly substantiate that now biologists are agreeing that fossil records do not provide any significant evidence at all for conventional evolution theory. Despite the well-recorded fact of the continual grand propaganda of Darwinism based on fossil evidence for more than 150 years, in recent times biologists are surprisingly coming up with such statements, based on their confidence that evolution can be explained purely by the genealogical/genomic record provided by modern molecular biology.
By Govinda prema das
By Mina Sharma
By Radha Bhakti devi dasi
By Kumari Sherreitt
By Yasoda devi dasi
By Madhavendra Puri dasa
By Sutapa das
By Basu Ghosh Das
By Romapada Swami
By Manu Shah
By Urmila Devi Dasi
By Nrsimha Krsna das
By Samapriya devi dasi
By Anand caitanya dasa
By Urmila devi dasi
By radhanathswami.com
By Mahatma Das
By Madhava Smullen
By Devaprastha das
By Krishna-kripa das
By Chandan Yatra Das
By Manu Shah
By Kumari Kunti Dasi
By Jay Cheshes
By Nimai Lila das
By Vijaya Dasa
By radhanathswami.com