Planet ISKCON

I know Jiu Jitsu.

Back when I was at undergraduate University I really wanted to learn a martial art. I'm not a warrior-type (ksatriya), but I fantasized about being physically powerful. I enthusiastically read up about all kinds of different styles, comparing their advantages and disadvantages, analyzing which was the most powerful, deciding on which to practice. In the end, I concluded that Jiu Jitsu (literally: soft technique) was the best (most lethal) and joined the local university club. I practiced it for four years.

The training involved various throwing, locking and grappling techniques (with a little bit of punching and kicking). For example: I recall nine different ways how to break someone??(TM)s arm, six different ways to break their neck, that kind of thing.

Gradings were intense affairs designed to mimic the high-stress situation of a real life-or-death struggle. Students would first be tired out by physically exhausting technique demonstrations and then put into a situation where they would have to defend against a continuous stream of attackers.

I gradually learnt to be fearless, to keep my cool no matter what the situation and to just keep going, regardless of any pain or exhaustion. Always keep on fighting! Never give up!

Advanced material artists have some realization that they are not the body. Once the body and mind have sufficiently learnt the techniques, they can run on auto-pilot. Fighting becomes automatic. It is a state of meditation. We are not the doer, the outcome is outside of our control; all we have to do is continue trying to execute our duty (note BG 2.47).

Indeed, the samurai warriors of ancient Japan understood this. They knew their fate was pre-determined. They did not care whether they lived or died. They were completely detached.

The way of the warrior (Bushido) teaches this kind of detachment. However, it offers no positive alternative. Once you??(TM)re detached from the body and mind, then what do you do?

The training was gradually taking its toll on my body: continuously bumps, bruises, strained muscles, sore joints, etc. Additionally, as I practiced more and more Krishna consciousness I gradually lost interest in mastering the physical body. There was (and still is) much more pleasure and satisfaction to be had from mantra meditation. It offers attachment to Krishna, while simultaneously detaching me from the body and mind. That is real knowledge!

Nevertheless, I??(TM)m happy I practiced Jiu Jitsu while I did. I??(TM)m pretty rusty now, of course, but certainly more confident and able to hold my own in a fight. I also understand more than ever before that I??(TM)m not the body and not the mind. The soul is where it's at.

A record number of 10 people came to Vedicsoc this week. One guest from last week who was quite skeptical (or so I thought) surprised me by bringing two of her friends along.

However, kundalini-chakra yoga certainly is not everyone??(TM)s cup of tea. Too weird.

I introduced people to the chanting of the pancha-tattva mantra. I was again surprised by how easily everyone picked it up. I practically couldn't get them to stop! The subsequent chanting of the Maha-Mantra was equally powerful.

I picked the first text in Bhagavad-Gita Chapter 13: Nature, the enjoyer and consciousness for the discussion. However, I was really busy and so no time to actually prepare anything. I stumbled a bit trying to explain the difference between the body (field) and consciousness (knower of the field), reading bits of the purport out loud as I went along, but overall didn't think I made much sense. Then, somehow or other, I got into talking about satisfying the senses and desires and so on.

I found that when I suggested that all material pleasure is limited by time people immediately reacted: "oh, you're against enjoyment! No, no, there must be a balance (i.e. all material), live in the real world, we want to enjoy nice thing. Don't take away my enjoyment!"

I had to emphasis the same point three times throughout the session: Krishna consciousness is about spiritual pleasure! This kind of pleasure makes material pleasure pale in comparison. Why drive in an old beaten-up Fiat, if you have a Mercedes in the garage (excluding fuel mileage considerations, of course)? Matter is temporary, spirit is eternal. Why go for the temporary, if there is something so much better to be had?

That seems to be a deep routed fear that many people have regarding any spiritual progress. Will it take away my sense gratification?

Question for the experts (please comment): how to convince people that we are all spirit. Lots of people, of course, accept the new-age notion that we are both matter and consciousness. That is, all is one: body, mind, spirit. How can they understand that matter is not part of their eternal identify?

In the end, I was surprised once again: two guests said they would definitely start chanting one round a day. One guest even bought a hardcover Bhagavad-Gita to take back with him to his home country (Turkey).

A record number of 10 people came to Vedicsoc this week. One guest from last week who was quite skeptical (or so I thought) surprised me by bringing two of her friends along.

However, kundalini-chakra yoga certainly is not everyone??(TM)s cup of tea. Too weird.

I introduced people to the chanting of the pancha-tattva mantra. I was again surprised by how easily everyone picked it up. I practically couldn't get them to stop! The subsequent chanting of the Maha-Mantra was equally powerful.

I picked the first text in Bhagavad-Gita Chapter 13: Nature, the enjoyer and consciousness for the discussion. However, I was really busy and so no time to actually prepare anything. I stumbled a bit trying to explain the difference between the body (field) and consciousness (knower of the field), reading bits of the purport out loud as I went along, but overall didn't think I made much sense. Then, somehow or other, I got into talking about satisfying the senses and desires and so on.

I found that when I suggested that all material pleasure is limited by time people immediately reacted: "oh, you're against enjoyment! No, no, there must be a balance (i.e. all material), live in the real world, we want to enjoy nice thing. Don't take away my enjoyment!"

I had to emphasis the same point three times throughout the session: Krishna consciousness is about spiritual pleasure! This kind of pleasure makes material pleasure pale in comparison. Why drive in an old beaten-up Fiat, if you have a Mercedes in the garage (excluding fuel mileage considerations, of course)? Matter is temporary, spirit is eternal. Why go for the temporary, if there is something so much better to be had?

That seems to be a deep routed fear that many people have regarding any spiritual progress. Will it take away my sense gratification?

Question for the experts (please comment): how to convince people that we are all spirit. Lots of people, of course, accept the new-age notion that we are both matter and consciousness. That is, all is one: body, mind, spirit. How can they understand that matter is not part of their eternal identify?

In the end, I was surprised once again: two guests said they would definitely start chanting one round a day. One guest even bought a hardcover Bhagavad-Gita to take back with him to his home country (Turkey).

I hosted another Saturday Feast yesterday. On the menu:

• Lebanese bulgur-wheat salad
• Spicy Bengali potatoes
• French braised summer vegetables
• Almond basmati rice
• Lemon-yogurt shake/lassi
• Coconut butter cookies

After some chanting we watched the Mysterious Origins of Man documentary. It highlighted some major problems with the Darwinian model of evolution. In particular, it shows very convincing evidence that humans walked the earth long before they were supposed to have evolved.

On that note: today I listen to an interview with Martinez Howlett, author of "Evolution from Creation to New Creation: Conflict, Conversation, and Convergence". He is a roman-catholic and molecular biologist who tries to unify science and theology into "theistic evolution". This philosophy accepts the idea of evolution, but does not accept the "no God" idea of ontological materialism that often gets tagged onto neo/social Darwinist bandwagon. It also rejects fanatical Christian creationism.

In the interview Howlett attempts to answer the age old question of:

"why do good things happen to bad people"
"why do bad things happen to good people"

Most so-called religions tend to have a problem with this. Either God is not powerful enough to do anything about the evil in the world, or God is powerful enough, but chooses not. Either God is weak, or God is evil. Both don't fit well with the Christian idea of the all-powerful, all-merciful God.

Howlett's solution is to claim the creation as described in Genesis is still ongoing. That is: when it says that "God created the world in seven days and saw that it was good", those seven days are not over yet. We're still in the middle of creation and therefore things are still bad. It's up to us to act as co-creators and help the universe evolve to perfection. He takes the idea from the philosophy of Teilhardianism. This philosophy is the brainchild of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, a famous French Jesuit philosopher (speculator).

The Vedic understanding is, of course, that bad things happen to good people, because those "good" people are not nearly as "good" as they believe themselves to be. They have committed sins in their past life and are now suffering the reactions for their activities. Every action has and equal and opposite reaction. So called "bad" things are not evil, they are educational.

The new-age notion that the Universe is evolving to perfection is similarly flawed. Being heavily influenced by Darwin's doctrine, it takes only a very limited view of history. The Vedic literature explains that everything degrades over time. The Universe goes through cycles. There is gradually degradation until things get so bad that there is a (partial) destruction. After that comes a re-creation of near-perfect universal situation, which then, once again, gradually degrades, etc.

The Vedic viewpoint is simple, sensible, scientific and has been around for thousands of years.

I hosted another Saturday Feast yesterday. On the menu:

• Lebanese bulgur-wheat salad
• Spicy Bengali potatoes
• French braised summer vegetables
• Almond basmati rice
• Lemon-yogurt shake/lassi
• Coconut butter cookies

After some chanting we watched the Mysterious Origins of Man documentary. It highlighted some major problems with the Darwinian model of evolution. In particular, it shows very convincing evidence that humans walked the earth long before they were supposed to have evolved.

On that note: today I listen to an interview with Martinez Howlett, author of "Evolution from Creation to New Creation: Conflict, Conversation, and Convergence". He is a roman-catholic and molecular biologist who tries to unify science and theology into "theistic evolution". This philosophy accepts the idea of evolution, but does not accept the "no God" idea of ontological materialism that often gets tagged onto neo/social Darwinist bandwagon. It also rejects fanatical Christian creationism.

In the interview Howlett attempts to answer the age old question of:

"why do good things happen to bad people"
"why do bad things happen to good people"

Most so-called religions tend to have a problem with this. Either God is not powerful enough to do anything about the evil in the world, or God is powerful enough, but chooses not. Either God is weak, or God is evil. Both don't fit well with the Christian idea of the all-powerful, all-merciful God.

Howlett's solution is to claim the creation as described in Genesis is still ongoing. That is: when it says that "God created the world in seven days and saw that it was good", those seven days are not over yet. We're still in the middle of creation and therefore things are still bad. It's up to us to act as co-creators and help the universe evolve to perfection. He takes the idea from the philosophy of Teilhardianism. This philosophy is the brainchild of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, a famous French Jesuit philosopher (speculator).

The Vedic understanding is, of course, that bad things happen to good people, because those "good" people are not nearly as "good" as they believe themselves to be. They have committed sins in their past life and are now suffering the reactions for their activities. Every action has and equal and opposite reaction. So called "bad" things are not evil, they are educational.

The new-age notion that the Universe is evolving to perfection is similarly flawed. Being heavily influenced by Darwin's doctrine, it takes only a very limited view of history. The Vedic literature explains that everything degrades over time. The Universe goes through cycles. There is gradually degradation until things get so bad that there is a (partial) destruction. After that comes a re-creation of near-perfect universal situation, which then, once again, gradually degrades, etc.

The Vedic viewpoint is simple, sensible, scientific and has been around for thousands of years.

6 people attended this week??(TM)s Vedicsoc session. Two new people came because of seeing a poster (probably just to disprove my statement about posters not working from last week).

One of the newcomers (obviously dragged along by her friend) was quite bored throughout the session. Chanting the Maha-Mantra she seemed completely uninterested and lack-luster. The other guest was more enthusiastic about trying this "meditation stuff", smiling ear to ear.

Then however, when it came time for the discussion, things changed somewhat. I spoke about desire. Or, that is to say, I asked the audience questions and let them speak about desire injecting to occasional comment, clarifying the occasional statement and giving hints like: "you know, in Bhagavad-Gita it says this ??¦"

Both new guests were cynical of anything that smelled ever so slightly of the most evil eight-letter word: religion. Not being as expert as my spiritual master I failed to effectively counter some of the folk notions they were expressing. For example:

What??(TM)s wrong with desire? Sure, there are some bad desires, but most of our desires are for good stuff like relationships and success. Why would you want to control them?

(please: if any of the more expert readers of this blog like to comment?)

I made some Tahini Oat cookies for the session (hint: they come out a lot better looking with a nice smoothly textured surface if one forms them into balls with wet hands instead of simply dropping spoonfuls of the batter onto baking sheet).

A large amount of cookies were left over and this remainder was literarily devoured by my office colleagues when I offered it to them on the next day. It seems the combination of golden syrup, cinnamon, tahini and sesame seeds tastes a bit like pork (I didn??(TM)t try them because of my health, so I would not know). My peers kept asking me: "Did you put pork in these cookies?" while reaching for a new cookie every few minutes. "They taste great, but really, no pork?!"

They proceeded to joke about perhaps becoming pigs in their next lives. Mikel admitted to already having a pig-like consciousness and loving it.

Ah, prasadam working its magic ??" though perhaps in a slightly unconventional way.

6 people attended this week??(TM)s Vedicsoc session. Two new people came because of seeing a poster (probably just to disprove my statement about posters not working from last week).

One of the newcomers (obviously dragged along by her friend) was quite bored throughout the session. Chanting the Maha-Mantra she seemed completely uninterested and lack-luster. The other guest was more enthusiastic about trying this "meditation stuff", smiling ear to ear.

Then however, when it came time for the discussion, things changed somewhat. I spoke about desire. Or, that is to say, I asked the audience questions and let them speak about desire injecting to occasional comment, clarifying the occasional statement and giving hints like: "you know, in Bhagavad-Gita it says this ??¦"

Both new guests were cynical of anything that smelled ever so slightly of the most evil eight-letter word: religion. Not being as expert as my spiritual master I failed to effectively counter some of the folk notions they were expressing. For example:

What??(TM)s wrong with desire? Sure, there are some bad desires, but most of our desires are for good stuff like relationships and success. Why would you want to control them?

(please: if any of the more expert readers of this blog like to comment?)

I made some Tahini Oat cookies for the session (hint: they come out a lot better looking with a nice smoothly textured surface if one forms them into balls with wet hands instead of simply dropping spoonfuls of the batter onto baking sheet).

A large amount of cookies were left over and this remainder was literarily devoured by my office colleagues when I offered it to them on the next day. It seems the combination of golden syrup, cinnamon, tahini and sesame seeds tastes a bit like pork (I didn??(TM)t try them because of my health, so I would not know). My peers kept asking me: "Did you put pork in these cookies?" while reaching for a new cookie every few minutes. "They taste great, but really, no pork?!"

They proceeded to joke about perhaps becoming pigs in their next lives. Mikel admitted to already having a pig-like consciousness and loving it.

Ah, prasadam working its magic ??" though perhaps in a slightly unconventional way.

Amusing but sadly so true in today's world:

Original comic site (there is a whole series on this topic)

Amusing but sadly so true in today's world:

Original comic site (there is a whole series on this topic)

A total of seven guests attend last week??(TM)s Vedicsoc session. That is the most that have come in a long time. I attribute this to a new strategy of asking a few long-time members to leave stacks of flyers in various places around the University. Posters don??(TM)t work; people are so oversaturated with advertising that they just ignore them. However, a nice attractive flyer that shows promise of something that a student might be interested in seems to have had some effect.

After a very light (yet grueling to the attendees) slow-deep aerobic session (it seems everyone, and I do mean everyone, in the world has a bad back) we engaged in some chanting of the Hare Krishna maha-mantra. I found it ecstatic, but then again: it is.

We discussed the emptiness that results from inauthenticity: living a lie, pretending to be something you??(TM)re not, pretending to like something you don??(TM)t like, pretending to be happy, or doing something for the wrong reasons all result in a deep feeling of emptiness. Such a feeling leads to a loss of self-respect and vitality. There is no fulfillment! Life is pointless!

I got people to (anonymously) list five ways they are living from the core of their being and five ways they are living from their shell. We then discussed each other??(TM)s lists. Realization: the average New Zealander thinks a lot more deeply about his or her life than the average UK university student.

I got the formula for this session from a one my spiritual master??(TM)s seminar. However, I wasn??(TM)t ultimately as expert as he in was convincing people that there is something beyond trying to satisfy the body. Still, people seemed to like it (and the Chinese vanilla sunflower-seed cookies).

A total of seven guests attend last week??(TM)s Vedicsoc session. That is the most that have come in a long time. I attribute this to a new strategy of asking a few long-time members to leave stacks of flyers in various places around the University. Posters don??(TM)t work; people are so oversaturated with advertising that they just ignore them. However, a nice attractive flyer that shows promise of something that a student might be interested in seems to have had some effect.

After a very light (yet grueling to the attendees) slow-deep aerobic session (it seems everyone, and I do mean everyone, in the world has a bad back) we engaged in some chanting of the Hare Krishna maha-mantra. I found it ecstatic, but then again: it is.

We discussed the emptiness that results from inauthenticity: living a lie, pretending to be something you??(TM)re not, pretending to like something you don??(TM)t like, pretending to be happy, or doing something for the wrong reasons all result in a deep feeling of emptiness. Such a feeling leads to a loss of self-respect and vitality. There is no fulfillment! Life is pointless!

I got people to (anonymously) list five ways they are living from the core of their being and five ways they are living from their shell. We then discussed each other??(TM)s lists. Realization: the average New Zealander thinks a lot more deeply about his or her life than the average UK university student.

I got the formula for this session from a one my spiritual master??(TM)s seminar. However, I wasn??(TM)t ultimately as expert as he in was convincing people that there is something beyond trying to satisfy the body. Still, people seemed to like it (and the Chinese vanilla sunflower-seed cookies).

(by Jayadvaita Swami - Copyright 2005 The Bhaktivedanta Book Trust. www.Krishna.com)

NEW YORK Among alleged tyrants and oppressors, the one the United Demigods now regard as the worst is King Kamsa of Mathura, according to confidential documents made available on Monday to DNS. ??oeHe rules his kingdom with a cruel and brutal hand, he has an extensive and growing network of powerful allies, and his ambitions are global,?? the documents say. ??oeThere??(TM)s no limit to what territory and resources he wants, or what methods he??(TM)ll employ to gain control of them.??

Kamsa??(TM)s kingdom, Mathura, is located in north central India, midway between Delhi and Agra, the site of the Taj Mahal. Mathura is the name of both the kingdom and its capital. Kamsa belongs to what is known as the Bhoja dynasty, one of several royal dynasties that rule the area.

Kamsa??(TM)s father, Ugrasena, is known for having been a righteous and dutiful ruler. But Kamsa, the documents say, is just the opposite.

In Delhi, government officials declined to comment. The government is reluctant to say anything, a source close to the government said, lest Kamsa turn his anger on Delhi itself.

(by Jayadvaita Swami - Copyright 2005 The Bhaktivedanta Book Trust. www.Krishna.com)

NEW YORK Among alleged tyrants and oppressors, the one the United Demigods now regard as the worst is King Kamsa of Mathura, according to confidential documents made available on Monday to DNS. ??oeHe rules his kingdom with a cruel and brutal hand, he has an extensive and growing network of powerful allies, and his ambitions are global,?? the documents say. ??oeThere??(TM)s no limit to what territory and resources he wants, or what methods he??(TM)ll employ to gain control of them.??

Kamsa??(TM)s kingdom, Mathura, is located in north central India, midway between Delhi and Agra, the site of the Taj Mahal. Mathura is the name of both the kingdom and its capital. Kamsa belongs to what is known as the Bhoja dynasty, one of several royal dynasties that rule the area.

Kamsa??(TM)s father, Ugrasena, is known for having been a righteous and dutiful ruler. But Kamsa, the documents say, is just the opposite.

In Delhi, government officials declined to comment. The government is reluctant to say anything, a source close to the government said, lest Kamsa turn his anger on Delhi itself.

(by Jayadvaita Swami - Copyright 2005 The Bhaktivedanta Book Trust. www.Krishna.com)

NEW YORK Since a delegation of demigods received assurances of support from Lord Vishnu some days ago, political observers say the demigods have become quietly but increasingly active in laying the groundwork for opposition to allegedly repressive and exploitive political regimes. The coalition of demigods has become known as the United Demigods.

??oeThe demigods just can??(TM)t bear to stand by and watch cheaters and thugs in the name of political leaders run roughshod over the earth,?? said a U.D. spokesman, Prakash Sattwa. ??oeThe earth isn??(TM)t ours,?? he said. ??oeIt belongs to God. We all have a right to live here and take as much as we need??"but not to grab more and call it ours.??

The demigods are believed to be quietly taking up strategic positions in various parts of the world, apparently in preparation for some sort of initiative by Lord Vishnu. Some observers have suggested that Lord Vishnu??(TM)s brother may also get involved. Mr. Sattwa declined to comment on such reports.

But speaking more generally, Mr. Sattwa was blunt. The nations of the world have become like thieves, he said. ??oeThey steal everything they can from the earth,?? he said, ??oeand then they fight over it.?? And then the thieves get together and have a peace talk or a summit conference about how to divide things fairly, Mr. Sattwa said. ??oeThieves dividing piously.??

The U.S. State Department and the British Foreign Office both declined comment, as did the foreign-affairs offices of twenty other nations contacted by DNS.

(by Jayadvaita Swami - Copyright 2005 The Bhaktivedanta Book Trust. www.Krishna.com)

NEW YORK Since a delegation of demigods received assurances of support from Lord Vishnu some days ago, political observers say the demigods have become quietly but increasingly active in laying the groundwork for opposition to allegedly repressive and exploitive political regimes. The coalition of demigods has become known as the United Demigods.

??oeThe demigods just can??(TM)t bear to stand by and watch cheaters and thugs in the name of political leaders run roughshod over the earth,?? said a U.D. spokesman, Prakash Sattwa. ??oeThe earth isn??(TM)t ours,?? he said. ??oeIt belongs to God. We all have a right to live here and take as much as we need??"but not to grab more and call it ours.??

The demigods are believed to be quietly taking up strategic positions in various parts of the world, apparently in preparation for some sort of initiative by Lord Vishnu. Some observers have suggested that Lord Vishnu??(TM)s brother may also get involved. Mr. Sattwa declined to comment on such reports.

But speaking more generally, Mr. Sattwa was blunt. The nations of the world have become like thieves, he said. ??oeThey steal everything they can from the earth,?? he said, ??oeand then they fight over it.?? And then the thieves get together and have a peace talk or a summit conference about how to divide things fairly, Mr. Sattwa said. ??oeThieves dividing piously.??

The U.S. State Department and the British Foreign Office both declined comment, as did the foreign-affairs offices of twenty other nations contacted by DNS.

Greetings are so powerful.

Good hotels, restaurants and conference centers employ one person (sometimes even two!) for no other purpose than saying "good morning" to people as they come in the door.

The Srimad Bhagavatam advocates that every guest must be offered at least some nice words of greeting, a seat and some water (SB 1.18.28). Samika Rishi got himself in trouble because he did not offer these to Maharaja Parikshit. There is even a special hellish planet for those people who fail to greet their guests properly.

When a guest enters one's house or (especially!) one's temple or outreach center one should drop everything and immediately rush to greet that guest. That guest should be made to feel so super-welcome that they can not help but desire to come back again and again. Ignoring guests is mega-dangerous, counter-productive and not good for business.

Greetings are so powerful.

Good hotels, restaurants and conference centers employ one person (sometimes even two!) for no other purpose than saying "good morning" to people as they come in the door.

The Srimad Bhagavatam advocates that every guest must be offered at least some nice words of greeting, a seat and some water (SB 1.18.28). Samika Rishi got himself in trouble because he did not offer these to Maharaja Parikshit. There is even a special hellish planet for those people who fail to greet their guests properly.

When a guest enters one's house or (especially!) one's temple or outreach center one should drop everything and immediately rush to greet that guest. That guest should be made to feel so super-welcome that they can not help but desire to come back again and again. Ignoring guests is mega-dangerous, counter-productive and not good for business.

This weeks Vedicsoc session brought three new guests from three different countries: one guy from India, one from Portugal and one from Spain. We did some slow-deep yoga (comment: ??oewow, I vibrated the mantra in the crown of my head and felt it reverberate all the way to my feet. Amazing!??). We also did some chanting. Then we discussed complications and how they lead to stress.

I asked everyone to write down five complications in their lives that lead to stress, either now or in the future. We then exchanged pieces of paper and tried to help each with our stress problems.

Most problems were along the lines of:

• Job after graduation
• Separation from friends and family
• Relations with the opposite sex

It turned out to be very difficult for everyone to come up with solutions. The general mood was: ??oewell, I guess you??(TM)re just stuck, stress is inevitable.??

Everyone left with great eagerness for next week??(TM)s session: ??oewhat kinds of spiritual solutions are there???

This weeks Vedicsoc session brought three new guests from three different countries: one guy from India, one from Portugal and one from Spain. We did some slow-deep yoga (comment: ??oewow, I vibrated the mantra in the crown of my head and felt it reverberate all the way to my feet. Amazing!??). We also did some chanting. Then we discussed complications and how they lead to stress.

I asked everyone to write down five complications in their lives that lead to stress, either now or in the future. We then exchanged pieces of paper and tried to help each with our stress problems.

Most problems were along the lines of:

• Job after graduation
• Separation from friends and family
• Relations with the opposite sex

It turned out to be very difficult for everyone to come up with solutions. The general mood was: ??oewell, I guess you??(TM)re just stuck, stress is inevitable.??

Everyone left with great eagerness for next week??(TM)s session: ??oewhat kinds of spiritual solutions are there???

No one came.

No one came.

Check out this photo gallery with pictures of Wellington and Lake Taupo retreat. The pictures are taken by Bhakta Dwayne with a super-high quality 8-megapixel Olympus E-300 D-SLR. The Harinam pictures are particularly nectarian.

Check out this photo gallery with pictures of Wellington and Lake Taupo retreat. The pictures are taken by Bhakta Dwayne with a super-high quality 8-megapixel Olympus E-300 D-SLR. The Harinam pictures are particularly nectarian.

Standard big bang theory states that the amount of space in the universe is increasing, but the amount of matter is fixed.

If you take any amount of matter and compress it into a single point, that point becomes infinitely dense (and infinitely hot). That was what was supposed to have been the state of the universe at the time of the big bang. However, the mathematical formulas for understanding the laws of nature don't work when one of the starts putting in "infinity". You get all kinds of nonsense results. So, really smart physicists have come up with all kinds of theories and speculations as to how to tweak the model in order to make the impossibility of the big bang infinity work.

Now, a few billion years after the big bang, scientists observe that everything in the universe is moving away from everything else. The common analogy is to describe it as a loaf of yeasted raisin bread rising. The raisins are the matter in the universe and the bread is the empty space. As the empty space increases (the bread rises) the raisins move further away from each other. The number of raisins (amount of matter) remains the same, but the size of the bread (universal empty space) increases.

Then you get into what and where the matter in the universe is. 99% of it is this mysterious dark matter or dark energy that no one knows what it is and no one can detect, but must be there to make the mathematics work.

So, all in all, the physicists have no clue, they are just guessing wildly. Check out Carana Renu??(TM)s blog, a good friend of mine who has a PhD in astrophysics.

As I mentioned in this blog posting of mine: looking into the 5000-year old Vedic literature of ancient India sheds some light on the mystery. Those writings state that there are an unlimited number of parallel universes, each finite in the amount of matter they contain. Within each universe there are roughly 36000 cycles of partial creations and destructions (one might call them big bangs and big crunches) before one particular universe is completely destroyed (after 311 trillion years). Within the universe humans occupy only a tiny amount of space. The Vedas state that there are 14 different loka-systems (literally: places). Earth and reality as we see it occupies only one of these. The most advanced living beings in this universe live in a place called Satyaloka (literally: perfected-place) (and yes indeed, human beings are not the pinnacle of evolution). The big bang doesn't kill the people in that supreme sphere of existence. They only die after 311 trillion years (lifetime of Brahma) when the actual universe is destroyed (sucked into a skin pore of Maha-Vishnu).

So, from the Vedic perspective, it is no wonder that the Universe doesn't make sense to the scientists, since most of it is in different (higher-dimensional?) space which we can't understand with our limited, low-class material bodies.

... and I have not even mentioned the spiritual reality where time does not exist.

Standard big bang theory states that the amount of space in the universe is increasing, but the amount of matter is fixed.

If you take any amount of matter and compress it into a single point, that point becomes infinitely dense (and infinitely hot). That was what was supposed to have been the state of the universe at the time of the big bang. However, the mathematical formulas for understanding the laws of nature don't work when one of the starts putting in "infinity". You get all kinds of nonsense results. So, really smart physicists have come up with all kinds of theories and speculations as to how to tweak the model in order to make the impossibility of the big bang infinity work.

Now, a few billion years after the big bang, scientists observe that everything in the universe is moving away from everything else. The common analogy is to describe it as a loaf of yeasted raisin bread rising. The raisins are the matter in the universe and the bread is the empty space. As the empty space increases (the bread rises) the raisins move further away from each other. The number of raisins (amount of matter) remains the same, but the size of the bread (universal empty space) increases.

Then you get into what and where the matter in the universe is. 99% of it is this mysterious dark matter or dark energy that no one knows what it is and no one can detect, but must be there to make the mathematics work.

So, all in all, the physicists have no clue, they are just guessing wildly. Check out Carana Renu??(TM)s blog, a good friend of mine who has a PhD in astrophysics.

As I mentioned in this blog posting of mine: looking into the 5000-year old Vedic literature of ancient India sheds some light on the mystery. Those writings state that there are an unlimited number of parallel universes, each finite in the amount of matter they contain. Within each universe there are roughly 36000 cycles of partial creations and destructions (one might call them big bangs and big crunches) before one particular universe is completely destroyed (after 311 trillion years). Within the universe humans occupy only a tiny amount of space. The Vedas state that there are 14 different loka-systems (literally: places). Earth and reality as we see it occupies only one of these. The most advanced living beings in this universe live in a place called Satyaloka (literally: perfected-place) (and yes indeed, human beings are not the pinnacle of evolution). The big bang doesn't kill the people in that supreme sphere of existence. They only die after 311 trillion years (lifetime of Brahma) when the actual universe is destroyed (sucked into a skin pore of Maha-Vishnu).

So, from the Vedic perspective, it is no wonder that the Universe doesn't make sense to the scientists, since most of it is in different (higher-dimensional?) space which we can't understand with our limited, low-class material bodies.

... and I have not even mentioned the spiritual reality where time does not exist.

Good news! I??(TM)ve gotten another paper accepted. My paper on "Web Ontology Segmentation: Analysis, Classification and Use" got accepted for the WWW 2006 conference in Edinburgh, Scotland.

The World Wide Web conference is one of the most prestigious conferences in the field. This year a record number of 700 papers got submitted. Of these, only 81 papers were accepted for publication. An acceptance ratio of just 11%!

The paper is available in the publications section of this website.

Good news! I??(TM)ve gotten another paper accepted. My paper on "Web Ontology Segmentation: Analysis, Classification and Use" got accepted for the WWW 2006 conference in Edinburgh, Scotland.

The World Wide Web conference is one of the most prestigious conferences in the field. This year a record number of 700 papers got submitted. Of these, only 81 papers were accepted for publication. An acceptance ratio of just 11%!

The paper is available in the publications section of this website.

In this podcast Leslie Lamb, the chief risk manager of Cisco Systems, talks about how risks management should be done. It??(TM)s not very difficult, but hardly anyone does it.

It does not take a genius to figure out what the main risks effecting an organization. Nations know who is likely to attack them. Scientists know where the next big natural disasters will strike. Companies know who their main competitors are. People know what goods and services they are dependent on.

Risk management just means making a list of all the risks and all the things that, in a perfect world, could be done to mitigate those risks. Then all one needs to do is pick those risk mitigating activities that are doable and do them. Easy!

(??¦ and potentially life-saving)

So, as part my own personal risk management strategy, I??(TM)ll be planning to move out of Europe because of, among other things, the risk of abrupt climate change in the near future.

In this podcast Leslie Lamb, the chief risk manager of Cisco Systems, talks about how risks management should be done. It??(TM)s not very difficult, but hardly anyone does it.

It does not take a genius to figure out what the main risks effecting an organization. Nations know who is likely to attack them. Scientists know where the next big natural disasters will strike. Companies know who their main competitors are. People know what goods and services they are dependent on.

Risk management just means making a list of all the risks and all the things that, in a perfect world, could be done to mitigate those risks. Then all one needs to do is pick those risk mitigating activities that are doable and do them. Easy!

(??¦ and potentially life-saving)

So, as part my own personal risk management strategy, I??(TM)ll be planning to move out of Europe because of, among other things, the risk of abrupt climate change in the near future.

On the topic of disasters: Kim Stanley Robinson, famous science-fiction writer and author of the trilogy of books (Red Mars, Green Mars, Blue Mars) about an effort to terraform Mars, has a new series of books out about the effect of global warming. He talks about them in this podcast.

The first book of the series is about how large super-hurricanes will develop and flood major cities (it was written before Hurricane Katrina).

The second book is about how the Gulf Stream will stop flowing. Scientists have predicted there is a 50% chance of the Gulf Stream stalling in the next 100 years. The Gulf Stream moves vast amounts of hot tropical air into the North Atlantic. However, because of global warming the ice caps are melting and thereby more and more freshwater is being released into the ocean. The Gulf Stream will no longer float on top of such a salt-less ocean and sink to the bottom. Without the Stream the temperature in the East Coast of the USA and all of Western Europe will drop dramatically. These regions will turn into an artic wasteland with temperatures as low as -50 C. When it happens (and it is only a matter of time), this abrupt climate change will take place over a period of just 3 years.

The book describes a hypothetical effort to re-salt the ocean using a huge fleet of salt-filled oil tankers.

Read more on this looming natural disaster. Plus, more information on the many effects of global warming.

On the topic of disasters: Kim Stanley Robinson, famous science-fiction writer and author of the trilogy of books (Red Mars, Green Mars, Blue Mars) about an effort to terraform Mars, has a new series of books out about the effect of global warming. He talks about them in this podcast.

The first book of the series is about how large super-hurricanes will develop and flood major cities (it was written before Hurricane Katrina).

The second book is about how the Gulf Stream will stop flowing. Scientists have predicted there is a 50% chance of the Gulf Stream stalling in the next 100 years. The Gulf Stream moves vast amounts of hot tropical air into the North Atlantic. However, because of global warming the ice caps are melting and thereby more and more freshwater is being released into the ocean. The Gulf Stream will no longer float on top of such a salt-less ocean and sink to the bottom. Without the Stream the temperature in the East Coast of the USA and all of Western Europe will drop dramatically. These regions will turn into an artic wasteland with temperatures as low as -50 C. When it happens (and it is only a matter of time), this abrupt climate change will take place over a period of just 3 years.

The book describes a hypothetical effort to re-salt the ocean using a huge fleet of salt-filled oil tankers.

Read more on this looming natural disaster. Plus, more information on the many effects of global warming.

The exam period is over and Vedicsoc has restarted. Unfortunately, there was quite a low turnout: 3 people. I??(TM)ll have to do more advertising.

We did however have a good session of power yoga and a very nice discussion of the practicalities of the senses, various ashrams (stages of life) and general Krishna consciousness. I also made some Auzzi Anzac Cookies, which seemed to go down well, although I thought I made them a bit too crunchy.

The exam period is over and Vedicsoc has restarted. Unfortunately, there was quite a low turnout: 3 people. I??(TM)ll have to do more advertising.

We did however have a good session of power yoga and a very nice discussion of the practicalities of the senses, various ashrams (stages of life) and general Krishna consciousness. I also made some Auzzi Anzac Cookies, which seemed to go down well, although I thought I made them a bit too crunchy.

So, I've watched Steve Job's presentation, studied the specifications, read the various opinions online and now offer my thoughts about the new Apple MacBook Pro (hate the name!) notebook computers:

Positives:

• Fair price ($2000). A similarly configured laptop from other vendors costs:
  • Gateway NX560 = $1800 (good specs, but historically terrible quality)
  • Dell E1705 = $2300 (they only sell a 17" system, which naturally costs more)
  • IBM T60 = $2049 (somewhat inferior specs in comparison to Apple)
  • Acer 8204 = $2000 (with better specs than the Apple, but ??¦ four letter word for computer disaster)
  • HP dv1000t = $1900 (significantly worse specs than the Apple)

  And yes, we can argue at great length over what it means to be similarly configured, but I've found, in general, that Apple's pricing is within 10% of everyone else. So, all things considered, no luxury tax from Apple.

• Lighter (5.6 pounds) and smaller (1 inch thick) than any equivalent notebook I know of. For example, the IBM Thinkpad T43 weights 6.0 pounds, has a 15" (vs. 15.4") screen and is 1.4 inches thick.
• Built-in high quality video camera (for when Skype eventually get around to releasing video skype for Mac ??" which should be "real soon now")
• Has a dual core Pentium-M (or I guess Intel is calling them Core Duo now) processor in it. Two processors on one chip for double the speed. In reality, depending on the application, it will only be about 30% - 60% faster. It does however really shine when doing multiple things at once. For example: try, all at once, burning a CD, downloading something from the Internet, playing a video, browsing a photo library and creating a backup and watch a single core chip grind to a halt.
• Battery life is currently unknown (but will be pretty good since it uses a new lithium-polymer battery technology instead of standard lithium-ion)
• Very bright screen. Apple says it is as good as an external LCD monitor. Better than most other laptop screens on the market (those super-bright Sony screens may look nice, but the glair off the ultra-reflective surface makes them very difficult to read text on. What use is a screen that is difficult to read off of?!).
• Much, much, much better graphics card (ATi Mobility Radeon X1600) than anything else on the market. This is important because Mac OS X takes full advantage of the graphics card, unlike Windows, which makes no use of it whatsoever (until Windows Vista is released next Christmas).

Negatives:

• Costs an extra $200 - $300 for novelty of getting the latest and greatest Intel processor. But, when the processor prices come down, Apple will probably keep the MacBook price the same and just add more features, so no harm in buying one now.
• Doesn't have a modem. Steve Jobs has decided they are obsolete (an external USB-modem costs $50).
• Cheaper consumer iBook laptops with smaller screens will probably be release in April or July.
• Can't yet run Windows applications inside of Mac OS X. However, many people (Microsoft included) are feverously working on this.
• No two-button mouse on the touchpad. Mac OS X does not need a right mouse button, but it may be difficult to use Windows (once it is available on the MacBook) without plugging in an external mouse.
• Some notable Mac application providers haven't created so called "universal binaries" yet that are needed to achieve optimum performance on Intel processors. Key applications (for example Office and Photoshop) will run relatively slowly (at 50-80% of original speed) until new versions come out.
• Seems ever so slightly rushed: same basic case as the previous model. No revolutionary new feature. (Apple is being smart by not changing too many things at once). Nothing that fundamentally distinguishes it from a standard PC (apart from the camera, weight, size, "front-row" remote control, software and operating system). Okay, there is actually plenty unique stuff about this computer. I eat my words.
• The MacBook Pro is, for all intents and purposes, an iMac desktop computer in a portable case. However, the iMac is roughly half the price. This is realistic pricing for the added portability and miniaturization, but feels rather uncomfortable, since the two systems are otherwise so similar.

It is a really good laptop. I was however wishing it to be lighter than the previous model, have a bigger hard drive, have enhanced application startup performance using Intel's Robson flash-memory caching technology and use faster Core Duo processors than 1.83 Ghz (they go up to 2.16 Ghz), all of which should have been possible, but would, of course, have driven up the cost.

Also, Apple engineers aren't magicians. While the MacBook Pro's hardware is, in my opinion, better than everything else on the market, it is only by a slight margin. The main reason for buying this computer is the Mac OS X operating system, not the hardware.

So, in review, on all accounts a great machine. Only a few unknowns still need to get resolves. I'll wait at least until April before buying one for myself . I'd really like something smaller and lighter than the current offering to replace my prehistoric Dell Inspiron 4150 monster. For example: a 13-inch MacBook Pro would hit the spot ...

Update: Apple has upgraded the MacBook Pro processor options to feature the fastest Intel processors currently available (2.16 Ghz) and boosted their default "low-end" model up to 1.83 Ghz. Large hard drives are also available as build-to-order options. Battery life also appears to be at least as good as the old Powerbooks'. However, the new MagSafe power supply brick (85W) is roughly 30% larger than the the old 15" Powerbook power supply (65W).

So, all I'm left wishing for is Robson and slightly less weight (especially since the larger power supply makes this new Mac heavier than the previous model).

So, I've watched Steve Job's presentation, studied the specifications, read the various opinions online and now offer my thoughts about the new Apple MacBook Pro (hate the name!) notebook computers:

Positives:

• Fair price ($2000). A similarly configured laptop from other vendors costs:
  • Gateway NX560 = $1800 (good specs, but historically terrible quality)
  • Dell E1705 = $2300 (they only sell a 17" system, which naturally costs more)
  • IBM T60 = $2049 (somewhat inferior specs in comparison to Apple)
  • Acer 8204 = $2000 (with better specs than the Apple, but ??¦ four letter word for computer disaster)
  • HP dv1000t = $1900 (significantly worse specs than the Apple)

  And yes, we can argue at great length over what it means to be similarly configured, but I've found, in general, that Apple's pricing is within 10% of everyone else. So, all things considered, no luxury tax from Apple.

• Lighter (5.6 pounds) and smaller (1 inch thick) than any equivalent notebook I know of. For example, the IBM Thinkpad T43 weights 6.0 pounds, has a 15" (vs. 15.4") screen and is 1.4 inches thick.
• Built-in high quality video camera (for when Skype eventually get around to releasing video skype for Mac ??" which should be "real soon now")
• Has a dual core Pentium-M (or I guess Intel is calling them Core Duo now) processor in it. Two processors on one chip for double the speed. In reality, depending on the application, it will only be about 30% - 60% faster. It does however really shine when doing multiple things at once. For example: try, all at once, burning a CD, downloading something from the Internet, playing a video, browsing a photo library and creating a backup and watch a single core chip grind to a halt.
• Battery life is currently unknown (but will be pretty good since it uses a new lithium-polymer battery technology instead of standard lithium-ion)
• Very bright screen. Apple says it is as good as an external LCD monitor. Better than most other laptop screens on the market (those super-bright Sony screens may look nice, but the glair off the ultra-reflective surface makes them very difficult to read text on. What use is a screen that is difficult to read off of?!).
• Much, much, much better graphics card (ATi Mobility Radeon X1600) than anything else on the market. This is important because Mac OS X takes full advantage of the graphics card, unlike Windows, which makes no use of it whatsoever (until Windows Vista is released next Christmas).

Negatives:

• Costs an extra $200 - $300 for novelty of getting the latest and greatest Intel processor. But, when the processor prices come down, Apple will probably keep the MacBook price the same and just add more features, so no harm in buying one now.
• Doesn't have a modem. Steve Jobs has decided they are obsolete (an external USB-modem costs $50).
• Cheaper consumer iBook laptops with smaller screens will probably be release in April or July.
• Can't yet run Windows applications inside of Mac OS X. However, many people (Microsoft included) are feverously working on this.
• No two-button mouse on the touchpad. Mac OS X does not need a right mouse button, but it may be difficult to use Windows (once it is available on the MacBook) without plugging in an external mouse.
• Some notable Mac application providers haven't created so called "universal binaries" yet that are needed to achieve optimum performance on Intel processors. Key applications (for example Office and Photoshop) will run relatively slowly (at 50-80% of original speed) until new versions come out.
• Seems ever so slightly rushed: same basic case as the previous model. No revolutionary new feature. (Apple is being smart by not changing too many things at once). Nothing that fundamentally distinguishes it from a standard PC (apart from the camera, weight, size, "front-row" remote control, software and operating system). Okay, there is actually plenty unique stuff about this computer. I eat my words.
• The MacBook Pro is, for all intents and purposes, an iMac desktop computer in a portable case. However, the iMac is roughly half the price. This is realistic pricing for the added portability and miniaturization, but feels rather uncomfortable, since the two systems are otherwise so similar.

It is a really good laptop. I was however wishing it to be lighter than the previous model, have a bigger hard drive, have enhanced application startup performance using Intel's Robson flash-memory caching technology and use faster Core Duo processors than 1.83 Ghz (they go up to 2.16 Ghz), all of which should have been possible, but would, of course, have driven up the cost.

Also, Apple engineers aren't magicians. While the MacBook Pro's hardware is, in my opinion, better than everything else on the market, it is only by a slight margin. The main reason for buying this computer is the Mac OS X operating system, not the hardware.

So, in review, on all accounts a great machine. Only a few unknowns still need to get resolves. I'll wait at least until April before buying one for myself . I'd really like something smaller and lighter than the current offering to replace my prehistoric Dell Inspiron 4150 monster. For example: a 13-inch MacBook Pro would hit the spot ...

Update: Apple has upgraded the MacBook Pro processor options to feature the fastest Intel processors currently available (2.16 Ghz) and boosted their default "low-end" model up to 1.83 Ghz. Large hard drives are also available as build-to-order options. Battery life also appears to be at least as good as the old Powerbooks'. However, the new MagSafe power supply brick (85W) is roughly 30% larger than the the old 15" Powerbook power supply (65W).

So, all I'm left wishing for is Robson and slightly less weight (especially since the larger power supply makes this new Mac heavier than the previous model).

I went to see Dr. Philip Weeks again last week. My health took a nosedive just before Christmas and I had to increase my intake of Asacol, the western drug I??(TM)m taking to stop my immune system from destroying my digestion system. The downside of Asacol is that in the long term it reduces the body??(TM)s immune system function.

According to Philip my type of ulcerative colitis is caused by my thinking too much: I tend to forever ponder, worry, deliberate, reflect and hypothesize. Moreover, my job at the moment (PhD student) is to come up with something that no one else has ever thought of. Needless to say, that involves a lot of thinking. Not good for my condition.

Luckily, although Ulcerative Colitis is quite a severe disease, my bodily constitution is quite strong. I therefore don't suffer too much, provided I strictly watch what I eat (no dairy, no deep-fried, no gluten), get enough sleep and get regular exercise.

Solution: heal the internal inflammation, reduce the acid in the body and increase the fire of digestion.

Method: regular acupuncture, herbal tinctures and moxibustion (Philip filled my navel with salt and ignited various herbs on top of it)

Some medical practitioners are purists: ??oeAyurveda is the only way!?? Not so with Philip. He, among other things, subscribes to the pragmatic philosophy of Chinese medicine. The Chinese don??(TM)t worry about mixing different types of medicine: herbs, steroids, acupuncture, antibiotics, homeopathy, surgery ??¦ whatever works, mix it all together! The main thing is to help the patient. Unfortunately, the really good Chinese doctors stay in China. Most practitioners of Chinese medicine in the west are not very skilled (and also tend to use all kinds of abominable animal products in their medical preparations).

I went to see Dr. Philip Weeks again last week. My health took a nosedive just before Christmas and I had to increase my intake of Asacol, the western drug I??(TM)m taking to stop my immune system from destroying my digestion system. The downside of Asacol is that in the long term it reduces the body??(TM)s immune system function.

According to Philip my type of ulcerative colitis is caused by my thinking too much: I tend to forever ponder, worry, deliberate, reflect and hypothesize. Moreover, my job at the moment (PhD student) is to come up with something that no one else has ever thought of. Needless to say, that involves a lot of thinking. Not good for my condition.

Luckily, although Ulcerative Colitis is quite a severe disease, my bodily constitution is quite strong. I therefore don't suffer too much, provided I strictly watch what I eat (no dairy, no deep-fried, no gluten), get enough sleep and get regular exercise.

Solution: heal the internal inflammation, reduce the acid in the body and increase the fire of digestion.

Method: regular acupuncture, herbal tinctures and moxibustion (Philip filled my navel with salt and ignited various herbs on top of it)

Some medical practitioners are purists: ??oeAyurveda is the only way!?? Not so with Philip. He, among other things, subscribes to the pragmatic philosophy of Chinese medicine. The Chinese don??(TM)t worry about mixing different types of medicine: herbs, steroids, acupuncture, antibiotics, homeopathy, surgery ??¦ whatever works, mix it all together! The main thing is to help the patient. Unfortunately, the really good Chinese doctors stay in China. Most practitioners of Chinese medicine in the west are not very skilled (and also tend to use all kinds of abominable animal products in their medical preparations).

On Christmas day our central heating system broke down. The temperature was -10 C.

We borrowed several electric heaters from the neighbors, which barely managed to keep the house somewhat warm. If the electricity had also broken down, we would have been finished.

Two days later we called a plumber to fix the system. However, after trying various things and replacing some parts of the system the boiler still refused to work. He eventually gave up and suggested phoning the manufacturer.

Two days after that a specialist from Junkers Corporation came and replaced nearly every component of the heating system. It had not been serviced for 20 years and most parts were beyond repair. Lesson learnt: take good care of machines, service them regularly and fix things as soon as they break. Leaving a fault unrepaired will very soon result in many compounding problems and cause some major headaches (or worse).

I remember that way in the dark ages (i.e. 20 or so years ago) we, and practically everyone around us, used to have a wood/coal burning stove attached to chimney. To warm the house we would light the fire. Simple. With a sufficient stockpile of burnable fuel there was practically no danger of freezing.

Now however, with the advent of nice, convenient modern central heating systems, we are no longer independent. If the underground gas supply system breaks down, we freeze. If the boiler unit breaks, we freeze. If the electricity cuts out, the boiler unit no longer works and we freeze. If the underground water supply system breaks down, the boiler can no longer heat water to supply to the radiators and ??¦ we freeze.

A good, fault tolerant system has multiple backups and few dependencies. Modern society is just the opposite: too many dependencies and no contingency plan.

For example: 5 years ago protestors prevented the fuel/gas/petrol tanker trucks from carrying out their work. Within a couple of days the entire country ground to a halt. Keeping stock is expensive, so everything in shops is delivered just-in-time. With no fuel, deliveries can't happen. The result: within a few days there was no more food in the country. The government had to step in and force the protesters to stop.

German keeps an emergency oil reserve that will last for 90 days. The USA maintains a 50 day stockpile. However, in the event of a breakdown of the distribution mechanism, those stockpiles will be pretty much useless.

Realization: if a small disaster knocks out one or two of the main utilities (water, gas, electricity, fuel) of one of our great, powerful western consumer democracies, then that nation will be reduced to total anarchy in a matter of months!

As Sitapati blogged recently: a post-apocalyptic world as portrayed in Mad Max and many other science fiction films is becoming more and more of a probability. Much more so now, than ever before.

On Christmas day our central heating system broke down. The temperature was -10 C.

We borrowed several electric heaters from the neighbors, which barely managed to keep the house somewhat warm. If the electricity had also broken down, we would have been finished.

Two days later we called a plumber to fix the system. However, after trying various things and replacing some parts of the system the boiler still refused to work. He eventually gave up and suggested phoning the manufacturer.

Two days after that a specialist from Junkers Corporation came and replaced nearly every component of the heating system. It had not been serviced for 20 years and most parts were beyond repair. Lesson learnt: take good care of machines, service them regularly and fix things as soon as they break. Leaving a fault unrepaired will very soon result in many compounding problems and cause some major headaches (or worse).

I remember that way in the dark ages (i.e. 20 or so years ago) we, and practically everyone around us, used to have a wood/coal burning stove attached to chimney. To warm the house we would light the fire. Simple. With a sufficient stockpile of burnable fuel there was practically no danger of freezing.

Now however, with the advent of nice, convenient modern central heating systems, we are no longer independent. If the underground gas supply system breaks down, we freeze. If the boiler unit breaks, we freeze. If the electricity cuts out, the boiler unit no longer works and we freeze. If the underground water supply system breaks down, the boiler can no longer heat water to supply to the radiators and ??¦ we freeze.

A good, fault tolerant system has multiple backups and few dependencies. Modern society is just the opposite: too many dependencies and no contingency plan.

For example: 5 years ago protestors prevented the fuel/gas/petrol tanker trucks from carrying out their work. Within a couple of days the entire country ground to a halt. Keeping stock is expensive, so everything in shops is delivered just-in-time. With no fuel, deliveries can't happen. The result: within a few days there was no more food in the country. The government had to step in and force the protesters to stop.

German keeps an emergency oil reserve that will last for 90 days. The USA maintains a 50 day stockpile. However, in the event of a breakdown of the distribution mechanism, those stockpiles will be pretty much useless.

Realization: if a small disaster knocks out one or two of the main utilities (water, gas, electricity, fuel) of one of our great, powerful western consumer democracies, then that nation will be reduced to total anarchy in a matter of months!

As Sitapati blogged recently: a post-apocalyptic world as portrayed in Mad Max and many other science fiction films is becoming more and more of a probability. Much more so now, than ever before.

23|1Last Saturday I hosted a Saturday Feast at my flat. Nanda Sunu, Tejpal, Ben and Joy attended. It was nice to have all their association. Good association keeps me out of trouble (smile).

On the menu:

• Quinoa, Tomato and Cucumber Salad
• Vegetarian Sheppard??(TM)s Pie
• Zucchini, Green Pepper and Tomato Subji
• Almond & Pea Rice
• Sunflower Seed Cookies

Among other things we discussed various philosophies including Buddhism. This verse and purport from the Caitanya Caritamrita explains the flaws in the nine fundamental principles of Buddhism. It's an interesting read.

However, as stated in the purport, logical argument is boring and useless. We can argue, speculate and discuss as long as we like, but, in the end, everything comes down to the direct conscious experience of Krishna. The proof of the pudding is in the eating: Krishna consciousness.

Check out some pictures of the event. Nanda Sunu has also blogged about it.