Prabhupada Letters :: Anthology 2014-06-10 04:39:00 →
Prabhupada Letters :: 1974
Websites from the ISKCON Universe
This talk is a part of the "Fascinating Mahabharata Characters" series. To know more about this course, please visit: bhakticourses.com
BY ISKCON GBC
MAYAPUR - Whereas there is a need to recognize as general members those who wish to identify with the spiritual family of ISKCON,
Whereas such recognition should include some basic parameters,
Whereas such recognition should not involve any legal rights for the general members,
RESOLVED:
Whoever, regardless of gender, race, nationality, religion, etc., subscribes to the following statement, shall be considered a general member of ISKCON:
“I wish to be counted as part of the spiritual family of the International Society for Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON), and I will practically support its mission. I accept the teachings of Lord Krishna as presented by His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, Founder-Acarya of ISKCON.
“While I understand that this general membership does not confer upon me any rights in ISKCON organizations, I am grateful to participate in this spiritual movement intended for the upliftment of the entire human society.”

(Kadamba Kanana Swami, 08 April 2014, Cape Town, South Africa, Rama Naumi Initiation Lecture)
There exists our internal life. One cannot just be fixed on dharma by determination,”Okay, by intelligence I have understood this philosophy. It makes sense and I am deeply impressed by it. I think it is the truth. I think I am going to adjust my life to it.’ That is intellectual, it is very nice but that still is a burden.
So, one must also have an internal life. Give mercy and go and collect it. Dig deep in the scriptures because in the scriptures, there are amazing descriptions of amazing personalities. Chant, chant the name of the Lord, that name is unlimited. Invest energy, do not chant mechanical, really chant it. Everyday, chant at the best time. Chant the best rounds; make something out of that chanting! That is the internal life.
We must have both, internal life and quality. Otherwise, if it waters down then suddenly, the vows become a burden. If we are not having an internal life then the vows become a burden and then our so-called merciful activities become superficial, just to show! How can you have compassion for others when you do not have a better quality of life? You can only have compassion when you have a better quality of life otherwise you can be like an actor on stage and act as if you are compassionate. Real compassion is only possible when we have a better quality of life ourselves, then it is natural. So we must endeavour for that and rewards will come.
“O King, for devotees who hold a festival in glorification of the Lord, the Lord holds a festival for them at the very same moment in Goloka Vrindavan.”
[ Padma Purana, quoted in Bhakti Rasamrta Sindhi 1.2.220 ]
yah karoti mahipala
harer gehe mahotsavam
tasyapi bhavati nitya
hari loke mahotsava Read more › [podcast title="Answer Podcast"]http://www.thespiritualscientist.com/audio/CCD%20QA/2014%20QA/06-14%20QA/What%20does%20the%20identification%20of%20Krishna%20with%20time%20mean%20practically.mp3[/podcast]
With Bhaktivikasa Swami Read more › 
Hare Krishna!
My first contact with the devotees, without even noticing it, was with the George Harrison’s song “My Sweet Lord”. It was a #1 Hit in Spain and I loved it. I bought the LP and I listened to it everytime I could. I was 14 years old.
At 17, when I finished my studies, I decided to go to Paris and just by life chances, I ended up living close to the Hare Krishna Temple. It was in the Rue le Sueur, next to the park where I was going every day with the little girl I was taking care of. During the two years I was there I could see them quite often, but I never went to the temple. It seems it wasn’t my time yet.
I came back to Spain and I had to go through a couple of years of suffering to realize that this life is not made to enjoy it. At the beginning of ’82 a Srila Prabhupada book, “Elevation to Krishna Concioussnes” arrived to my home. Years after I discovered that during these Christmas there was a Ladies Sankirtan Party who did a Marathon in Bilbao, near to where I was living, and probably someone from my family bought them that book. When I first saw it I loved it, especially the Srila Prabhupada picture, to which I started to offer incense (in my way, of course). I built a little altar and I even put a little cactus. I liked the book so much, and I started trying to follow the principles Srila Prabhupada was mentioning.
A bit later I found out that a friend of mine was living in New Vrajamandala and during Eastern I went there to see the farm. I loved it so much that I had to stay, I couldn’t go back home.
One month after arriving to the farm, I joined the ladies Travelling Sankirtana Party and we travelled all around Spain. Later on, in the ’87, I got married with Sabda-Brahma and we lived for 5 years more in New Vrajamandala, until we moved to Jalón, in Alicante, where we are still living with our son Nityananda.
Here we have a prosper devotee community quite near, wich helps us to stay Krishna conscious, and without the London Temple morning programs, it wouldn’t be the same. Mayapur.tv has brought back to me enthusiasm for participating in this marvelous Srila Prabhupada movement. There I have met great devotees from all over the world, who like me are willing to please Krishna. We are a big family, and this makes me feel very motivated.
Thank you very much for giving me this opportunity to share my life with you all. See you in the next London program. Haribol!
Like to do a devotional course but not physically near a temple? Then you may like what Bhaktivedanta College has to offer:
http://bcoc.bhaktivedantacollege.com/
Check it out!
The post Ganga Puja Gallery appeared first on Mayapur.com.

With Dayanidhi prabhu, Jagadisha prabhu, Vrikodhara prabhu and all the blissful vaishnavas of Tel Aviv Iskcon yatra. Read more › The post Discussion with devotee guests from Europe on the founding and development of Krsna Valley (Part 2) appeared first on SivaramaSwami.com.
Q: Is there śāstric evidence for the understanding that Krishna is the original Bhagavān, the source of Viṣṇu, aside from the commonly quoted Śrīmad Bhāgavatam 1.3.28 and Brahmā Saṁhitā 5.1?
I think the first thing to remember here is that Krishna is a very rare avatāra. He is 1,000 times more rare than any other Viṣṇu Avatāra (Because they appear once per kalpa, but Krishna appears only once in an entire day of Brahmā — 1,000 kalpa). And every time Krishna appears, he is immediately followed by Śrī Krishna Caitanya and his associates, especially Śrīla Rūpa Goswāmī and Śrīla Jīva Goswāmī, etc.
So for 95% of the duration of the cosmos, Krishna is rather irrelevant. He is not known except by those very rare mystics whose knowledge extends beyond the beginning of the current cosmos. Therefore in the vast majority of śāstra Krishna is not directly discussed. Simply put, he is irrelevant to most of the material world, and even most of the spiritual progress going on within the material world, for the vast majority of the time.
But when, just after the 500th revolution of kalpa, at the very end of the dvāpara-yuga, Krishna appears… all of the sudden he becomes exceedingly relevant in this world, although for a short time on a cosmic scale. Krishna is like a flash of lightning or a supernova, very rare, and when it happens it is over very quickly, but while it happens… oh boy is it bright and exciting!
After Krishna appears Vyāsa records his līlā in Bhāgavata Purāṇa. Then there is a period of slight pause, and then Mahaprabhu Arrives with his associates to completely explain Krishna and open a huge doorway for almost anyone and everyone to access the beauty of the Bhāgavata Purāṇa and its object.
So, what I am saying is that most of the time Krishna is irrelevant to the world, and therefore most of the scripture doesn’t deal directly with Krishna. But when Krishna does come, once in 1,000 kalpa he is followed immediately by associates who generate śāstra relevant to his revelation.
So, the words of Mahaprabhu, the words of Kaviraja Goswāmī, the words of Śrī Rūpa, Sanatana, Raghunātha and Jīva Goswāmī… these are equal to and superior to the words of the Sāptaṛṣi who composed the ancient vedas, and the words of the other ṛṣī who composed Upanishads and so on. We do not agree to the idea that simply because something is not extremely old, its not authentic. The relatively modern texts of Śrī Rūpa and Śrī Jīva, for example, are superior to the Purāṇas, Upanishads, and Vedas – because they were written during the “supernova” of Krishna’s revelation.
In the very old Vedas, there is still indication of Krishna but it is indirect. In other words, he is not mentioned much by name, but is regularly pointed to as an ideal.
Two classic, important, examples are
(1) the Vedanta’s analysis of the Upanishads, stating ānanda-mayābhyāsāt — “The Upanishads repeatedly declare that the ultimate life is composed of bliss itself.”
(2) Taittiriya Upanishad, stating raso vai saḥ — “The supreme is certainly rasa himself.”
So, the Upanishads (which bring out the philosophical import of the four Veda) repeatedly point to bliss / rasa as the true essence of life – and that is really what the Krishna conception is. Krishna is the supreme life, and thus the supreme rasa, the supreme bliss. So our ācāryas, like Madhvācārya, confidently say, “All the Vedas glorify Krishna.” And even Krishna says, in Gītā, vedaiś ca sarvair ahaṁ eva vedyo — “The real thing to be known in all the Vedas is me.”
Madhvācārya says (in commenting on Gītā 2.24), that the older Vedic scriptures can be most clearly understood for what they really are pointing towards only if we study them in light of the newer scriptures (especially the Gītā. In Bhagavad Gītā, several statements support that Krishna is Bhagavān and even svayam Bhagavān.)
In this way, we are quite content with the 3rd chapter of canto 1 of Śrīmad Bhāgavata Purāṇa (which elaborately and explicitly makes the point that Krishna is svayam Bhagavān, and the origin of all avatar), and with the Brahmā Samhita discovered by Śrī Krishna Caitanya, and with the statements of Mahaprabhu and the Six Goswāmīs.
Here are a few more instances of indirect descriptions of Krishna in the Upaniṣads:
The essential declaration that the supreme is an entity possessing personality, and desire to expand (the root nature of Krishna) is made all across the Upaniṣad. For example: Chāndogya Upaniṣad (6.2.1):
sadeva saumyedam agra āsīd ekam evādvitīyam
tad aikṣata bahu syām prajāyeya
“In the beginning the One was certainly undivided, and desired to manifest as many.”
Aitareya Upaniṣad (1.1-2):
ātmā vā idam eka evāgra āsīn nānyat kiñcana miṣat
sa īkṣata lokān nu sṛjā
“In the beginning there was certainly only one entity, and nothing else. He desired to manifest all things.”
The Gītā declares in many places that Krishna is Bhagavān, who is defined as the origin of Brahman. For example (Bhagavad Gītā 14.27): brahmaṇo hi pratiṣṭhāhaṁ – “I am certainly the very foundation of reality (Brahman).”
A later Upaniṣad, Gopāl Tāpanī Upaniṣad (Pūrva 50), mentions Krishna by name:
tasmāt kṛṣṇa eva paro devaḥ
“Therefore the supreme divinity is certainly all-attractive (Krishna).”
Q: Should we preach the Krishna conception to those who have other understandings of Bhagavān.
Our natural function, being enamored with Krishna, is that we will speak about Krishna. Much like school boys talk about the various girls in bands like AKB48, and the school girls talk about the various boys in bands like One Direction, or whatever. It is just natural that we will gush about Krishna.
We do not “preach” per se, it is just natural that when we open our mouths, what is in our hearts comes out.
You cannot “make” someone a devotee of Krishna, or a devotee at all. You can only hope to inspire them to make themselves a devotee. Love cannot be created, it comes only from freewill, so we cannot create bhakti in someone else. We can only inspire them to create it within themselves.
If someone is inspired to be a devotee of Narasiṁha, Varāha, Rāma, Viṣṇu, etc. then your expression of love for Krishna will only inspire their affection for Narasiṁha, Varāha, etc. Similarly, if one is inspired to be a devotee of Krishna, then expressions of devotion for Rāma and so on, will only inspire their inspiration towards Krishna.
Śrīla Rūpa and Sanātana Goswāmīs were brothers. They had a third brother, and his son was Jīva Goswāmī. This third brother was a devotee of Rāma. Śrīla Rūpa and Sanātana could not interest him in becoming a devotee of Krishna.
Sometimes it will happen, because sometimes the soul will be inspired. But usually it won’t happen because the soul is already fixed in its inspiration.
There is no need to make the effort, in my opinion.
Krsna has one personal energy called svarupa sakti or para sakti. This para sakti has three vibhavas, three prabhavas and three anubhavas by Krsna's will. The three vibhavas are the cit sakti, jiva sakti and maya sakti. The three prabhavas are the iccha sakti, kriya sakti and jnana sakti. The three anubhavas are sandhini, hladini and samvit. By the influence of the iccha sakti (Supreme Will), the cit sakti manifests Goloka, Vaikuntha and other places of the Lord's pastimes, Krsna's names, the Lord's various two handed or four handed or six handed forms, the pastimes with his associates in Goloka, Vrndavana, and Vaikuntha, and spiritual qualities such as mercy, forgiveness, and generosity. By the influence of the jnana sakti, the cit sakti produces various perceptions: aisvarya, madhurya, and beauty of the spiritual world. Krsna alone possesses the iccha sakti. The controller of the jnana sakti is Vasudeva and the controller of the kriya sakti is Baladeva, or Sankarsana. By the influence of the iccha sakti, jnana sakti and kriya sakti upon the jiva sakti, the forms of eternal associates, devatas, men, demons and raksasas appear. By the influence of Krsna's kriya sakti, the Lord's activities become manifest. Within the cit sakti, the sandhini, samvit and hladini saktis combine to produce the distinctive ecstasies of prema.
Chaitanya Shikshamrita, Bhaktivinoda Thakura
Sri Radha Beautiful Darshans HD
This talk is a part of the "Fascinating Mahabharata Characters" series. To know more about this course, please visit: bhakticourses.com
- Chaitanya Charan das and Sukadeva das, PhD
"Vegetarians are unhealthier than non-vegetarians." So claimed a recent study:
http://atlanta.cbslocal.com/2014/04/01/study-vegetarians-less-healthy-lower- quality-of-life-than-meat-eaters/
The article stated: “Vegetarians were twice as likely to have allergies, a 50 percent increase in heart attacks and a 50 percent increase in incidences of cancer. The cross-sectional study from Austrian Health Interview Survey data and published in PLos One examined participants dietary habits, demographic characteristics and general lifestyle differences.”
At the bottom of the ladder of credibility
What this article didn’t care to mention was the significance of the term “cross-sectional study.” Most readers would probably pass over the technical sounding term, assuming it to be something that indicates credibility and reliability. Their assumption couldn’t be further from the truth. Researchers, especially in the medical and health fields, have a variety of studies of different levels of reliability; and in that hierarchy, cross-sectional studies fall somewhere near the bottom.
A quick analysis of some of the problems of the studies lower in the hierarchy is as follows:
Fletcher et al - http://www.amazon.com/Clinical-Epidemiology-Essentials-Robert-Fletcher/dp/B00D9TDLT6
Readers interested in learning more about this hierarchy of evidences can refer here for an introductory analysis http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hierarchy_of_evidence
or here for a more technical analysis
http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/118/16/1675.full
For those who are not into the technical stuff, the simple point is that this study, being none-too-reliable, needs to be taken with due skepticism.
More reliable studies confirm the health benefits of vegetarianism
And an even greater reason for skepticism is that this study is contradicted by many studies of a far higher level of reliability, as can be seen by a quick search of the relevant medical literature. Here are a
A systematic review published in the Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism found that vegetarians have a significantly lower ischemic heart disease mortality (29%) and overall cancer incidence (18%) than nonvegetarians.
A systematic review published in the Journal of the American Dietetic Association reported that vegetarians have lower risk of death from ischemic heart disease, lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, lower blood pressure, and lower rates of hypertension and type 2 diabetes, lower body mass index and lower overall cancer rates than nonvegetarians. Additionally, contradicting the popular myth that vegetarian diets are nutritionally inadequate, the study reported that appropriately planned vegetarian diets are healthful and nutritionally adequate for individuals during all stages of the life cycle, including pregnancy, lactation, infancy, childhood, and adolescence, and for athletes.
A randomized control trial published in the Journal of the American Dietic Association found that a very-low-fat vegan diet increases intake of protective nutrients that combat several chronic diseases and minimizes intake of dietary factors implicated in several chronic diseases.
A randomized control trial published by Cancer Research confirmed that red meat enhances the colonic formation of the DNA adduct O6-carboxymethyl guanine, thereby reiterating the well-known association of red meat with colorectal cancer.
Readers who prefer a non-technical analysis can the various benefits of vegetarianism – health being just one of them – summarized in an acronym: HELP: Health, Environment, Livestock, Poor.
http://www.thespiritualscientist.com/2012/01/are-there-any-logical-reasons-to-choose-vegetarianism/
The overall verdict of scientific research confirms the time-tested wisdom of the Vedic spiritual tradition: we are meant primarily to be vegetarians.
Lecture Outline: