Transforming Lives Through Love and Spiritual Wisdom, February 1
→ Dandavats

By Dandavats Staff Writer

Nandan Acharya Bhavan Kartik Yatra 2024. ISKCON Chowpatty. Devotional service in different modes. Welcome to Mahakumbh Mela! Draupadi's Inquiry: A Lesson in Devotion. Why Devotion Surpasses Knowledge. The Power of Surrender. Prayer for the Victims of the Washington, D. C. Airplane Crash. Devotion, Knowledge, and Liberation. Class on Bhagavad Gita. Stop Harming Yourself. "If your heart is always crying for God, that is perfect religion." Mayapur Mellows Continue reading "Transforming Lives Through Love and Spiritual Wisdom, February 1
→ Dandavats"

Separation and Devotion: The Power of Surrender
→ Dandavats

The video discusses the deep connection between devotees and Krishna, emphasizing separation and reciprocation. It explores how Krishna’s presence alleviates suffering and how the false ego and mind create barriers to devotion. The speaker shares personal insights on managing the mind, intuition, and maintaining a heartfelt relationship with Krishna through chanting, surrender, and self-awareness.
Read More...

Why Devotion Surpasses Knowledge and Austerity
→ Dandavats

HH Yadunandana Swami Maharaja discusses Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.5.47, emphasizing the superiority of devotional service over impersonal realization. He highlights the joy of bhakti, Krishna’s care for devotees, and the importance of surrender. Through examples from scripture, he explains detachment, transcendental pleasure, and overcoming material suffering through sincere devotion.
Read More...

Srila Prabhupada’s Mission and Divine Humility
→ Dandavats

HH Trivikrama Swami Maharaj discusses Bhagavad Gita 10.8, emphasizing Krishna as the Supreme source of everything. He highlights Srila Prabhupada’s humility, devotion, and impact in spreading Krishna consciousness worldwide. Through personal anecdotes, he illustrates Prabhupada’s deep faith, simplicity, and mission. He encourages devotion, humility, and consistent chanting of Krishna’s name.
Read More...

Draupadi’s Inquiry: A Lesson in Devotion
→ Dandavats

Vraj Bihari Dasa discusses Srimad Bhagavatam 10.83.5-7, where Draupadi asks Krishna’s wives how they married Him. He highlights the power of meaningful questions, curiosity, and deep spiritual inquiry. The session explores humility, devotion, and the role of sincere questioning in spiritual growth, drawing parallels with everyday experiences and philosophical insights.
Read More...

Devotional service in different modes—ignorance, passion, and goodness
→ Dandavats

HH SB Keshav Swami discusses Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam Canto 4, highlighting devotional service in different modes—ignorance, passion, and goodness. He explains how King Pṛthu’s birth and markings signify his divine role. He critiques false incarnations, emphasizing scriptural validation. He also reflects on modern attempts to control and enjoy the world, urging surrender to Krishna.
Read More...

Sony Introduces High-Priced Afeela Car at CES 2025
→ Tech Tomorrow

Sony has once again made headlines with its groundbreaking innovation, the high-priced Afeela car, which was unveiled at the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) 2025. This latest offering from the tech giant not only showcases Sony's commitment to cutting-edge technology but also signals a significant shift in the automotive industry. In this article, we delve into the features, technology, and future implications of the Afeela car, providing a comprehensive overview for both enthusiasts and industry professionals.

The post Sony Introduces High-Priced Afeela Car at CES 2025 appeared first on Tech Tomorrow.

Devotion and Service Uplifting Communities Globally, January 31
→ Dandavats

By Dandavats Staff Writer

He Kissed His Reflection! Mayapur Clean and Green. How Free Are We? Reality, Poetry, Consciousness, Enlightenment, Metaphor and Srimad-Bhagavatam. Maya's Friend Norm. Taking shelter of the Lord and rendering service unto Him. Why bad things happen to good people? Devotees in Ukraine distribute prasadam amid bombings. Transcending Worldly Affairs Through Krishna's Mercy. What Iskcon is Doing in Mahakumbh? Srila Prabhupada: The Notebook of Krishna. Expecting Mother's opportunity. Celebrities in Mahakumbh. Continue reading "Devotion and Service Uplifting Communities Globally, January 31
→ Dandavats"

Innovative Phone Toasters Debut at CES 2025
→ Tech Tomorrow

The Consumer Electronics Show (CES) 2025, one of the world's largest and most influential technology expos, welcomed a groundbreaking debut that has left the tech community buzzing: the innovative Phone Toaster. This hybrid device, which seamlessly combines the functionalities of a smartphone and a toaster, promises to revolutionize how we interact with technology and manage our daily routines. In this article, we delve into the features, potential impacts, and future prospects of this unique invention.

The post Innovative Phone Toasters Debut at CES 2025 appeared first on Tech Tomorrow.

Transcending Worldly Affairs Through Krishna’s Mercy
→ Dandavats

HH Mukunda Goswami discusses Srimad Bhagavatam 3.21.17, emphasizing the liberation attained by devotees who give up worldly affairs and take shelter in Krishna’s lotus feet. He elaborates on material existence, devotional service, and the importance of discussing Krishna’s pastimes. He also highlights Srila Prabhupada’s vision for Back to Godhead magazine to engage with contemporary issues
Read More...

Why bad things happen to good people?
→ Dandavats

Translation Within Your mind there can be no such differentiation as “This one is mine, and that is another’s,” because You are the Supreme Absolute Truth, the Soul of all beings, always equipoised and enjoying transcendental happiness within Yourself. Just like the heavenly desire tree, You bless all who properly worship You, granting their desired
Read More...

Dell Ends XPS Brand Amidst Product Line Restructuring
→ Tech Tomorrow

In a move that has sent ripples through the tech community, Dell has announced the end of its XPS brand, a decision that marks a significant shift in the company's product line and overall strategy. The XPS series, known for its high-performance laptops and desktops, has been a cornerstone of Dell's consumer and professional offerings for over a decade. This article delves into the reasons behind this decision, the potential implications for both consumers and the tech industry, and what the future might hold for Dell.

The post Dell Ends XPS Brand Amidst Product Line Restructuring appeared first on Tech Tomorrow.

Uniting the World Through Live To Give 2024, January 30
→ Dandavats

By Dandavats Staff Writer

India Offering Live To Give 2024. WSN December 2024 - World Sankirtan Newsletter. Change the World – Become a More Effective Sankirtan Warrior! Australia Offering Live To Give 2024 Canada Offering Live To Give 2024 Europe Offering Live To Give 2024 FIJI Offering Live To Give 2024 India Offering Live To Give 2024 Latin America Offering Live To Give 2024 London Offering Live To Give 2024 Madhya Purva Desh Offering Live To Give 2024 New Zealand Offering Live To Give 2024 United States Offering Live To Give 2024 Continue reading "Uniting the World Through Live To Give 2024, January 30
→ Dandavats"

Samsung Announces The Frame Pro TV with Enhanced Features
→ Tech Tomorrow

Technology and artistry have often been seen as separate entities, but Samsung is now merging these two worlds with the launch of the The Frame Pro TV. This advanced television is not just a display for your favorite shows and movies; it's a piece of art that can transform your living space into a gallery. In this comprehensive article, we will dive deep into the features, design, and technological advancements that set The Frame Pro TV apart from its predecessors and competitors.

The post Samsung Announces The Frame Pro TV with Enhanced Features appeared first on Tech Tomorrow.

WSN December 2024 – World Sankirtan Newsletter
→ Dandavats

By Vijaya Das

For the year 2024, we're not surprised. Mayapur was No. 1 for the year, with Jayapataka Swami's steady team of book distributors going out and giving the mercy of Krsna. They did 1,819,832 book points! May Jayapataka Swami live a long life! He's such an inspiration to devotees worldwide. The Srila Prabhupada marathon in December was another incredible victory for Lord Caitanya's sankirtana movement. The Chowpatty temple in Mumbai was the No. 1 temple worldwide in December. "The simple temple," as it is known, is also a fired-up book distribution center. Continue reading "WSN December 2024 – World Sankirtan Newsletter
→ Dandavats"

Raghunatha Dasa Goswami Appearance
→ Ramai Swami

Raghunatha Dasa was born around 1416 Shaka (1494 AD) in the town of Saptagram in Hooghly district of West Bengal. He was the only son of his father Govardhana Majumdar a wealthy landlord of the area. 

Govardhana Majumdar’s elder brother was Hiranya Majumdar who had no male progeny. Hence Raghunatha Dasa was the sole inheritor of the vast fortune the brothers had accumulated.

Both his father and uncle were devoted to Lord Chaitanya and revered Advaita Acharya. This was because of the influence of their family priest Balarama Acharya. When Raghunatha was still a young boy, Balarama Acharya hosted the great Acharya of the Holy Name, Haridasa Thakura at his village Candapura, which was within the jurisdiction of Saptagrama. 

Raghunatha used to visit Haridasa Thakura every day. Being naturally compassionate, Haridasa Thakura showered his mercy on the young Raghunatha. It was due to this mercy that Raghunatha later attained the shelter of Lord Chaitanya.

Raghunatha got his first opportunity to see Lord Chaitanya when the Lord, after accepting sannyasa, came to Shantipura and stayed at the residence of Advaita Acharya. Since Govardhana and Hiranaya Majumdar always served Advaita Acharya with great faith and devotion, he was naturally inclined to give His mercy to their boy Raghunatha. Thus, He gave the remnants of the Lord’s food to Raghunatha for as long as the Lord stayed at Shantipura. After staying in Shantipura for some time, the Lord departed for Jagannatha Puri.

Raghunatha Dasa stayed in Puri for 16 years till Lord Chaitanya and His chief confidante Svarupa Damodara disappeared from worldly vision. When this happened Raghunatha Dasa unable to bear their separation, left Puri to commit suicide in Vrindavan. There he met Srila Rupa and Sanatana Goswami who convinced him to serve Lord Chaitanya by relating His Puri pastimes to them.

Sri Raghunatha Dasa Goswami resided at Radha Kund and was responsible for getting Radha and Shyam Kund enlarged and finished with steps for devotees to take holy dips there.

In the Gaura Gannodesha Dipika, Sri Raghunatha Dasa Goswami is revealed to be a Manjari called Rasa Manjari. Other names for this Manjari are Rati Manjari and Bhanumati.

Iskcon’s spreading Krishna’s Love and Wisdom Worldwide, January 29
→ Dandavats

By Dandavats Staff Writer

Sumptuous Prasadam at Mahakhumbh2025. Celebrating Success: Reflections on ISKCON UK Marathon. Urgency of Surrender to Krishna. I am not these senses... Looking for the Supreme God. The First Meeting - Ultadanga, Kolkata, The advantage of worshiping the Supreme Person, Unlock Wisdom with The Gita Companion. Saturday joy overload @ Radhadesh Mellows. Triggers of Transformation. Bhajana Rahasya. Iskcon Tokyo - New Gaya Japan Continue reading "Iskcon’s spreading Krishna’s Love and Wisdom Worldwide, January 29
→ Dandavats"

The First Meeting – Ultadanga, Kolkata
→ Dandavats

HH Indradyumna Swami: We recently visited Ultadanga, the sacred place where Srila Prabhupada first met his eternal spiritual master, Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura. It was during this profound encounter that Abhay Charan, as he was known at the time, offered his obeisances and received the life-changing instruction to spread Krishna Consciousness in the English language.
Read More...

Celebrating Success: Reflections on ISKCON UK 2024/25 Book Distribution Marathon Festival
→ Dandavats

More photos: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/152kM0Yf09npj2PlpZi8whGEQj0cyXpkO This year, our community gathered with immense enthusiasm and devotion to celebrate the remarkable achievements of our 2024 Book Distribution Marathon. The festival, held at the Bhaktivedanta Manor on 25 January 2025, brought together devotees from UK and Ireland uniting us in the spirit of Sankirtan and the glorious mission of spreading
Read More...

Uniting Hearts: Celebrating Bhakti and Enlightenment Worldwide, January 28
→ Dandavats

By Dandavats Staff Writer

SB Class by HG Mahamaya Mataji and HG Jayagauri Mataji. The Svayambhuva devastation. Insights into Near- Death Experiences and Consciousness. Forbidden Archeology NewsFLASH. Sri Nandanandana Dasa Reflects on Padma Shri Recognition. The duty of the King. Like Fire in Gunpowder. IGF team donates Braille Bhagavad-gita. The Seven Perfections of Chanting. The Purpose of the Vedas. Celebrating the Spirit of Unity! Continue reading "Uniting Hearts: Celebrating Bhakti and Enlightenment Worldwide, January 28
→ Dandavats"

Like Fire in Gunpowder
→ Dandavats

HG Kalakantha Prabhu discusses SB 1.10.7-12, exploring the Bhagavatam’s context and Krishna’s departure from Hastinapur. He highlights devotees’ deep attachment to Krishna, the transformative power of devotional service, and the process of awakening love for Krishna through chanting and hearing. The talk reflects on material life’s limitations and the joy of spiritual fulfillment.
Read More...

The duty of the King
→ Dandavats

Translation Śrī Yudhiṣṭhira said: O Govinda, I desire to worship Your auspicious, opulent expansions by the Rājasūya sacrifice, the king of Vedic ceremonies. Please make our endeavor a success, my Lord. Purport Śrīla Śrīdhara Svāmī states that the word vibhūtīḥ refers to Lord Kṛṣṇa’s expansions (aṁśān), and Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura further explains that here
Read More...

Exploring the Beyond: Insights into Near-Death Experiences and Consciousness
→ Dandavats

In Episode 2 of *The Insight Stream: Science Meets Philosophy*, guest speaker Dr. Louis Ritz presents a captivating exploration of near-death experiences (NDEs), drawing on neuroscience, spirituality, and ancient wisdom. Host Bob Cohen guides the discussion, with Dr. Ken Cusi as the guest interviewer. Dr. Ritz delves into the phenomena of NDEs, emphasizing shifts in
Read More...

Is Bhumi external energy or internal energy?
→ The Spiritual Scientist

Is Bhumi external material energy or internal spiritual energy?

The question about Bhumi’s nature—whether she is part of material energy or a divine consort of the Lord—can be explored through various perspectives present in the Vedic tradition. Here’s an explanation that incorporates these viewpoints while maintaining their distinctions.

  1. Different worldviews in the Vedic tradition
    The Bhagavad-Gita (7.4) describes Bhumi as one of the material elements (earth), essential for sustaining life. This view comes from the analytical perspective of Sankhya philosophy, which focuses on the composition and functioning of the material world.
    However, within the bhakti worldview, Bhumi is personified as Bhumi Devi, a goddess who is a divine consort of the Lord. These perspectives—material element versus divine personhood—stem from different approaches to understanding the world and complement rather than contradict each other.
  2. Material and spiritual manifestations in this world
    When transcendental or spiritual entities manifest in the material world, there is always a material side to their manifestation. For example:

Rivers like the Yamuna are composed of water, a material element, yet they are also revered as goddesses in Vedic tradition. Yamuna Devi is considered a consort of the Lord and is worshipped for her divine qualities. At the same time, the physical river can be polluted and needs to be cared for, showing the dual aspects of its material and spiritual nature.

Similarly, the deities in temples are made of materials like stone, wood, or metal, yet they are revered as spiritual entities. While their material composition is functionally acknowledged (e.g., the deity can be damaged by water), it becomes subordinate to their spiritual significance. This is similar to how a currency note is technically just paper, but its true value lies in what it represents.

  1. Reconciling divine personalities with their material manifestations
    Divine personalities like Bhumi Devi often have multiple roles that span both the material and spiritual domains. Bhumi Devi is a goddess and a consort of the Lord, but she is also Bhumi, the earth element, within the material creation. Attempting to reconcile these roles with finite human intelligence can be challenging.
    For example, rivers like Yamuna flow on Bhumi, the earth. While Yamuna Devi is a goddess, her physical manifestation as a river is part of the material creation flowing on another divine manifestation, Bhumi Devi. This interplay of divine identities within the material domain can seem complex, but it ultimately aims to direct human consciousness toward the divine.
  2. Points to consider when approaching this question

Different worldviews in the Vedic tradition serve different purposes. Sankhya focuses on analyzing material nature, while bhakti emphasizes divine personhood and relationships.

Divine manifestations in the material world always have a material aspect, but this aspect is secondary to their spiritual identity. For example, the pollution of a river or damage to a deity is a material concern, but their divine essence remains unaffected.

Reconciling the spiritual and material roles of divine personalities may be limited by human understanding. The essential takeaway is to focus on how these manifestations guide us toward the divine.

Summary
Bhumi can be understood as both external material energy and internal spiritual energy, depending on the perspective. From the analytical perspective of Sankhya, she is a material element, essential for sustaining life. From the devotional perspective of bhakti, she is a goddess and consort of the Lord. While these perspectives may seem different, they ultimately harmonize in directing our consciousness toward the divine.

The post Is Bhumi external energy or internal energy? appeared first on The Spiritual Scientist.

Together We Shine: Smashing Goals for a Brighter Tomorrow, January 27
→ Dandavats

By Dandavats Staff Writer

Srila Prabhupada Lilamrita. Smashed the goal for the Live to Give Campaign! 4.541.341 Bhagavad Gitas! Thought provoking statisticsStrength from Above. What Abortionists Don't Know. Possessiveness, for a grihastha. Strict discipline in the matter of moral and immoral activities. London Saturday Night Harinama. Insights from ISKCON Radhadesh. The "bum" who remembered "Swamiji". Krishna conscious not "complaint conscious". The poison of material enjoyment. Continue reading "Together We Shine: Smashing Goals for a Brighter Tomorrow, January 27
→ Dandavats"

Part 3: Those 18 Days @ Mahabharat – HG Chaitanya Charan Prabhuji @ Bhakti Center Gachibowli
→ The Spiritual Scientist

Today, we will look at the 11th, 12th, and 13th days. If we have time, we will also cover the 14th day. Each day, I will focus on one particular theme. The theme we discussed previously was the tension between dharma and bhakti. Today, we will explore the theme of right and wrong actions.

When we talk about actions, how do we determine whether someone’s action is right or wrong? Is it a moral judgment or a matter of functionality? For instance, when someone makes a decision, we could evaluate whether it was morally right or wrong. But we can also look at it in terms of how effective or functional the action was.

Let’s take an example: Suppose someone decides to drive a car, and something goes wrong. One of the biggest challenges in relationships, especially in a team or organization, is when one person makes a wrong decision, and the consequences affect everyone. The result can be a loss of trust in the network. How we perceive that wrong decision becomes very important.

To evaluate whether a decision was wrong, we generally look at three factors: intent, content, and consequence. These three factors help us determine whether an action was right or wrong.

When it comes to morality, we may have different conceptions based on cultural or personal backgrounds. What one culture considers moral, another may not. However, when a group of people works together, there generally needs to be some common understanding of values. For example, in a spiritual community, we may share values that discourage certain behaviors, like harming others. In other cultures or religious groups, these same actions may be accepted or even encouraged. This relativity of morality is a topic in itself, but what’s important is that a group needs some shared values to function together. Otherwise, it’s hard to predict how others will behave or respond.

For example, in a workplace, we might have personal values, but when we are at work, we share a common goal: the success of the company. We work together with a shared value of wanting the company to succeed, because in doing so, we succeed as well.

Now, when decisions go wrong, sometimes the wrong decision is largely situational. This means that the situation itself caused the decision to turn out badly. For instance, if a doctor prescribes a treatment and the treatment has a side effect or is contraindicated, leading to the patient’s condition worsening, we can say that the decision was wrong, but it may have been due to the situation, not malicious intent.

Today, we will focus on the 11th, 12th, and 13th days. If time permits, we will also cover the 14th day. Each day, I will highlight one specific theme. Previously, we discussed the tension between dharma and bhakti. Today, our focus will shift to the theme of right and wrong actions.

When we talk about actions, how do we determine whether they are right or wrong? Is it a moral judgment, or is it about functionality? For example, when someone makes a decision, we might evaluate whether it was morally right or wrong. But we can also assess it based on how effective or functional the action was.

Let’s consider an example: Suppose someone decides to drive a car, and something goes wrong. In relationships, especially in teams or organizations, one of the greatest challenges arises when one person makes a wrong decision, and everyone else has to bear the consequences. This can lead to a loss of trust within the group. How we perceive that wrong decision becomes crucial.

To evaluate whether a decision was wrong, we generally look at three factors: intent, content, and consequence. These factors help us determine whether an action was right or wrong.

When it comes to morality, different cultures or backgrounds may have varying conceptions of what is right and wrong. What one culture considers moral, another might not. However, when a group of people works together, there must be a common understanding of values. For example, in a spiritual community, we may share values that discourage behaviors like harming others. In contrast, other cultures or religious groups might accept or even encourage such behaviors. This relativity of morality is a complex topic, but the key point is that groups need shared values to function together. Without them, it becomes difficult to predict how others will act or respond.

Take the workplace, for instance. While we may have personal values, when we work together, we share a common goal: the success of the company. We unite under the value of wanting the company to succeed, as it leads to success for all of us.

Now, sometimes when decisions go wrong, the error is largely situational. This means the situation itself led to the decision turning out badly. For example, if a doctor prescribes a treatment that has a side effect or is contraindicated, and as a result, the patient’s condition worsens, we might say the decision was wrong. However, the wrongness may be attributed to the situation rather than malicious intent.

So, what can help manage a relationship? It depends on how we perceive things. For instance, let’s consider the doctor who makes a judgment call. The doctor didn’t know about the side effects, and nobody else knew either. Let’s say the doctor should have known but didn’t pay attention. That’s when the mentality of “should have” comes into play.

Now, why are we discussing this? It’s because something similar happens in the story. After Vishnu falls and Vishma makes a failed appeal, the question arises: Who will be the next commander? Immediately, the suggestion goes to Karna, who is seen as the next logical choice.

Karna, however, appreciates the honor but recognizes that his becoming the commander would create rifts in the army. He says that most of the warriors fighting on their side are students of Drona, and they do not see him as an equal due to his birth. If he is made commander, it would be seen as disrespectful to Drona. Because Drona is their guru, the warriors would not fight wholeheartedly for him. Karna suggests that the honor should be offered to Drona instead. We will talk more about Karna’s character later.

At this point, everyone knows that Duryodhana and Karna are close allies, and Duryodhana is expecting Karna to become the commander. Part of Duryodhana resents the idea that he will have to obey Karna’s command. So, when Duryodhana approaches Drona and asks him to guide his army to victory, Drona is both relieved and pleased. He says, “I am honored by this, and you may ask for a boon in return.”

Drona, eager for this opportunity, responds, “I wish for you to bring Yudhishthir to me alive.” Duryodhana’s eyes widen, surprised by the request. He says, “Is such a task really necessary? You do not want me to kill him, but to bring him alive?”

Duryodhana then explains that after observing the progress of Arjuna and Bhima over the last ten days, he has concluded that it is unlikely they can be defeated in their current state. If Yudhishthir is killed, Arjuna and Bhima will go mad with grief and destroy the entire army. His plan is to send Yudhishthir into exile for another 13 years while they consolidate their forces.

Drona shakes his head, realizing the difficulty of the task. He replies that while Arjuna is his student, he has become his equal, having learned everything that Drona taught him. Additionally, Arjuna is younger, and through his austerities, he has gained celestial weapons. If Arjuna blocks him, Drona will not be able to carry out the request. Duryodhana reassures him, saying, “Don’t worry. I will handle it.”

Duryodhana then goes to Susharman, the leader of the Samskaras. This clan has had a long-standing rivalry with Arjuna and the Pandavas for various reasons. Duryodhana sees this as an opportunity and instructs Susharman to challenge Arjuna.

So, at the start of the day, Arjuna is subjected to this challenge. One of the causes of war is that during a general conflict, one general might challenge another. Sometimes these challenges happen due to strategy, while at other times, it’s simply a matter of one general being challenged directly.

Then, the fighting continues as generals engage with each other. When Arjuna is challenged by Susharman, he moves in that direction and attacks relentlessly. Both sides have spies, and soon the Pandavas learn about the plan. They then strategize to ensure that Yudhishthir is defended. Meanwhile, Drona fights furiously.

Though Drona has been fighting valiantly throughout, he has been operating under the shadow of Vishnu’s presence. When Vishnu was on the battlefield, his presence dominated, but now, Drona’s progress seems unstoppable. As the battle intensifies, on the 11th day, Drona comes close to breaking through the Pandavas’ defenses.

Arjuna, however, is aware of what’s happening and uses celestial weapons at the last moment. He halts Susharman’s forces, rushing to the rescue of Yudhishthir. He manages to prevent Yudhishthir’s capture, but not without difficulty. On the second day, Yudhishthir tries again and gets much closer.

This time, Arjuna destroys the chariot, kills the charioteer, and almost defeats Susharman. Within moments, he neutralizes Susharman’s forces, and he arrests him. But once again, Arjuna arrives just in time to prevent Yudhishthir from being captured.

In this particular incident, not only does Arjuna win, but it also becomes a disgrace for Drona. It’s a moment when victory is snatched from the jaws of defeat—similar to how sometimes teams lose just when they are on the verge of winning, a situation that feels even more humiliating. The second day’s loss is particularly mortifying for Drona, much like his earlier encounter with Bhishma.

Drona says, “You promised me victory, and now you’re failing to fulfill that promise. I can’t believe you’re unable to defeat them. Is it because of your personal affection for them? It seems you are not fighting wholeheartedly. Please don’t let your personal feelings lead to the destruction of my entire army. I have devoted my forces to your victory. Do not let it all go to waste.”

Once again, Drona is confronted with harsh, piercing words, this time from Duryodhana: “If your heart is not in this battle, please step aside and let Karna take command.”

This is reminiscent of what Bhishma said earlier. Both Drona and Bhishma are extraordinary warriors, but there’s a key difference between them. Bhishma is also a devotee of Krishna, while Drona, though a Brahmin and trained in martial arts, is not known for his devotion. Because of this, Drona succumbs more readily to the pressure and his strategy begins to falter. His decision leads his war effort on a downward trajectory.

The next day, Drona announces that they will form a “Chakra” formation to trap Arjuna. They decide to keep this information secret. When the war begins, the initial formation seems like a typical military strategy. But soon after, Arjuna is challenged again.

Arjuna, now positioned on the sidelines, fights fiercely and is engaged in a battle with Susharman’s forces. Susharman commands a large army, but despite his strength, he is no match for Arjuna. Arjuna hopes that one day he can wipe out Susharman’s forces, which would be a significant victory in itself.

However, once Arjuna is on the sidelines of the main battle, the enemy quickly reforms their military, revealing the Chakra formation. The Pandavas regroup, and it’s now time for Arjuna to demonstrate his heroism. He is urged to dig deep and face the new threat head-on.

He is conflicted about this plan because he is young, and there is always the risk of death and injury in war. However, some missions are far more critical than others. Normally, when two warriors are fighting, if one of them gets injured, they can retreat or someone else can come to their rescue. But in this case, the stakes are much higher. Despite the risks, Bhima says, “I will do whatever you say.”

At the same time, he adds, “I must inform you that I do not know how to get out of the Chakra. Once I go in, I will be trapped.” Bhima responds, “Yes, we’ve thought about this. Our plan is, once you make the Chakra visible, we will follow you inside. This formation is indestructible from the outside, but it is vulnerable from the inside. From within, we will destroy it.”

He then challenges Drona and attacks him ferociously. Drona attempts to counter, but Bhima dodges his attack and moves toward the vulnerable points of the formation. Bhima successfully breaks through the Chakra and marches in. But what does breaking the Chakra mean? It means that the soldiers in the formation are positioned in such a way that each set of soldiers must hold their ground, no matter what happens.

The formation consists of several layers of soldiers: one set in front, followed by others, each set reinforcing the previous one. Powerful generals support each set. The soldiers are told to hold their positions at all costs. However, there are weak points in the formation where the soldiers can be vulnerable to attacks. Bhima’s attack is so intense that the warriors, even the ordinary soldiers, cannot hold their ground. This leads to the formation beginning to break apart.

When the Chakra begins to break, the Pandavas’ plan seems to be working, and they are close to succeeding. But then, unexpectedly, Jayadratha enters the battlefield. Up until now, Jayadratha has been a relatively unknown warrior. In fact, at the beginning of the battle, when the warriors are introduced, there is no mention of Jayadratha at all. Even in the first chapter, he is not mentioned when the warriors’ ranks are described.

It’s interesting because Krishna had mentioned earlier that the deaths of all these warriors were preordained by him. But Jayadratha, although not a formidable threat, surprises everyone by standing his ground. He’s ready to face death.

Jayadratha has a history with the Pandavas. Though he is a relative—he is the brother of the wife of one of the Pandavas—he has a troubling past. Once, while traveling through the forest, he happened to pass by the area where the Pandavas were staying. There, he saw Draupadi, who was collecting flowers for a fire sacrifice.

Seeing her beauty, he became infatuated. He tried to abduct her, even though he knew she was married to the Pandavas, who were powerful and related to him. Draupadi screamed for help, and the Pandavas, upon learning of this, defeated him and arrested him. Bhima wanted to kill him immediately, but Arjuna intervened. Arjuna said, “Let’s take him to the king and see what he decides.”

This is a serious crime, especially in a society where abduction is seen as a grave offense. One of the worst types of aggressors is someone who abducts a woman. When Yudhishthira hears of this, he wants to kill Jayadratha, but he’s a relative of theirs, so he decides to warn him instead of killing him.

To make sure Jayadratha learns a lesson and remembers his wrongdoing, the Pandavas decide to shave off his hair. This act is not just humiliating; it symbolizes that Jayadratha has been defeated and acknowledges that he is now subordinate to the Pandavas. However, instead of accepting his mistake, Jayadratha feels wronged by this humiliation.

In anger, he performs severe austerities to please Lord Shiva, hoping for vengeance. When Lord Shiva appears, Jayadratha asks for the power to kill the Pandavas. Lord Shiva warns him that Arjuna is protected by Krishna, and the Pandavas are all under Krishna’s protection. Despite Jayadratha’s devotion and austerities, Shiva says, “I cannot grant you this boon. However, I can grant you one boon: you will be able to hold back and defeat all the Pandavas, except Arjuna.”

Jayadratha keeps this boon secret, and when the battle intensifies, he uses this power to hold off the Pandavas. As the battle rages on, the Kauravas cheer, and the Pandavas begin to panic. Bhima, in particular, fights with great fury, but he is much more skilled with a mace than with a bow and arrow. Despite his efforts, he is unable to break through Jayadratha’s defense.

As the Pandavas watch in increasing horror, Jayadratha’s attack becomes so fierce that the Pandava forces begin to retreat. Meanwhile, Abhimanyu, who is caught up in the heat of battle, charges into the enemy ranks. He doesn’t realize he’s separated from his allies and is soon trapped inside the Kaurava formation.

Despite being surrounded, Abhimanyu fights valiantly. He defeats many prominent warriors, including Drona, Karna, and Dushasana. However, Karna, feeling humiliated by his inability to defeat Arjuna, decides to go to Duryodhana for advice. Karna, a great archer, has never led a large army before, but he’s determined to find a way to defeat the Pandavas.

In some versions of the story, Shakuni is the one who suggests a dark plan, but in the main version, Karna and Duryodhana come up with the idea to attack Abhimanyu while he’s alone. They know the young warrior is trapped and is fighting valiantly, but they also see an opportunity to defeat him.

As Karna and Duryodhana prepare their attack, they’re able to hold back the Pandavas. Abhimanyu fights as fiercely as he can, but he’s eventually overwhelmed by the sheer numbers and tactics of the Kauravas. His death is a significant turning point in the war, one that further fuels the Pandavas’ determination.

The whole situation exemplifies the difference between virtuous and vicious actions. The Pandavas, despite their setbacks, remain committed to righteousness, while the Kauravas resort to deceit and treachery. The story also demonstrates the importance of boundaries in conflict. Winning is important, but crossing certain ethical lines—such as poisoning food or attacking someone who is already defeated—would be a violation of the boundaries that define honorable conduct.

“I’m not going for it. I want to succeed, but I won’t go any further than this.” In office politics, sometimes you network with certain people, or you may align with someone to rise up. But sometimes, you end up speaking negatively about others. Those things happen, but no matter what we do, we should never bring up someone’s family or spread rumors about them. There are boundaries.

A person’s character is often revealed by their boundaries. We can all be good when things are going well, but in bad moments, we may show some flaws. We might get angry or yell. But even in our worst moments, there are still boundaries we should not cross.

Unfortunately, when a person’s character is questionable, their boundaries become more flexible, more easily crossed. This is what happens with Duryodhana. He and his allies plan their attack on the Pandavas. For years, they fight against one warrior at a time and defeat them, but now, six warriors team up to attack Arjuna’s son, Abhimanyu.

One warrior destroys Abhimanyu’s chariot, another cuts off his bowstring, and yet another breaks his weapons. Abhimanyu, now helpless, jumps off his chariot, picks up a mace, and starts fighting with it. He even picks up a wheel and begins rolling it around to strike the enemy soldiers.

But his strength is running out. His mace breaks, and his wheel is destroyed by the enemy’s attacks. Finally, Dushasana’s son challenges him to a duel. The two fight fiercely, dodging blows and countering each other’s attacks. But eventually, both warriors land powerful blows that cause them to fall to the ground. While neither is severely injured, the impact of the fight leaves Abhimanyu exhausted.

He struggles to get up, but Dushasana’s son picks up his mace and delivers the final blow to Abhimanyu’s head, killing him. The Kauravas celebrate, but it is a hollow victory. Their actions are cowardly, and deep down, they know it. The victory is not one to be proud of.

As the Kauravas celebrate, Duryodhana has a growing sense of dread. He knew what would likely happen when the Chakravyuha closed around Abhimanyu. And when he hears the celebrations, his worst fear is confirmed. Not only does he feel distressed about the death of Abhimanyu, but he is also haunted by the thought of how he will face Arjuna and explain what happened to his son. His mind drifts back to the court, where everything began.

Arjuna had endured a long and hard day. He had thought that one more day in Shishupala’s army would soon be over, and he would be coming back. However, as he returns, a strange sensation washes over him—something feels off, something ominous.

Normally, when warriors return after a battle, there is celebratory music and cheers to lift their spirits. But on this day, as he approaches the camp, he is struck by an eerie silence. The camp is unusually quiet. No soldiers greet him, no one salutes him. The pit in his stomach grows deeper with every step.

In the heat of battle, if there had been a crisis—like the day before—he would have been informed. He would have been called to restrategize. But nothing had happened this day. As he walks in, his eyes immediately fall on the throne where he would sit. But that throne is empty.

The sight of the empty throne nearly causes Arjuna to collapse. He struggles to hold himself together, unwilling to believe what he is seeing. His head drops, and tears begin to stream down his face. No words need to be spoken—his expression says it all.

“I do not understand what happened,” Arjuna murmurs, and then, broken, he crumbles to the ground, crying out, “Abhimanyu! Abhimanyu! Abhimanyu!”

He feels the pain, not only because of the death of his son, but because he believes that his pursuit of individual glory led him to ignore his son’s need for him. He had gone off to destroy Shishupala’s army while his son was left to die. Abhimanyu would have called for him in his last moments, and Arjuna had not been there for him.

The wise and compassionate Dhrishtadyumna steps forward slowly and explains what happened. Arjuna listens, still crying, overwhelmed by grief and rage. In his anguish, he lashes out.

He looks at Dhrishtadyumna and says, “When bad things happen, the unwise act in ways that make things worse, while the wise act in ways that make things better.”

Dhrishtadyumna, heavy with sorrow, responds, “Arjuna, look at the faces of your brothers. They mourn Abhimanyu’s death just as you do. Please, do not speak words that will add to our pain. Philosophy and wisdom may support a person in times of sorrow, but right now, we must support each other with compassion.”

Arjuna continues to lament, deeply shaken, but Krishna’s wisdom soon resonates in his heart. Krishna teaches that while we are all souls at our core, we are also connected by the relationships we form in this lifetime. With relationships come responsibilities, and when those responsibilities are tied with emotions, they cannot be dismissed easily. It is natural for a person to grieve the loss of someone they love.

For some time, Arjuna weeps, reflecting on Krishna’s words and his own actions, as he tries to come to terms with the loss.

Yesterday, we discussed how sometimes when something bad happens, we try to understand both the cause and the cure. In general, when we act, the cause of something can have multiple levels. We need to identify those levels. For example, if I’m feeling cold right now, it could be because the fan is on. Or maybe I’m not wearing warm clothes, or maybe my body isn’t well-suited to the climate. It could also be that the place is actually very cold. There can be many causes for what’s happening, and intelligence means we need to identify the actionable cause so we can address it.

Now, like I said yesterday, sometimes a guest comes to our house, and we tell them, “This world is filled with suffering,” and they ask, “What happened here?” The causes of suffering often have multiple layers, so we need to identify them.

For instance, why am I feeling bored? It might be because of climate change or perhaps something else. There could be different levels of cause. If someone is suffering, one possible cause might be past karma, but that might not be the actionable cause in the present situation. When dealing with a situation, we focus on finding an actionable cause.

Of course, what is considered “actionable” can differ from person to person, but we must try to arrive at some consensus. As Arjuna listens to this, he starts processing everything and realizes that he feels guilty. This brings us to an earlier incident that reveals Yudhishthira’s character.

Yudhishthira’s reaction to Abhimanyu’s death doesn’t come at the very end of the day. It’s before the day ends, when he becomes so overwhelmed with grief that he feels it’s his duty, as a king, to protect his people. He says, “I will charge into the enemy ranks to avenge Abhimanyu’s death, or I will die trying.” He feels that he cannot face Arjuna after what has happened.

At this point, Krishna appears. He stops Yudhishthira and tells him that the situation, although tragic, is not his fault. He tells him to pause and reflect. Yudhishthira, consumed by guilt, says that he feels responsible for the death, and Krishna reminds him that calamity strikes everyone, even virtuous people. He advises Yudhishthira not to lose his sense of purpose and assures him that victory is near. In a few days, he will be enthroned as king, and things will improve.

The point I’m making is that Yudhishthira feels guilty, and this shows that he is a conscientious and responsible person. Whenever something goes wrong, some people try to blame others, while others take responsibility even when it’s not theirs to take. Arjuna is feeling guilty about Abhimanyu’s death, and this vulnerability in Yudhishthira makes Arjuna’s words hurt even more.

He was mean-spirited. He could have used his weapon at any time, but he chose to use it at this particular moment, and he became the cause of Abhimanyu’s death. Although the final blow was struck by someone else, he felt that Abhimanyu’s fate was sealed the moment Jayadratha blocked the Pandavas. Therefore, he decided that he would take revenge. He vowed to kill Jayadratha before sunset the next day. He even declared, “If I do not accomplish this, I will enter fire and end my life.”

The mood on the Pandava side was grim, but when Arjuna took this vow, the entire atmosphere shifted. It became almost celebratory. The Pandavas knew that if Arjuna took such a vow, he would succeed. Now, the Kauravas, led by Jayadratha, were thinking that it might be impossible for Arjuna to cross the Kaurava army with their forces in place, but they were also aware that Arjuna was not alone.

Arjuna’s resolve was certain, and although Jayadratha’s fate seemed sealed, he still took precautions. This brings us to the initial discussion. We talked about how this situation could have created a rift between Arjuna and Yudhishthira. It was Yudhishthira’s decision to activate the Chakravyuha, and Arjuna could have criticized him for it. While there was some passing criticism, it was circumstantial. Was it an ill-motivated decision? Certainly not. Was it a decision that indicated incompetence? Not really. It was a reasonable strategy in an emergency. If someone had known that this strategy would have sidelined someone else and still proceeded without considering the consequences, then it would have been a bad decision.

Now, sometimes what happens is that when someone makes a decision, if we have a negative view of that person, we ascribe the most negative cause to their actions. The more we think negatively, the more it erodes trust. So, in this case, while it was a bad decision in terms of the outcome, it wasn’t necessarily a bad decision in intention.

When we discuss this, we see that sometimes a right action leads to the right result. However, life is so complex that a right action can sometimes lead to the wrong result, and a wrong action might lead to the right result. This is where serendipity comes into play. If we rush to judgment, assuming that a particular action reflects someone’s character or capability, we may be mistaken.

In this case, Arjuna made the decision, and Yudhishthira supported it. Interestingly, Krishna was not entirely happy with this. Krishna told Arjuna that he understood the cause behind the vow and supported it publicly, but privately, he expressed concern. Krishna said, “I cannot understand your anxiety. You know my power, and I know your power.” When they reached the battlefield, Arjuna arrived on his chariot, and Krishna instructed him, “Keep my chariot ready with all my best weapons.”

He said, “If Arjuna is not able to reach Jayadratha, then I will jump from my chariot and destroy the entire army.”

The next day, when the battle began, the army seemed to stretch to the horizon, with various military formations set in place. One formation in particular was designed in such a way that the entire army extended for miles, and at the back of it, Jayadratha was out of sight.

Arjuna looked at the vast expanse and thought, “I don’t see how I can break through this, but I will reach Jayadratha.”

The day’s war began. Arjuna charged forward, and Drona stood at the front of the formation. Arjuna and Drona started fighting fiercely, and their battle went on for hours. At one point, Krishna told Arjuna, “Your fight with Drona could go on all day, but you don’t have time for this.”

Suddenly, Arjuna shot a flurry of arrows that temporarily stunned Drona. Krishna took Arjuna’s chariot, steered it around Drona’s stand, and charged ahead. By the time Drona recovered, he called out, “Arjuna, where are you going? Have you become a coward? Fight me!”

Krishna continued to drive the chariot forward, positioning himself close to Jayadratha. He knew that Arjuna would have to fight through countless soldiers before he could reach Jayadratha.

Meanwhile, there was a warrior named Shalyayush, who was given a magical mace by Varuna. Anyone struck by this mace would be killed instantly. Shalyayush, unable to match Arjuna in archery, decided to fight him with the mace. As he tried to strike Arjuna, his blows missed, and instead, he accidentally hit Krishna.

Now, Shalyayush had been warned about the mace—if he hit a non-combatant with it, the mace would turn on him. In the heat of battle, he forgot this warning and struck Krishna. The moment the mace hit Krishna, it slipped from his hand and turned around, hitting Shalyayush instead, causing him injury.

Meanwhile, the Kaurava forces, unable to stop Arjuna, began to flee. Arjuna was unstoppable—he had always been formidable, but the death of Abhimanyu had made him even more powerful. As he pushed forward, the Kaurava forces couldn’t hold him back, and they broke ranks in fear.

Watching from the sidelines, the Kaurava leaders realized that Arjuna’s momentum was unstoppable. They had kept a significant number of their forces engaged at different points, but Arjuna was breaking through their defenses. One leader, thinking he might be able to face Arjuna, said, “I am not afraid of even Indra, but I will not face his son in battle.” He then came up with a plan.

He had a mystical armor that could protect anyone who wore it from arrows. He decided to give this armor to one of his warriors, believing it would protect him against Arjuna’s arrows. The warrior was pleased and went forward with the armor, thinking it would shield him completely.

However, Arjuna, who knew the intricacies of battle, understood that no matter how powerful an arrangement was, there would always be some loophole. He knew the armor would protect the body, but it left the tip of the fingers vulnerable. Arjuna carefully aimed his arrows at the warrior’s fingers, knowing this would be the key to defeating him.

The warrior, thinking himself invincible due to the armor, continued forward, unaware of Arjuna’s strategy. Arjuna fired, striking the vulnerable tip of the warrior’s fingers and breaking through the armor’s protection.

At this point, Arjuna’s forces had broken through the Kaurava ranks, and Krishna observed that it was time to send someone to assist. He turned to Satyaki and said, “Satyaki, you please go and support Arjuna in this moment of need.”

And you assist your teacher. Satyaki is with him because before Arjuna left, he told him to stay by his side to protect him. He knew that while he was focused on trying to reach Jayadratha, the enemy might spring a surprise attack. Satyaki says, “I’ve been told to stay by your side.”

Arjuna responds, “Be my ally here. All other warriors are there to protect me. You are needed much more elsewhere. Try to clear some of the enemies, there are too many attacking me.”

Once Satyaki goes in, Arjuna becomes further concerned. He thinks, “Satyaki is quite young, and if he stays and helps me, he might get trapped.” So, he looks around and sees one warrior who is ready for action—Bhima. He asks, “Can you go and help them? I was waiting for you.”

Arjuna knows that this places a heavy burden on Bhima, but he continues to push forward. Bhima and Karna engage in multiple encounters. There are two occasions when Bhima gets the upper hand over Karna, and one occasion when Karna could have killed Bhima, but doesn’t.

In this case, Bhima matches Karna arrow for arrow, and Karna is completely caught up in the fight with Bhima, which allows Arjuna to move forward.

As Arjuna relentlessly moves forward, breaking through the ranks of the enemies, the Kaurava army watches in increasing disbelief and fear. What they thought would be a certain victory is turning into a devastating defeat. The words of Duryodhana, which must have echoed in his mind, come to the forefront: “How is it possible that one warrior can destroy my entire army?”

The nature of the world is such that if someone wants to believe in a higher power, they will find enough evidence in the organization and exquisiteness of the world to infer the existence of God. But if someone is determined to be an atheist, they can find reasons to come to that conclusion as well.

For example, when we talk about how rainfall occurs—how clouds are formed and how all living beings on the land benefit from rain—it may seem like a divine mechanism. But if we question why rain also falls on oceans, we may argue that the system is not perfectly tailored for our needs alone. Similarly, Duryodhana previously had six warriors stopping Arjuna, and now he orders for eight to hold him back. He also sends Drona and Kripa, shooting arrows in all directions, just to halt Arjuna’s overwhelming onslaught.

Despite their efforts, Arjuna continues to advance, knowing that he has the strength and purpose to succeed. Krishna sees Arjuna’s determination and decides to intervene. Krishna then calls out to him, “Arjuna, are you going to let them kill me? Should I like your funeral pyre?”

In dejection, Arjuna begins to lower his bow.

But Krishna speaks to him in a voice full of resolve and urgency. “It is not now. Place the bow down.” Krishna then pulls Arjuna’s focus toward a nearby place where he can see the image of his father, Rudra. Rudra had meditated and received a blessing that whoever causes his son’s head to fall to the ground would be destroyed.

Arjuna knows that if he releases this arrow, it will bring an end to Jayadratha’s reign. He pulls the bowstring and places the arrow on the bow, preparing to take the shot.

And at that very moment, Krishna speaks to Arjuna. The sun tries to reach its sword, but the arrow comes flying so fast that it hits Jayadratha right in front of the eyes of all the Kaurava warriors. His head is carried far into the sky. In this moment, Krishna protects Arjuna.

Not only from the danger of not reaching his goal, but also from dangers that we don’t even know exist. Krishna protects us from the dangers we are aware of and the ones we aren’t. As Jayadratha’s body falls, the Kaurava army laments, and Krishna and Arjuna embrace each other in victory. They know that this has turned out to be their greatest triumph.

From the Kaurava perspective, the victory is morally shattering. The optics of the situation show that the day before, they had to use unethical means to kill one warrior, and today, they couldn’t stop a single warrior from reaching another warrior and ending his life. How could they fight against the entire army after this?

After this victory, the morale of the Kaurava forces was shattered. This happened on the 14th evening, and there were four more days of war left. The key takeaway is that even after a painful loss, one must not let it divert them or discourage them from their purpose.

When faced with a big loss, we can take solace in knowing that Krishna is preparing us for a much bigger victory. Arjuna maintains his faith and determination, and we can pray that Krishna grants us similar faith and determination when we face losses. Krishna does not promise Arjuna that he will never face problems in life. And that is the faith we should carry forward from this traumatic and intense experience on the battlefield of Kurukshetra.

To summarize, today we discussed three main points. First, we discussed right and wrong actions and how they can be evaluated based on morality and functionality. Sometimes, actions may seem functionally wrong but without a moral dimension—just a wrong decision that, in hindsight, we need to let go of. When results don’t turn out as expected, we shouldn’t hold them against the person involved. Sometimes, a wrong decision is based on a lack of competence, and in that case, adjustments should be made.

If the wrong decision is based on character, however, then that person might need to be let go. Sometimes, bad things happen, and we need to accept them.

We also discussed the incident of Abhimanyu’s heroism and his death. His death wasn’t the result of a wrong strategy, but rather an unexpected factor. Arjuna, instead of being discouraged, focused on a clear course of action—targeting Jayadratha. Through this, Krishna guided Arjuna all the way.

Krishna was more anxious than Arjuna, but he provided guidance that brought them all together. Krishna’s protection comes at multiple levels. Just when a goal seems unreachable, Krishna intervenes. When a danger is invisible, Krishna also protects us from it. His protection is not just in overcoming an unreachable goal but also in shielding us from unseen perils.

One failure can often be a step toward a bigger success. This past time illustrates many things, but one key lesson is that when we do all we can, Krishna steps in and does what we cannot. Arjuna had done all he could to reach Jayadratha, and when he couldn’t, Krishna intervened and made the impossible possible.

Let us pray that, through these dramatic pastimes, our faith in Krishna increases, and even when we face setbacks, we can remain determined and confident that Krishna will guide us to greater success through the challenges we encounter.

Yes, and now, Pravid is here, just a few feet away, conducting this session day after day. He is extending himself to share his wisdom. One of the things Pravid told me, which I want to share with all of you, is that he enjoys the attention of the audience. And we are all part of this experience.

The post Part 3: Those 18 Days @ Mahabharat – HG Chaitanya Charan Prabhuji @ Bhakti Center Gachibowli appeared first on The Spiritual Scientist.

Part 2: Those 18 Days @ Mahabharat – HG Chaitanya Charan Prabhuji @ Bhakti Center Gachibowli
→ The Spiritual Scientist

Welcome again to the second day of our book discussion, Chitra. I notice some people are missing today for various reasons, but we also have new participants joining us. This series was originally planned for the mornings, but we’ve extended it to include evenings as well. There was a suggestion that we should only focus on the war during the daytime, but we realized that many of us have questions, and the time we had originally planned wasn’t enough to address them all.

So, the format for today will be slightly adjusted. We’ll continue with our series, and tomorrow (Monday), Tuesday, Wednesday, and Friday, we’ll have morning sessions here in this same place. Today, Progyny will continue with the discussion, diving deeper into the topics of Arjuna, Abhimanyu, and Karuna, among others. Progyny has already given us a good preview of what to expect.

The good news is that next Sunday, Progyny will continue the same discussions. After that, we’ll likely wrap up by the following Monday, and by then, everyone will have left, I think.

Let me quickly recap what we’ve covered so far. We’re focusing on the 18-day war, specifically some key incidents, and analyzing the characters to see what lessons we can learn from them. We’re also addressing some controversial aspects of their actions. Right now, we’re looking at the actions of Bhishma.

The first eight days of the war were a seesaw affair. Initially, the Kauravas had the upper hand, then the Pandavas took control. Bhishma made a vow to kill the five Pandavas or their five arrows, but Arjuna, at Krishna’s request, turned the tide. Bhishma then declared that he would kill Arjuna unless Shikhandi was involved, and fought with great vigor, eager to see how Krishna would intervene to protect Arjuna.

However, Arjuna was hesitant, not wanting to kill his grandfather. Krishna then stepped in, urging Arjuna not to break his vow. At that point, Krishna turned toward Bhishma and held him responsible for not stopping the war. This was a pivotal moment, as it almost ended the war right there, with the sun nearly setting.

We paused the discussion at this point to explore Bhishma’s character. We examined his actions through a framework of four quadrants: virtue (dharma) on one side and devotion (bhakti) on the other. Bhishma was always devoted to Vishnu, but his sense of dharma was more complicated. For example, his silence during the dishonoring of Draupadi was a questionable act, and we discussed how, despite being dharmic, his actions didn’t always align with righteousness.

Now, as we contrast Bhishma with Karuna, we’ll see that Karuna, too, had a strong sense of dharma but was often caught between conflicting duties and emotions. This brings us to the more complex nature of dharma and its interpretations, which we will continue to explore.

He never had bhakti, but through his association with Duryodhana, he descended further. However, they knew that Arjuna’s determination alone wouldn’t be enough to defeat Bhishma, who was not easily killed. Before the war began, there had been multiple pauses. One was when Arjuna felt that he had made his decision, and at that time, Krishna spoke to him in the Bhagavad-gita. Another pause occurred when Yudhishthira stepped off his chariot, and everyone around him was pleased. They expected Yudhishthira to come for their blessings, as they knew him to be virtuous.

But along with asking for blessings, Yudhishthira also asked, “How can I defeat you?” Each of the warriors gave an enigmatic answer. Bhishma said, “The time for my defeat has not yet come. Come back later, and I will tell you.” Drona said, “I cannot be defeated when I hear disagreeable news from a trustworthy source. At that time, I will surrender, and then you will be able to defeat me.” Shalya said, “I came here to fight on your side, and I will support you in your cause, praying for your victory.”

So, on the evening of the ninth day of the war, Krishna reminded Arjuna of Bhishma’s words and encouraged him to go and ask Bhishma how he could be killed. Arjuna approached the task with a heavy heart, remembering his childhood with Bhishma. He recalled playing with Bhishma’s beard, sitting on his lap, and feeling the dust on his feet. “How can I defeat someone like that? How can I even ask him how I can kill him?” Arjuna said.

Krishna consoled him, saying, “The duty of a Kshatriya is a difficult one. You have made a vow, and despite the relationship of grandfather and grandchild, your duty is clear.” Krishna then reminded Arjuna of Bhishma’s vow as a warrior—to never attack a woman. He also vowed that if anyone came in front of him in battle, he would not shoot arrows at them.

This vow might seem strange to us. Why would Bhishma, a grandfather, tell others how to defeat him? Why would he reveal his weakness? The situation with Bhishma is unique. Though Krishna was celibate and followed the path of self-discipline, he still took on great responsibility for his family. Bhishma, although celibate, had to arrange marriages for his stepbrothers, including getting wives for them. This was not an easy task, especially when Chitrangada had been killed earlier and Chitraviryasa was weak. Bhishma was anxious about the success of the Kuru family line and arranged for the marriages of Amba, Ambika, and Ambalika to ensure their survival. He also had to fight for their honor in contests of arms.

She had given her heart to him and had planned to win the contest. Since Bhishma had taken a vow of celibacy, it was a secret arrangement, but when things didn’t go as she had hoped, she went to Bhishma and insisted that he marry her, blaming him for putting her in this predicament. Bhishma, however, explained that he had taken a vow of celibacy and could not marry. After trying everything she could, Amba eventually decided to perform austerities and entered the river, ending her life.

She vowed to return and seek revenge on Bhishma, as she blamed him for ruining her life. In this case, we can see that there are unfortunate situations and those caused intentionally. Some actions are atrocities, while others are simply adversities that happen to people.

Amba’s tragic situation can be seen as adversity. While she endured great suffering, Bhishma’s refusal to break his vow was not out of malice but rather out of duty, though he did unknowingly contribute to her suffering. Bhishma knew he had played a role in Amba’s misery, but he could not abandon his vows. His decision to not attack Shikhandi in the battle later on was his way of atoning for his past actions.

Now, regarding the ethics of the situation: Bhishma declared that if Shikhandi led the charge and Arjuna shot arrows from behind, he would not attack. This was not something Arjuna wanted, as he did not want to fight his grandfather and certainly didn’t want to win through such a tactic.

Is this ethical? It’s certainly not a fair fight, and Arjuna’s victory over Bhishma in this way could be seen as unethical. However, Arjuna was a skilled warrior capable of defeating Bhishma under normal circumstances, as shown in their earlier encounters.

The war began again the next day, and Arjuna, despite his hesitations, decided to take matters into his own hands. He allowed Shikhandi to lead the charge, and Arjuna, overcoming his inner conflict, finally attacked Bhishma. The battle between Arjuna and Bhishma was long and intense. Krishna, knowing the turmoil in Arjuna’s heart, understood what had to be done. There were many moments during the war when Arjuna became soft-hearted, but Krishna remained composed.

Krishna’s demeanor contrasts with Arjuna’s emotional turmoil. There’s a difference between being cool-headed and being cold-hearted. Being cool-headed means staying calm and rational, not being swayed by emotions. Krishna’s actions might seem cold, but they were necessary to guide Arjuna and ensure the right course of action in the war.

Krishna had to bring Arjuna back to reality. He told Arjuna that today was the day he had to act. Arjuna, hesitant, didn’t want to fight his grandfather, but Krishna reminded him that he had no choice. Bhishma, aware that he could not win against Arjuna, was already struggling.

Shikhandi, who had taken the lead in the charge, was a warrior, but no match for Arjuna. He shot arrows, but Bhishma didn’t dodge them, knowing his time had come. Krishna told Arjuna, “This is your opportunity.” Arjuna, still conflicted, realized that although this would be his victory, he wasn’t the one directly responsible for Bhishma’s downfall. Bhishma continued fighting other warriors on the battlefield, but the arrows kept coming, one after another, piercing his body.

Normally, a charioteer moves the chariot to avoid arrows, or warriors counter arrows to deflect them. But Bhishma didn’t do either. His chariot moved as best it could to dodge, but the arrows from Arjuna kept hitting him. Bhishma, who had never been defeated in his life, now endured countless arrows, yet he did not fall. Eventually, though, when Bhishma was on his chariot, he collapsed.

Duryodhana, seeing his grandfather fall, was overwhelmed with sorrow. He realized that his actions had led to this moment and that he was, in part, responsible for the fall of Bhishma. He ordered physicians to tend to Bhishma, but Bhishma, with his wisdom, rejected their help. Then, Arjuna, seeing his grandfather in pain, shot an arrow into the earth, which emerged and became the support for Bhishma’s head.

Bhishma, thirsty in his final moments, asked for water. Arjuna, always respectful despite the battle, prepared to fetch it for him. Even though Arjuna had caused Bhishma’s fall, his service attitude remained intact.

Duryodhana, devastated, approached Bhishma. With tears in his eyes, Bhishma said to him, “O prince, you have seen that I, who was never defeated, have now been defeated by the Pandavas. Let this be the proof of their victory. Let all hostilities end with my fall. Divide the kingdom equally, and live in peace.”

But Duryodhana, although moved, did not respond. He stayed silent, not willing to agree to Bhishma’s words. Bhishma gazed at him with hopeful eyes, but those hopes were never realized.

As the situation grew clear, it was evident that Bhishma would die soon. However, he chose not to die at that moment. He could have ended his life long ago, when Draupadi was dishonored, when the Pandavas were wronged, but he held on to life with the hope that virtue would ultimately prevail and that the Pandavas would be protected.

Bhishma had made a promise to his father to protect the kingdom, ensuring it would be in safe hands. He wanted to see Krishna’s plan unfold, believing that, in the end, righteousness would triumph. For both personal and spiritual reasons, he chose to stay alive to witness the fulfillment of that promise.

Krishna, witnessing Bhishma’s suffering and determination, blessed him. Despite all the arrows piercing his body, Krishna acknowledged Bhishma’s strength and resolve, and the warrior’s dedication to his vows.

Krishna blesses Bhishma, saying, “I bless you so that you will not feel any pain. You will rise above the consciousness of the body.” This blessing remains with him, day after day. Finally, after the war ends, Yudhishthira suffers even more as he processes the aftermath. Although all the Pandavas are Kshatriyas, Yudhishthira, burdened by guilt, feels it deeply.

There’s a saying in English, “The cost of war is so much that what you gain is far less than what you lose.” The Pandavas lose all their sons—Abhimanyu is the first to die, and soon after, all their other sons are killed. Just when it seems that victory is within reach, the cost of war becomes overwhelming.

Yudhishthira wonders, “What did I fight for?” Throughout the war, he had always believed that he was fighting for his brothers, yet now, after so much loss, he feels the weight of his actions. Kunti then reminds him, “You knew he was your brother. There were two occasions when Kunti could have killed you, but she didn’t.”

Yudhishthira feels utterly culpable, and his guilt consumes him. He tells Kunti, “I cannot be the king. A king must feel responsible for the lives of all his people, but I cannot carry that burden.”

When Yudhishthira finally goes to see Bhishma, Krishna’s instruction to him becomes clear. Bhishma, despite all the atrocities and adversities he endured, had always remained virtuous. Bhishma’s words reveal an important truth: Life in this world will often be unfair, but beyond that, the Lord has a plan that works out for the good of all.

In this way, suffering and its causes can sometimes be hard to understand. We often blame others, or worse, we blame ourselves. We feel like terrible people. But suffering has both a cause and a cure. Sometimes the cause is known, and sometimes the cure is clear. But at other times, both remain unknown. And the hardest thing for the human mind to accept is that we don’t always know the cause, or worse, we can’t fix it.

If we do know the cause and the cure, that is the ideal situation. We can identify the problem and its solution. But when we don’t know, we struggle to accept our ignorance. We want to find someone to blame, someone to hold responsible for the suffering.

The real cure, however, lies in Dharma. Dharma is the right course of action, doing our duty, and living in accordance with the higher principles. This is what leads us to the ultimate cure—Bhakti. In this particular pastime, Vishma’s insight into suffering shows that sometimes the cause of suffering is unknown, but this concept is echoed later in the discussion between Narada and Parikshit. Parikshit asks, “What is the cause of your suffering?” At first glance, this question seems absurd. Why? Because the answer lies in the deeper nature of oneself, which cannot always be easily explained.

You know, the question might seem absurd. Why? Because Parikshit saw the cow and bull being beaten, and yet the answer seems absurd at first. Why? Because different philosophers have different answers. Some say it’s karma. Others say it’s the ego. Some suggest that suffering arises because we are attached to the body—we are the soul, but we identify too strongly with the body.

Each of these ideas has some validity. Ultimately, when it comes to specific suffering, we can’t always point to a single, clear cause. Imagine if a guest comes to our house and says, “I feel very good here,” and we respond by saying, “No, that’s not what the world is about.” Some people might say the purpose of life is to remove the burden of the earth, while others may say we are here to destroy evil kings.

The final response, though, often comes from the speaker’s own perspective. Now, if you see the situation, you may ask: Is it really absurd? What is being said is this: “One who points out a wrongdoer receives the same punishment as the wrongdoer.”

How does that work? If someone wrongs a bank and you point out that the bank was robbed, does that mean both the robber and the person pointing out the crime are equally guilty? This seems absurd, but the deeper meaning is that when we fixate on a particular cause of our suffering—whether it’s blaming someone or something—we become trapped in the ignorance of the material world. In that sense, we are both caught in that same cycle of ignorance.

What Parikshit Maharaj is showing us here is that when we try to find the cause of suffering, if we focus on just one cause, we often get consumed by it. We might start hating the person or situation, and that only further entangles us in material attachments. This doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t take action. We must take action when necessary. But fixating on a specific cause and thinking that fixing it will solve all our problems can be counterproductive. Sometimes, we can’t find the cause at all.

For example, when a child is crying, we might comfort them, and the child may stop crying. But sometimes, despite our efforts, the child continues to cry. We may take the child to the doctor, who might prescribe medicine, but the crying doesn’t stop. In these situations, we often feel the need to find the cause, but our eagerness to do so can make us fixate on the wrong thing. This can lead to unnecessary stress and resentment toward someone or something.

In the case of Yudhishthira, for instance, he’s fixating on himself. He believes he is the cause of all the suffering, which weighs heavily on him. He feels responsible for everything, and this burden only deepens his guilt.

In medicine, there’s a category of diseases called “idiopathic diseases.” “Idiopathic” doesn’t refer to stupidity but to conditions for which the cause is unknown. Sometimes, no clear reason can be found. For example, arthritis might develop without an obvious cause.

It means that some conditions, like certain cancers, are considered idiopathic—meaning their cause is unknown. Sometimes, we just can’t pinpoint the cause. However, we can identify what is going on and find a way to treat it. In many ways, the worldview in Bhakti philosophy is that suffering in this world is like an idiopathic disease: we can’t always know the cause.

Our focus, then, should not be so much on determining the cause as it should be on finding the cure. What can we do about it? We might ask, “How can we find the cure without knowing the cause?” Sometimes, that’s exactly what we have to do.

I was talking to someone recently, and they shared an analogy. When firefighters respond to a blaze, the first thing they often want to know is what caused the fire. If an electrical device is involved, they need to understand that to prevent further incidents. But many times, the cause is unknown, and there’s no one to explain it. In these cases, the focus shifts to what can be done to handle the situation.

Sometimes, things do make sense—we can trace events and figure out the cause. But even when things don’t make sense, we must still do the sensible thing. That’s a consistent theme in our philosophy. This doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try to understand the cause so we can find a solution, but we shouldn’t fixate on it. Our focus should be on what actions we can take.

Vishma’s request to Yudhishthira is essentially this: don’t blame yourself for everything, because you can’t know what caused all of this. Even great sages have trouble understanding the full scope of events, but the key is to ask, “What can I do now?” The problem is here; it’s in front of you. You now have to take responsibility and fix it.

When bad things happen, it’s not part of Krishna’s plan, but Krishna can still ensure that His plan is fulfilled, even in the face of adversity. Everything happens within His divine plan. Vishma tells Yudhishthira that now it’s time for him to take responsibility for the kingdom.

He further explains that in Krishna’s plan, sometimes we may appear to be the villains. We may feel like villains, or the world may see us that way. But if we maintain a sincere desire to serve, Krishna will redeem us. Vishma reflects on his own life, saying that although he didn’t always do the right thing, his heart was always in the right place. He always tried to be devoted to the Lord, and the Lord understood his heart. Now, as he faces his final moments, he is reassured that the Lord’s plan is unfolding in his life.

He tells Yudhishthira that the same redemption is possible for him. Although you may feel like the villain now, remember that if you maintain a pure, dharma-conscious attitude—one focused on serving Krishna—the Lord will guide you. Our highest dharma is to serve Krishna, and that’s the ultimate consciousness we should aim for. This doesn’t mean we neglect our duties in the material world, but we should always strive to do the right thing in every situation, with the ultimate goal of serving the Lord.

If we maintain a service attitude, Krishna will lead us to a better place. So, when facing difficulties, when we feel overwhelmed and crushed by troubles, we have two choices: we can either blame someone else, saying, “This person is causing me all this trouble,” or we can blame ourselves, thinking, “I am causing all this trouble.”

In either case, we may end up beating ourselves up. But we shouldn’t focus on that. Throughout his life, Bhishma tried to serve Krishna. He faced challenges, and even when his ventures didn’t succeed, he continued to seek the path of service. Sometimes, life doesn’t make sense, and we can’t always understand the reasons behind our troubles.

The point is that we might never have full clarity on why things happen. Even when we try to figure it out, we may never know all the reasons. One aspect of humility is the acceptance of the unknowable—there are things that are not only unknown, but also unknowable to us. This is a teaching Krishna shares: there are things beyond our understanding. What we can know, however, is what we’re meant to do in any given situation.

When we focus on serving Krishna and ask, “What can I do to serve Krishna right now?” we align ourselves with a higher purpose. Even when circumstances appear challenging, we can demonstrate our devotion and duty. Krishna’s devotees are often tested, and at times, the world may not understand their actions. It may seem like they have chosen an unrighteous path, but from the perspective of devotion, they remain aligned with Krishna’s plan.

In Bhishma’s case, though his actions may have seemed questionable at times, his departure from the world was ultimately glorious. From both a material and spiritual perspective, his journey demonstrated the principles of dharma. His life and death were a testament to his love for Krishna, and also to Krishna’s love for him. This eternal relationship between the Lord and His devotee is what we all strive to enter into through our practice of devotion.

Ultimately, the lesson from Bhishma’s journey is about the vision of life—understanding that there will be moments when our actions seem unclear or even questionable. Krishna guided him, brought him to the understanding that there are times when atonement is necessary, but true atonement comes from humility and surrender to the divine will.

Bhishma accepted that he wouldn’t attack in certain circumstances, allowing his own death to come naturally. His actions showed the depth of his devotion and his understanding of dharma. He consoled Yudhishthira by explaining that the cause of suffering is often difficult to pinpoint. What matters is not the cause but how we respond to suffering and what we can do to alleviate it.

This understanding is crucial in our lives. Sometimes we cannot understand the cause of our suffering, but we can focus on what we can do about it. That is the essence of practicing devotion—focusing on what we can do to serve Krishna, even when the reasons behind our struggles remain unclear.

We often want to find the cause of our suffering, and in doing so, we may assume a false cause. Yudhishthira, for example, believes that his greed for the kingdom is the root of his suffering. He thinks the cure lies in renouncing the kingdom, thinking that if he were not so attached to power, his suffering would end. However, Krishna teaches that the cause is unknowable, but the cure is clear: it is to do your dharma. In this case, Yudhishthira’s dharma is to rule the kingdom, as it is the will of the Lord.

Krishna tells him that just as He himself has followed His dharma, Yudhishthira must fulfill his own. The key focus here is not on identifying the cause of suffering, which may be karma, but on the cure, which is to perform one’s dharma. Much of the suffering in the world, Krishna explains, may seem idiopathic—that is, we don’t always know the cause. Yet, instead of dwelling on the unknown cause, we should focus on how we can help and alleviate suffering.

This brings us to the ideal departure of Bhishma. The world is complex, and even when we pray for guidance, asking Krishna to help us make the right decisions, sometimes we still make mistakes. In such cases, the important thing is to keep our heart devoted to Krishna. As long as we remain sincere in our devotion, we can trust that Krishna will guide us to Him, regardless of the errors we may make along the way.

Sometimes we may know the cause of suffering but not the cure. In those moments, we simply have to tolerate the situation, accepting that we can’t do much to change it. If we do know the cause and the cure, we can take action accordingly. But when we don’t know the cause, we act with our best intelligence: focusing on what we can do in the present situation, regardless of whether we understand the cause.

For instance, if firefighters know the cause of a fire, they can address it more effectively. But if they don’t know the cause, they still need to act to put out the fire. Similarly, in life, even when we can’t identify the specific cause of our troubles, we still need to respond to the situation with our best efforts.

This approach is important because seeking a specific cause and cure can sometimes paralyze us. It is only when we fixate on a particular cause and cure that we may feel helpless, as if nothing can be done. But if we let go of the need for precise answers, we can move forward in a way that addresses the issue at hand.

At times, this requires a mindset of acceptance. For example, if we find ourselves in a difficult situation, we can choose to believe that there is a higher purpose behind it, even if we can’t see it. Krishna may have a plan for us, and we can trust that everything happens for a reason.

In summary, while we may seek causes and cures, the ultimate lesson is about how we act in the present moment. If we focus on doing what we can to serve Krishna and fulfill our dharma, we can navigate through suffering with grace.

This is demonstrated in the Mahabharata and the Bhagavad Gita, where even in the face of hardship, we see the importance of doing our duty and keeping faith in the divine plan.

By simply staying on guard and not trying to counterattack, Gurudev would eventually calm down. Unfortunately, Gurudev’s actions only escalated thereafter. The consciousness with which we accept situations is crucial. However, even in these moments, we must strive to understand and manage our emotions.

Now, when we look at the example of Yudhishthira, we can see that his strength was not just in his physical abilities but in his unwavering faith in Krishna. For instance, Draupadi’s unwavering faith in Krishna, even when she was subjected to the greatest dishonor, remains a perennial source of inspiration. Even after Krishna showed his universal form and thwarted Duryodhana’s plans, Duryodhana continued to maintain his false belief, thinking that Krishna’s divine form was merely a magic trick.

Similarly, when the Pandavas suffered great losses, especially on the first day of the war, it was Krishna’s words of wisdom that helped them regain balance. His words were crucial in restoring Yudhishthira’s sense of direction and hope.

When Yudhishthira learned of Abhimanyu’s death, his heart was overwhelmed with turmoil. He contemplated taking revenge on the Kauravas or dying in battle himself. But Krishna, through his wisdom, calmed him and assured him of the right course of action. Krishna told Yudhishthira to be patient, that the time would come when he could avenge Abhimanyu’s death, but for now, he should stay focused on his duties.

After the war, when Yudhishthira expressed his desire for renunciation, the others were bewildered. It seemed strange to them, especially after all they had gone through. Yudhishthira’s struggles were not just against external forces, but also against his inner dilemmas, between competing dharmas. This inner conflict led to moments of indecision. This is an important aspect of dharma: it’s not always clear-cut, and sometimes, as seen with Yudhishthira, one must face choices that pull them in different directions.

When Duryodhana was unable to succeed in his various schemes to bring suffering to the Pandavas, he became increasingly condescending. He dismissed the advice of the sages and insulted them, which ultimately led to his downfall. The suffering of the Pandavas was transient, and though it was heart-wrenching, it served as a reminder that even the greatest suffering can be a test of one’s devotion and resolve.

It is a lesson for all of us: life is filled with complex challenges, but ultimately, it is how we react and stay committed to our dharma that determines our spiritual progress.

The key takeaway here is that Krishna’s teachings are not just for any one person; they are universal. Krishna would guide anyone who came to him with a sincere heart. And while we may speculate on how Krishna would guide different characters, the ultimate lesson is always to follow dharma, regardless of the circumstances.

In the case of Arjuna, he made some tough decisions, including choosing to act in a way that was not his original dharma. But as time went on, he understood the importance of staying true to his own path, and through Krishna’s guidance, he was able to realize his true potential.

Life may bring us unfair situations, but Krishna teaches us to accept what is meant to be and move forward with faith. If we can truly accept that certain things are not meant to be, then we can focus on what is within our control and act with wisdom. We must always keep in mind that the taste of success or joy may feel like nectar at first but can turn to poison later. However, Krishna guides us to find the true path, even when circumstances seem overwhelming.

The greatest victory is not in avoiding the struggles of life but in handling them with the right consciousness, the right understanding, and devotion. Like Arjuna, who faced unimaginable challenges, we too must trust that Krishna’s guidance will lead us through even the most difficult times.

So, in this moment, you are the wife of a hero—Arjuna’s wife—and you are asked to be the wife of a hero like Arjuna. What Shakuni did during the war involved using cunning tricks, but Krishna actually outwitted Shakuni in every way. Shakuni carried out his schemes before and during the war, but ultimately, it was Krishna’s guidance that prevailed over Shakuni’s deceit.

There’s a beautiful statement by Lord Krishna in the Bhagavad Gita, where he says, “I cannot be found in the Vedas, nor in any other texts. I am not here, nor there, but I am present where my devotees are gathered, discussing and chanting my name.” This highlights how Krishna is present wherever his devotees come together in devotion and conversation.

By the way, I didn’t plan to bring this up. I simply stood up and the thought occurred to me. It’s interesting how Krishna’s message often comes to us when we least expect it.

There’s also a book by Prabhuji that elaborates on the 700 verses of the Bhagavad Gita, connecting each verse to others in the scripture. He explains how each verse relates to others and how the verses support each other. In some cases, the verses are explained using contextual stories from the Mahabharata and the Ramayana, which serve to both negate and include deeper meanings. This process of negation and inclusion helps us understand the broader context of the teachings.

In a session with 100 people, a question is asked, starting with the first person and continuing around the group. Each person contributes their perspective, and eventually, the first person is asked to respond again. This discussion is a way to unravel deeper meanings and answers that may not be immediately clear.

During the war in Mahabharata, there were many instances when warriors got injured and had to be carried out. One might say they were defeated, but they often returned to rejoin the battle. This continuous struggle symbolizes the ongoing effort and perseverance of warriors. Arjuna, after spending time in the forest performing austerities, gained various divine weapons. These preparations helped him when the war resumed, and he was able to face his challenges more effectively.

In the context of the war, weapons were used to gain an upper hand. For example, there were moments when warriors had specific strategies to defeat their opponents. When one side faced a new weapon or strategy, they had to adapt to it quickly. This constant adaptation and learning were key to survival in the battle.

As for Bheeshma, he knew what had to be done in certain situations. His sense of duty and his vow sometimes led him to make difficult decisions, even when the consequences were clear. His commitment to dharma was strong, but it did not always lead him to the ideal solution. In some ways, he was like someone caught in a situation where the right path was clear, but circumstances made it difficult to act as expected.

There’s a parallel between Bheeshma’s situation and the challenges faced by others who know what should be done but are constrained by duty, vows, or circumstances. In both cases, the ideal solution seems clear, but the path to it is fraught with challenges and sometimes tragic consequences.

This scenario of knowing what needs to be done but not being able to fully implement it speaks to the complexity of life and dharma. The struggle lies in reconciling what we know to be right with the actions we must take, and often, the process involves self-sacrifice and a deep commitment to duty.

Right? You know, it’s happening right now. We’re not able to do anything, and we question Bheeshma, asking why he didn’t do anything.

I think this is a metaphor that I’ve heard used many times in our moments as well. Something’s going on somewhere, and there’s a senior devotee there who doesn’t really take action. People wonder why they’re not doing anything, asking why they are like Vishnu while X, Y, and Z are acting. It’s possible that in this case, the metaphor doesn’t perfectly apply, but it’s not a straightforward comparison either because Bheeshma had a particular role.

For Bheeshma, it wasn’t weakness so much as a deep commitment to his fixed focus on dharma. His focus on one aspect of dharma led him to make decisions that might seem perplexing, but it was a matter of prioritizing his vows. Ultimately, these are great characters we’re talking about. When we analyze them, we should focus not so much on who was right but on what was right in their circumstances. We may not fully understand every judgment they made, but we can learn from how they responded to challenges.

After the pandemic, two significant things have happened. One is that there’s a growing recognition of the importance of images and narratives in shaping how we view history.

Another shift is that, as we adapt to these changes, it has become more important to see how historical wrongs were dealt with and how we’ve evolved in response. In the past, due to India’s violent partition and religious tensions, the government tried to sanitize history by avoiding incidents that could rekindle divisions. They tended to whitewash attacks or overlook contentious moments.

However, now, there are many writers and historians addressing these issues and bringing them into the open. Yes, we did lose battles and wars in the past, and some were devastating losses, but those losses have prepared us for the bigger battles ahead. In many ways, the formation of advocacy groups and increased awareness of historical bonds is a positive shift.

The question always arises: should we learn history to understand what happened, or should we learn it to prevent disruptions in the present? The problem with the second approach is that it can become biased, serving the interests of a particular group or agenda. Most of us have stayed away from politics, but the situation is changing now. These two shifts are significant, but overall, there’s a greater awakening to these issues, and that’s a positive development.

They’ll be held accountable, or at least the atrocities will stop. Sometimes when you enter a big system, you agree to turn a blind eye to certain things, or you simply ignore them.

Take Mahabharata, for example: that one incident shows the different shades of various characters. If that one event were removed from the Mahabharata, everyone would seem flawless, doing the right thing. It would be easy to glorify the characters, but that one evening, or morning—I’m not sure—completely changed the perception of almost every character, including the Pandavas, Bhima, Arjuna, Nakula, Sahadeva, Yudhishthira, Karna, Shakuni, Duryodhana, Dushasana, Vidura, and others. The question arises: is this becoming an excuse? Could we use it as an excuse tomorrow and say, “It could happen to me too”?

So, what lesson should we learn from the changing shades of these characters’ actions? Ultimately, our scriptures show that even vulnerable characters have made questionable decisions. But do we interpret these actions as lessons to follow? That’s the question.

Take Bheeshma, for example. Is Bheeshma’s silence the lesson we should learn from? Should we be silent, not just about external situations, but in our own lives as well? If we act like that, we might miss out on the deeper messages of the tradition.

My understanding is that sometimes, when wrong things are happening and some seniors stay silent, we might feel disappointed by their silence. But we must remember that they may have their reasons for acting the way they do. For us, as smaller individuals, it’s important to realize that we may not have the full picture.

That’s why we shouldn’t use their silence as an excuse to justify our own actions. Certainly, it’s not right to say, “Something bad is happening, but I can’t do anything about it,” as an excuse to remain passive. Sometimes, we may not have the power to change a situation, but that doesn’t mean we do nothing. We need to play the long game. Even when we see something wrong, we may not have the power to fix it right away. But by growing through service and sharing, we can eventually make a difference.

We grow in understanding and in position. Maybe later on, we’ll have the ability to fix some things. There are always bad things in the world, and it’s often difficult when these bad things are allowed by good people—or even done by good people. It’s a tough situation.

We could use this as a matter of meaning, I would say. When you’re reflecting on Arjuna, such a strong character, seeing his wife being dishonored, and witnessing his most respected grandfather right there, not acting, it’s hard to comprehend. Yet, despite everything, Arjuna still carried love and affection for his grandfather on the battlefield, as you mentioned earlier. The concept of honoring one’s word is something that’s difficult for many of us to truly grasp.

Does that mean that even Yudhishthira and the Pandavas should have stayed silent when Draupadi was being dishonored? Are they bound by their word? We could ask that question too. It seems that the actions of the characters in the Mahabharata, especially in this situation, are almost incomprehensible to us. In fact, it’s a bizarre situation where almost everyone’s actions seem hard to understand.

Sometimes, finding the cause of something can be a significant part of our service, and we try to do that. How far we go depends on two factors: our position and our disposition.

For example, if someone’s job is to do research, then they should continue that work in their position. In one sense, humanity’s search for knowledge doesn’t have to be abandoned. However, we need to maintain perspective: how much is this search costing us, and is the cost worth it? Like I mentioned earlier, can we learn from the past, or are we replaying it so much that we’re stuck in it, unable to move on? That’s a difficult thing to navigate.

I don’t think there’s a single answer to this. But for some people, if this search is their service, they should continue doing it. That’s their job, their service.

And for others, there’s this need to understand the forces that altered the course of world history. If Shakuni hadn’t been so influential, the Kauravas might have even gone on to rule the world. She’s the main reason everything the Kauravas wanted didn’t come to fruition.

Bhima took the blood off, and Draupadi had washed her hair. She never tied her hair again after that incident. The horrible event that happened might be true, but even then, the loss of her honor and the disappointment she must have felt were hard to bear. Of course, it was a difficult time, both for her as well as for those around her. Bhima took action, and in many ways, the whole expectation and outcome of that test seemed to alter their perspectives. This event changed their vision and the way they saw the world.

In a way, accepting that there is a bigger reality outside of this world is part of the process. This world is real, but there is a greater reality beyond it. The story of life does not end here, and sometimes justice does not manifest in this life. When bad things happen, it’s very difficult to understand and compare them to anything else.

As far as Draupadi goes, from what I’ve read and discussed with others, there were moments when she was angry. But it’s not that her relationship with the Pandavas was permanently broken. That didn’t happen. In fact, Yudhishthira, who took part in the gambling, tried to play by the rules set by those who compelled him to participate in the game. He stayed with his brothers during that time. Later, in the forest, he was under even greater pressure to refuse the offer, but he continued the gamble.

His mindset was that he thought his cause was right. Even when he lost, he believed the next bet would go his way. He had this sense of determination, thinking that his efforts were justified. Yet, at some point, the reality of the situation began to settle in. Despite his efforts, things weren’t turning out as planned, and he had to adapt.

He later sent a message to Sanjay, offering his best wishes and acknowledging that everything in life is temporary. Rationalizing what happened, he accepted the agreement that was made, and in doing so, he learned the hard way.

So, did justice happen for Draupadi? Not really. But was it unfair? Adversity comes to everyone, no matter who we are, how good we are, or how powerful we are. The important thing is that adversity is a part of life.

I’ll speak to this in one aspect: How many people have the opportunity to ask such questions and even get answers? Just think about it. I’ve spent 48 years of my life, and how many people have the audacity and confidence to ask these questions and seek answers?

And the answers come at different levels. The key is to increase our faith that Krishna is always there. That’s the whole point.

So Ravi is here for the next 9 days in Optus. I’m not sure about the exact schedule, but he’ll be here for more than just the next few days. Sometimes, Mahabharata is seen as a story, like a fictional tale, but that’s a different way of looking at it. Ravi will be explaining it in the coming days, starting Monday morning, then continuing on Tuesday, Wednesday, Friday, and next Monday, as well as Sunday, February 2nd. He’s going to continue sharing these marvelous teachings.

Don’t think that your questions haven’t been answered yet because Ravi will discuss what Arjuna went through in the coming week. This week is specially designed for each of us who are here, gathered in this moment. Somehow, in this lifetime, we have all come together, virtually, to hear these answers.

And I would personally encourage you to ask your questions, question by question. Let’s strive to get the answers we need. Let’s be eager for those answers and focus only on the questions that really matter to our lives. Even the great saints sometimes cannot answer every question. I’ve learned this from ancient teachings — sometimes, a guru will just look at the questioner and move on, because the question isn’t something that will change their life.

So, why don’t we jot down our questions for the next 6 or 7 days? Let’s make sure they’re questions that will help us become more dedicated, more surrendered, and better aligned with the divine mission. Let’s focus on questions that will make a real difference in our lives. We should come back with that mindset tomorrow and in the days ahead. And let’s thank Prabhuji for his insightful answers and his enthusiasm to continue sharing these teachings with us.

Thank you all. Let’s express our gratitude. And here is an amazing, beautifully written book. Many of you may already have it, but if not, you can take one and even gift it to your friends. I’ve gifted it to my boss, and he really liked it. It’s a beautifully designed book, printed by HarperCollins, and it’s professionally done with a great font and layout. It’s a fantastic gift for anyone’s birthday.

Right? So why don’t you get it signed? When I gave it to my boss — actually, my customer — I showed him the book and also had his name written by Prabhuji. I told him, “Why don’t you come?” He was supposed to come here to Liberty.

Thank you, Madhuri and Drowsy. Also, there’s a request: today, there is a plan for Jelanath and Goranath. While the Aarti is being offered, you can make a quick line.

You can form a quick line, with 5 people at a time. Go one by one. It won’t take much time. Just take the Ashman there, and you can come up like this to do your part.

The rest of you can come up and take your book for signing afterward.

Adi Krishna, hello! Would you like to say a few words?

Thank you, Krishna. And thank you to everyone joining online. We’ll continue tomorrow. Please join us for the remaining sessions. We have 6 more sessions on Mahabharata and its characters.

The post Part 2: Those 18 Days @ Mahabharat – HG Chaitanya Charan Prabhuji @ Bhakti Center Gachibowli appeared first on The Spiritual Scientist.

Part 1: Those 18 Days @ Mahabharat – HG Chaitanya Charan Prabhuji @ Bhakti Center Gachibowli
→ The Spiritual Scientist

So, just to confirm, will this also be showing? Is it possible? No, this is recording, right? No? Okay, I’ll be live streaming with this one.

Can any positional function be seen, or will that be difficult? It seems difficult, right? In between, I think he’ll manage it. He’ll take care of it. It might be challenging for you to keep adjusting it, but maybe you can just keep it over there on the stand. Oh, the sound isn’t connected?

Okay, fine. No problem. The sound is not connected, right? Alright, that’s okay.

So, Levan Prabhu is saying that I am unique. Yes, I do so little, and yet I have such a big ego—definitely unique! He was telling me yesterday about 2016 when we built a whole community here. I think in 2016… or was it 2024? I just kept doing the same things I did before.

It was good—traveling, giving classes, and unintentionally causing inconvenience to people wherever I went! Yesterday, most of those changes came to mind. I told him, “I’m very comfortable making others uncomfortable!” So, I’m grateful to be here.

In some ways, if we study human history, we see patterns of mass karma—both negative and positive. Mass negative karma often leads to natural disasters. But similarly, there are places and times where we see mass positive karma manifesting.

For example, if you look at history, there are times when many scientists appear in the same place at the same time—whether due to geography or historical circumstances. During the Enlightenment, many scientists emerged in Europe. Similarly, a lot of authors appeared during particular literary movements. Take India’s Bengal Renaissance, for instance—so many brilliant thinkers, writers, and patriots emerged during that time.

The same thing happens with spiritual movements when they grow. For example, when Srila Prabhupada went to America, he started on the lower east side—probably the least likely place for a spiritual revolution. Many of the people there were associated with drugs, not necessarily as addicts but using drugs as a means for spiritual exploration. And yet, a number of those individuals turned out to be deeply spiritually inclined.

Then they met Srila Prabhupada and became extremely dedicated. It’s undoubtedly Prabhupada’s glory, but it’s also the glory of those who wholeheartedly dedicated themselves to him. A number of people came together at particular times, creating moments of great momentum.

Am I audible clearly? Yes? Alright.

When I reflect on the history of our movement, it seems that between 1995 and around 2010—maybe even up to 2015—there were places where many young, educated individuals became inspired. These were areas where we actively taught, and a significant number of these individuals eventually chose the brahmachari ashram. Prior to this period, this wasn’t as common, and after that time, it seems to have tapered off. While it still happens, it’s not to the same extent as before.

What’s remarkable now, especially from around 2017 onward—2020, perhaps—is that we see a different trend. There are now places where many dedicated gṛhastha devotees are emerging. For example, I recently visited Gurgaon, and it feels like a thriving center of spiritual energy. Similarly, in Bangalore, particularly in Whitefield, there’s a growing, vibrant community.

Perhaps due to past karma, during earlier times, certain souls with spiritual inclinations became engineers and later chose the brahmachari ashram. Now, it seems that souls with spiritual karma are gravitating toward the gṛhastha ashram and offering significant contributions. Even in core temples with fewer devotees attending morning classes, it’s laudable to see communities like yours flourishing.

Not only are you attending morning classes consistently, but you’re also organizing so many yātrās in different localities. That, in itself, is extraordinary. I think this community has been flying under the radar for quite some time, but now the days of staying unnoticed are ending. This is a truly remarkable group.

When I arrived here, I noticed many of you were already present, even before the program began. That’s a sign of extraordinary dedication, discipline, or perhaps deep interest—whatever you’d like to call it. Often, there’s a mutual negative feedback loop: the audience assumes the speaker will come late, and the speaker assumes the audience will trickle in late. But seeing all of you here so early is inspiring.

I recall once teaching at East of Kailash. After the program, I stayed back and had a conversation with Maharaj. It lasted over an hour and a half! Later, I had another program to attend in a different locality, which was about an hour and a half away. I was anxious about being late, especially because we hadn’t even started the śloka recitation yet. However, the host remained remarkably calm, even as we got delayed. It was a lesson for me in patience and composure.

Looking ahead to tomorrow, we’ll dive into the 18-day Kurukshetra war, which will be our primary topic of discussion. The Mahabharata is one of the most dramatic epics in our tradition, and everything within it builds toward those climactic 18 days.

I remember conducting a youth retreat at IIT Kharagpur during the pandemic. It was a memorable experience, as it was the first time many of those young participants had engaged in anything like that. We spent nearly 11–12 hours continuously discussing these profound topics.

Are you saying 11–12 hours continuously? Oh, you’re from Kharagpur?

Oh, is that so? I’m also originally from Kharagpur.

Oh, understood. That’s interesting.

Recently, someone I met mentioned being from IIT Kharagpur and now working in Silicon Valley. He told me, “I long for those classes.” I asked him, “Why?” That led to a conversation about how we can explore the Mahabharata from multiple frameworks.

The Mahabharata is such a vast and rich text that it offers us many perspectives to study and learn from:

  1. Life Lessons:
    We can examine the characters’ actions, the choices they made, and the consequences of those choices. By doing so, we extract valuable lessons for our own lives. This is one of the most common approaches to studying the Mahabharata.
  2. Resolving Controversies:
    The Mahabharata contains numerous actions and events that might seem controversial or contradictory at first glance. For example, some decisions or behaviors appear morally ambiguous. We can analyze these controversies to understand their context and reasoning more deeply.
  3. Bhakti Rasa (Divine Emotions):
    The Mahabharata is also a spiritual masterpiece, where we see how Krishna protects his devotees and how his devotees respond with devotion. From this perspective, the focus is on the rasa—the divine emotions evoked by Krishna’s pastimes and the actions of his devotees.

In our discussions, we’ll focus primarily on resolving controversies, but we’ll also touch on life lessons and bhakti rasa.

Understanding Controversies in the Mahabharata

When we talk about controversies, I’ve found that they usually arise from three main sources:

  1. Cultural Differences:
    The culture of the Mahabharata’s era was vastly different from ours. When we look at those actions through the lens of modern culture, we sometimes fail to understand them. Even across geographical boundaries today, cultural practices can seem alien. For instance, after an aarti ceremony, an Australian lady once asked me, “Why do people kiss the floor when the conch is blown?” What she referred to as “kissing the floor” was actually devotees offering obeisances, something deeply rooted in our tradition.
  2. Complexity of Situations:
    Many scenarios in the Mahabharata were inherently complex. Determining the right course of action was challenging even for the characters involved. Decisions often involved weighing multiple factors, and the true consequences became apparent only over time. This complexity makes it difficult to pass immediate judgments on whether a particular action was right or wrong.
  3. Human Nature and Moral Dilemmas:
    Sometimes, the controversies arise not just from cultural or situational complexity but from human emotions and moral dilemmas. The characters were placed in situations where any decision would come with consequences.

As we study the Mahabharata, we’ll strive to understand the cultural context, unpack the complexity of situations, and explore the deeper moral and spiritual lessons.

Our focus will primarily be on understanding the controversies, but we’ll also delve into the life lessons and the devotional aspects of the text. By doing so, we hope to uncover the wisdom that the Mahabharata offers, which remains timeless and deeply relevant.

It wasn’t necessarily a wrong choice, but the finiteness of the human condition means that sometimes we make choices that later appear to be wrong. This is simply a reality of life.

The third aspect, of course, is concoction. Concoction refers to how, over time, these epics have been retold with varying degrees of alteration. These alterations often reflect the interests or agendas of the storytellers. Some of these shifts can be subtle, while others may drastically reframe the narrative to serve a specific purpose.

For example, take the Jaina Ramayana. It follows the same broad storyline as the traditional Ramayana but with one major difference: during his time in the forest, Lord Ram is depicted as meeting Jain monks, learning from them, and eventually becoming enlightened as a Jain. In this retelling, Sita’s entry into the earth is portrayed as the moment Ram attains enlightenment and becomes a Jain monk himself. Clearly, this version was crafted with a specific agenda to align the epic with Jain philosophy.

Such concoctions have occurred throughout history as storytellers have reimagined and adapted these epics to fit their own ideologies, cultural contexts, or philosophical goals.

On the other hand, complexity lies in the original situations depicted in these epics. Many events and actions are inherently complex, and understanding why certain issues became controversial requires a nuanced analysis of the characters and their circumstances.

As we focus on the 18 days of the war, we will also take occasional flashbacks to explore the earlier lives of key characters. By doing so, we can better understand how their choices and actions led them to the situations they faced on the battlefield.

Adjusting the Plan for the Discussion

Regarding our discussion of the Mahabharata, the way I’ve planned it is this: each day, we’ll focus on one prominent character and their role during the war. We’ll go over the events of the 18 days, but instead of providing a day-by-day account, I’ll highlight key characters and their actions, with special attention to the complexity of their decisions.

For instance, today, we’ll focus on the 8th, 9th, and 10th days of the war, particularly exploring the character of Bhishma. We’ll discuss what he did, why he did it, and the deeper implications of his actions.

On a lighter note, if you ever have trouble hearing me or there’s any issue with sound, please let me know. I noticed some breathing sounds earlier, which might have caused a slight disturbance, but it seems to have settled now.

For those who can’t hear clearly—unless you prefer not to hear me at all—do speak up! (laughs)

Lastly, I’m reminded of a conversation I had with a friend who was planning outreach in the West. He presented an elaborate, strategic plan and sought blessings from a Maharaj. The Maharaj, in response, said something profound:

“I have no doubt that you will be successful.
And I have no doubt that your plan will be unsuccessful.”

This highlights the balance between human effort and divine will. We make plans to show Krishna that we are serious about our endeavors, but we must also remain flexible and accept that Krishna has his own plan for us.

With that spirit, let’s see how our exploration of the Mahabharata unfolds over the next few days!

On the 11th, 12th, 13th, and 14th days, we’ll focus on Abhimanyu and Arjuna. In this section, we’ll also discuss Krishna’s protection and other related themes.

On the 15th day, we’ll shift our focus to Drona. This will be the main topic of discussion on our third session, corresponding to the 15th day of the war. We’ll analyze multiple aspects of Drona’s actions, both during the war and at other critical moments in his life.

Then, on the 16th and 17th days, we’ll explore the character of Karna, one of the most controversial figures in the Mahabharata. There is much to learn from Karna’s choices, challenges, and the ethical dilemmas surrounding him, so we’ll dedicate significant time to understanding his role and legacy.

Finally, on the 18th day, we’ll discuss Duryodhana, and then cover the 18th night, focusing on Ashwatthama and the aftermath of the war.

So, over these six sessions, we’ll aim to cover the 18 days of the war by highlighting these key characters and their contributions to the Mahabharata.

Overview of Today’s Session

Before diving into Bhishma and his role in the war, I’ll provide some background about the events leading up to the war and how the battle unfolded. However, I’ll try to keep the background concise so we can focus on Bhishma’s character and contributions.

What’s the time now? 8:30? Alright. I’ll aim to wrap up by 9:30 sharp as per the schedule. Let’s see how it goes.

The Nature of War in the Mahabharata

At that time, war in many ways resembled sports. You might wonder—why compare war to sports? Well, consider the analogy of cricket, especially an India-Pakistan match, often described as “a war without bullets.” Similarly, the Mahabharata war had some structured elements that were almost “sport-like” in nature:

  • Fixed venue: The war was fought in a designated location—Kurukshetra—rather than spilling over into civilian areas. This ensured that civilians were not punished or harmed during the war.
  • Fixed time: The battles started in the morning and ended by evening, following a strict schedule.

These structured elements reflect a code of ethics that governed the war.

Additionally, war was viewed as a test—a test of strength, skills, and strategy. By skills, I don’t just mean physical prowess. Skills also encompassed intellectual and strategic abilities. For example, just like cricket requires a mix of physical skills (batting, bowling) and tactics (field placement, choosing the right bowlers at critical moments), warriors in the Mahabharata used both strength and strategy to outwit their opponents.

Tactics, or what we might call smarts or strategy, played a critical role. Think of a spin bowler in cricket—their effectiveness doesn’t lie just in brute strength but in their ability to outthink the batter. Similarly, the Mahabharata war involved a blend of strength, skills, and tactical brilliance.

The idea was similar to cricket strategies—if a batsman has a weakness against balls pitched on the outside off-stump, bowlers will strategically target that area. In war, similarly, it was a test of skills and strategy, where each side would try to outwit the other within the boundaries of fair play.

Now, the distinction between a clever tactic and outright cheating can sometimes get blurred, and we will delve into these nuances as we progress.

Prelude to the War

Before the war began, multiple rounds of negotiations were held to avoid conflict, but none of them succeeded. We’ll discuss these negotiations later, especially Krishna’s prominent role in them. Eventually, when all options for peace failed, the war became inevitable.

As the battle was about to commence, it was decided that Bhishma would be the commander of the Kaurava army. Bhishma was the senior-most and most respected warrior on their side. While others, such as Drona, were also highly skilled, Drona lacked Bhishma’s extensive battlefield experience. Drona was primarily a teacher who had trained the Kuru princes, and while he was an excellent warrior, he had not fought as many wars as Bhishma had. Bhishma, with his vast experience and unshakable reputation, was the natural choice to lead the Kaurava forces.

On the Pandava side, an interesting decision was made regarding their commander. Instead of appointing Arjuna, who was by far the greatest archer and the most skilled warrior, they chose Dhrishtadyumna to lead their forces. This decision had two main reasons:

  1. Arjuna’s Focus: Yudhishthira and Krishna wanted Arjuna to be free from the burden of overarching war strategies so that he could focus entirely on fighting. This is similar to how, in cricket, a star batsman’s performance might decline if they are also burdened with the responsibilities of captaincy. By keeping Arjuna focused solely on combat, they ensured he could perform at his best.
  2. Psychological Impact: Dhrishtadyumna had been born with a divine purpose—to kill Drona, the Kaurava general. Appointing him as commander sent a strong psychological message to the Kauravas: this war was serious, and the Pandavas were determined to fight.

While Bhima was a formidable warrior who could instill fear in the enemy, his temperament and impulsiveness made him unsuitable for the role of commander. Thus, Dhrishtadyumna, despite being relatively lesser-known compared to Arjuna or Bhima, was chosen to lead the Pandava forces.

The Kaurava Miscalculation

On the Kaurava side, there was significant overconfidence. Duryodhana believed that his superior army, combined with Bhishma and Drona’s skills, would guarantee victory. Moreover, he assumed that the Pandavas, out of their deep respect for Bhishma and Drona, might hesitate to fight. He thought they lacked the resolve to go to war against their elders.

However, by appointing Dhrishtadyumna as their commander, the Pandavas sent a clear message: this war was for real. Their decision demonstrated their determination to fight, regardless of who stood on the opposite side. This move shattered any remaining illusions Duryodhana may have had about the Pandavas backing down.

The Pandavas made a bold statement by appointing Dhrishtadyumna, the person born to kill Drona, as their commander. This decision had a symbolic significance and showed their determination to face even the mightiest warriors on the Kaurava side. However, even with their preparations, doubts lingered—especially for Arjuna, as evident from the Bhagavad-gita, which addressed his hesitation at the outset of the war.

The Ups and Downs of the War

The Kurukshetra War, like a test match in cricket, unfolded over an extended period, with many twists and turns. Test matches, unlike other sports, can last five days, and momentum can swing from one side to the other within a single session. Similarly, in war, fortunes shifted constantly.

On the first day, the Pandavas faced a devastating setback. Bhishma, the commander of the Kaurava forces, decimated the Pandava army. Despite Arjuna’s repeated vows to confront Bhishma, when the moment came, he found himself unable to engage in battle with him wholeheartedly.

This hesitation can be compared to cricket match-ups, where key players from opposing sides are pitted against each other—like a top spin bowler against a star batsman. In the Kurukshetra War, one of the central matchups was between Arjuna and Bhishma, which was expected to be the defining confrontation. However, Arjuna, despite Krishna’s counsel in the Bhagavad-gita and his own promises to fight, struggled to summon the resolve to face Bhishma on the battlefield.

Bhishma, on the other hand, fought with unparalleled vigor, causing immense destruction to the Pandava forces. This led to a day so disastrous that Arjuna began questioning the very decision to go to war. He even wondered whether fighting this war was a mistake. Krishna had to console him and remind him that the war was not a choice they had made lightly—it was forced upon them.

Faith and Uncertainty

This moment illustrates an important characteristic of faith. Often, we associate faith with certainty—the feeling that if we have faith, we’ll always be confident about the right course of action. While there’s truth to this, faith can also coexist with uncertainty.

Certainty means trusting that Krishna will protect us, but life’s complexities, especially when making difficult decisions, can lead to moments of doubt. Arjuna’s hesitation, even after Krishna’s guidance, shows the tension between faith and the emotional burden of confronting loved ones on the battlefield.

In such situations, noble and sensitive individuals, who care deeply for others’ emotions, often hesitate before engaging in conflict. On the other hand, those who are indifferent or insensitive may rush into confrontation without considering its consequences. But for people like Arjuna, who embody nobility and compassion, there are times when fighting becomes unavoidable despite their inner struggles.

The Inner Conflict of Faith and Duty

Even though the Pandavas were committed to fighting, their hearts were not entirely at peace. They knew that Duryodhana’s attempt to arrest Krishna during peace negotiations had made war inevitable. Yet, uncertainty lingered—not about their decision, but about the emotional toll it would take.

These were people they had loved and respected, and going to battle against them was deeply painful. This hesitation wasn’t a sign of weakness; rather, it reflected their humanity. Sometimes, life presents us with choices where none are truly good. Each option leads to pain—either for ourselves or for others. In such moments, the ability to move forward, despite uncertainty, requires extraordinary strength.

Early Days of the War

The second day of the war saw a shift in momentum. After witnessing Arjuna’s reluctance to fight, Bhima took charge and fought fiercely, rallying the Pandava forces. The third day was relatively balanced, with no significant victories on either side.

On the fourth day, Bhima unleashed his fury and decimated an entire elephant division of the Kauravas. This culminated in a personal confrontation between Bhima and Duryodhana, where Bhima battered him severely. Duryodhana was not only humiliated by Bhima but also by Bhima’s son, Ghatotkacha, who defeated him in battle. That night, Duryodhana was consumed by doubt and frustration.

In his despair, he approached Bhishma, accusing him of not fighting wholeheartedly. Duryodhana, a master politician, used harsh words to provoke Bhishma:

“If, out of affection for the Pandavas, you cannot fight with your full strength, then step down and let Karna take your place as commander. Karna has promised to destroy the Pandavas and their army.”

Bhishma, deeply insulted, responded:

“Prince, you are ever ungrateful to those who work tirelessly for your cause. My body is bloodied with wounds sustained while fighting for you. What more do you expect me to do that your beloved Karna could achieve?”

Despite his anger, Bhishma vowed:

“Tomorrow, I will kill the Pandavas with these five arrows.”

Using his celibacy and immense spiritual powers, Bhishma infused divine energy into five arrows, dedicating them to the destruction of the Pandavas.

Krishna’s Strategy

Duryodhana, delighted by Bhishma’s pledge, carefully kept this plan a secret. He even ensured their conversation and the location of the arrows remained hidden. However, Krishna, ever vigilant, had his own plan in motion.

That night, as Duryodhana prepared to rest, his attendant informed him of a visitor—Arjuna. Duryodhana, though surprised, greeted Arjuna warmly, saying:

“Oh, Arjuna! Welcome! What brings you here? If it’s the kingdom you desire, I can give it to you right now.”

He was being sarcastic, knowing Arjuna would never ask for the kingdom. But Arjuna replied calmly:

“I am not here for the kingdom. That time has passed. But there is something I seek. During the fight with the Gandharvas long ago, you promised to grant me a boon. I have come to claim it tonight.”

Duryodhana, bound by his word and confident that Arjuna wouldn’t ask for anything significant, agreed.

The Clever Boon

Arjuna asked for the five arrows Bhishma had prepared to kill the Pandavas. Shocked but unable to refuse, Duryodhana reluctantly handed over the arrows. Arjuna then left with them, securing the Pandavas’ safety for another day.

When Bhishma learned of this the next morning, he understood Krishna’s involvement. Rather than being angry, Bhishma smiled and said:

“Krishna’s protection is invincible. No army can succeed if Krishna is on the opposite side.”

Though Bhishma acknowledged Krishna’s divine intervention, he remained steadfast in his duty as a warrior, determined to continue the battle.

The Episode with Duryodhana and the Gandharvas

While the Pandavas were in the forest, Duryodhana was captured by the Gandharvas. He had gone to humiliate them, showcasing his wealth, but instead, he was humiliated and imprisoned. Eventually, the Gandharvas released him, and this incident left a mark on Duryodhana.

At this point, Yudhishthira understood how to handle the situation. He knew Bhima was too angry to make a rational decision, so he approached him strategically. Yudhishthira told Bhima that if he ever had the opportunity to capture Duryodhana, it would be a great chance to humiliate him in return. Bhima’s anger blinded him, but when Yudhishthira pointed out that this would bring Bhima joy, Bhima understood the significance of the opportunity.

Arjuna’s Request

Although Bhima and Arjuna had both fought valiantly to rescue Duryodhana, the latter could not bring himself to express gratitude. However, Arjuna, with the guidance of Krishna, eventually took the opportunity to ask for a boon.

Arjuna approached Duryodhana and, after some conversation, asked him for the five celestial arrows that Bhishma had vowed to use to defeat the Pandavas. Duryodhana was shocked by this request. Although he had a sense of honor, he could not refuse, as he had once promised Arjuna a boon during their earlier fight with the Gandharvas.

Krishna’s Plan

Krishna, always a master strategist, had secretly orchestrated this request. He knew that Bhishma’s confidence in his vow to kill the Pandavas stemmed from the belief that Krishna would not intervene directly.

Even though Bhishma was determined to kill the Pandavas, he was waiting to see what Krishna would do. Bhishma’s anticipation was driven by a devotional curiosity about how Krishna would handle the situation. For Bhishma, this was more than just a battle—it was a test of Krishna’s divine power.

The Battle: Arjuna vs. Bhishma

On the battlefield, Krishna had made it clear that he would not pick up any weapons himself. So, when Bhishma declared that he would kill Arjuna unless Krishna raised a weapon to stop him, the stage was set for a dramatic confrontation.

For Arjuna, fighting Bhishma, his grandfather, was not easy. There was a deep emotional conflict—this was a family member, someone whom he respected greatly. Even though Arjuna had defeated Bhishma earlier at the Virata battle, it had been more of a demonstration of power, not a life-or-death struggle. But now, the stakes were high—one side would not leave the battlefield alive.

The Devastation of Halfheartedness

Bhishma fought fiercely, and Arjuna, caught in his emotional turmoil, struggled to fight wholeheartedly. As a result, the battle turned devastating for the Pandavas. Celestial weapons, much like nuclear weapons in modern warfare, were used as a last resort in times of great conflict. When these weapons were released, they had the power to not only defeat the targeted warrior but also wreak havoc on the surrounding army.

With Bhishma using celestial weapons and Arjuna fighting only halfheartedly, the Pandava army suffered severe losses. Arjuna was wounded, and the fate of the army seemed uncertain.

Krishna’s Intervention

Krishna, understanding the gravity of the situation, realized that if Bhishma continued to fight with full intensity, not only would Arjuna be killed, but the entire Pandava army could be destroyed. At that moment, Krishna made a pivotal decision—he appeared before Arjuna.

In the blink of an eye, Krishna appeared in front of Arjuna, suddenly disappearing from the battlefield and standing before his devotee.

Krishna’s Intervention on the Battlefield

What happened next was astonishing. Krishna suddenly jumped off the chariot, looking around. Arjuna saw Krishna running towards the wheel of the chariot and picking it up. But why did Krishna pick up a wheel of all things? It wasn’t just any wheel—it likely reminded him of his Sudarshan Chakra. But in that moment, filled with so much emotion and urgency, Krishna didn’t call for his Sudarshan. His heart was filled with anxiety and frustration, caught between what was right and wrong in that dire moment.

Krishna then charged toward Bhishma, his anger palpable. He yelled, “You are the cause of this entire war. When a king is foolish, it is the responsibility of the minister to be wise and to correct the king’s path. You failed to stop him, and that’s why this war is happening. You are responsible for this war, and therefore, you deserve to die.”

Seeing Krishna charge toward him, Bhishma, the great warrior, laid down his bow. He accepted that if death came at Krishna’s hands, it would be the perfection of life. Bhishma had tried his best to persuade the Kauravas, but they had not listened. The entire battlefield, stunned by the scene unfolding, came to a halt. It was as if the entire war paused, and every warrior watched in awe, just like spectators in a boxing match when a spectacular fight takes place.

Arjuna’s Plea

Arjuna, realizing the gravity of the situation, cried out, “Oh Krishna, please don’t fight! I promise I will kill Bhishma tomorrow.” But Krishna, overwhelmed with concern for Arjuna and anger toward Bhishma, didn’t hear a word Arjuna said. Arjuna, desperate to stop Krishna, jumped off his chariot and ran after him.

Normally, archery fights happen at a distance, but this moment was different. Arjuna knew he couldn’t reach Krishna in time on foot, so he took a mighty leap and landed beside Krishna. He caught hold of Krishna’s thigh as Krishna continued to charge forward. Krishna, with his incredible force, didn’t even realize Arjuna was holding onto him.

Finally, Arjuna, unable to keep up with Krishna’s speed, planted his feet firmly on the ground, creating a hole. His legs got stuck, and he held on tightly to Krishna’s thigh. At that moment, Krishna stopped. Arjuna, still gripping Krishna’s thigh, begged, “Krishna, please don’t break your vow. I promise I will kill Bhishma tomorrow.”

Resolution and Reflection

At that, Krishna calmed down. Arjuna and Krishna turned back, walking together. By this time, the sun was nearly setting, and the entire battlefield had come to a standstill. Warriors were left reflecting on the intensity of what had just occurred. No one had the heart to continue fighting.

Bhishma, sensing the tension in the air, signaled the end of the day’s hostilities. It was a profound moment that illustrated the deep complexity of the Mahabharata.

The Four Levels of Understanding

On one level, this episode shows the literal nature of war. But on a deeper, ethical level, it speaks to the human emotions and relationships involved. At an allegorical level, the symbolism is rich—Krishna’s actions are not just about the battlefield; they carry deeper meanings related to divine intervention and the cosmic order.

However, at the devotional level, the core of the story is the loving reciprocation between Krishna, Arjuna, and Bhishma. The battle itself becomes a subordinate reality, with the affection between the divine and the devotees being the greater truth.

In the complex dynamic between Arjuna, Krishna, and Bhishma, the bonds of love and devotion outweighed the battlefield’s hostility. Despite the war raging around them, these relationships were the heart of the Mahabharata.

The Ethical and Devotional Dimensions of the Battle

When Bhishma was fighting against Arjuna, it wasn’t just a physical fight. Bhishma wasn’t merely attacking Arjuna; he was fighting out of devotion. He wanted to provoke Krishna to intervene, to do something. So, in one sense, the battle between Arjuna and Bhishma was not simply a clash of warriors, but also an expression of deeper spiritual intentions.

When Arjuna attacked Bhishma, his attack was weak, because he wasn’t fighting with full resolve. On the other hand, when Bhishma attacked Arjuna, his strikes were strong, driven by a sense of dharma (righteousness) and devotion. This brings us to the ethical level. Bhishma fought with the understanding that he had a duty to protect the Kauravas, while Arjuna’s inner conflict made him hesitant.

The ethical level of the fight is about doing the right thing, even when it’s hard. But the deeper layer, the devotional level, is where Bhishma was coming from. He fought with the belief that Krishna would protect Arjuna. Bhishma had full confidence that Arjuna would not be killed because Krishna would intervene, and he was eager to see how Krishna would protect him. So, while Bhishma was attacking with strength, it was because of his deep faith that he believed Krishna would safeguard Arjuna.

Krishna’s Role in Protection

Now, let’s consider Krishna’s role in this moment. Krishna, on one level, is protecting Arjuna—he is the divine charioteer, ensuring Arjuna’s safety. But interestingly, Krishna is also protecting Bhishma, because Bhishma had made a vow. Bhishma had vowed that he would either kill Arjuna or force Krishna to pick up a weapon. Krishna, in protecting Arjuna, was also honoring that vow, ensuring that Bhishma’s word would be fulfilled without breaking it.

So, Krishna’s actions were multifaceted. On one level, Krishna was protecting his devotee, Arjuna, but on another level, he was respecting the vow that Bhishma had taken. This is a good example of how Krishna’s love for Arjuna didn’t negate his respect for Bhishma’s devotion and commitment.

The Ethical Complexity

This leads us to the ethical complexity of the entire situation. When Krishna speaks to Bhishma, he doesn’t say, “You are killing my devotee Arjuna, and therefore I will stop you.” Instead, Krishna says, “You are the cause of this war.” This brings us to the ethical dilemma faced by Bhishma and others in the Mahabharata.

In the Mahabharata, we often find the tension between virtue (dharma) and devotion (bhakti). People might have a strong sense of dharma, but it may not always align with their devotional path or divine will. Let’s break this down:

  • Virtue refers to performing one’s duty according to one’s role in society (dharma).
  • Devotion refers to one’s relationship with the divine, surrendering to God’s will.

Now, we can look at four possible scenarios:

  1. Virtue and devotion: This is where both dharma and bhakti align. Arjuna falls into this category—he has both virtue (following his Kshatriya dharma) and devotion (his unwavering faith in Krishna).
  2. Virtue, but no devotion: Karna fits here. He is virtuous, upholding his dharma, but lacks devotion to the divine.
  3. Neither virtue nor devotion: A person who does neither their dharma nor follows the path of devotion.
  4. Devotion, but no virtue: Someone who is devoted but doesn’t necessarily follow dharma.

Bhishma’s Position

Now, Bhishma is an interesting case. He is highly virtuous and dedicated to his dharma, yet when we analyze his role in the war, we see that he is not entirely aligned with devotion. Bhishma is virtuous, but his devotion is a bit more complicated. His devotion is to his vow, his duty to the Kauravas, and his respect for the warrior code. However, he is not as surrendered to Krishna as Arjuna is.

At this moment in the battle, Bhishma’s virtue does not always align with the divine will. Bhishma, like Arjuna, faces a dilemma—he is torn between his kshatriya dharma (the duty of a warrior) and his kuladharma (family duty). Arjuna faces a similar tension, torn between his duty as a warrior (Kshatriya dharma) and his love and affection for his family (kuladharma).

The Role of Dharma and Bhakti

The deeper message here is that there are different paths of dharma and devotion that people walk, and these paths can often seem to contradict each other. But in the end, what Krishna reveals is that Bhakti (devotion) transcends dharma (virtue), and it is through devotion to God that true spiritual wisdom is attained.

The Tension Between Dharma and Vows

Krishna tells Arjuna that his Kshatriya dharma is to fight. As a warrior, he must fulfill his duty in battle. Arjuna’s dilemma arises because, on the one hand, he is torn by his familial ties, and on the other, he must fight for what is right. Krishna advises him that Kshatriya dharma takes precedence in this context—Arjuna must fight, even if those he fights against are his own people.

For Bhishma, the situation is similar but more complex. Like Arjuna, Bhishma faces a tension between his Kshatriya dharma and his kuladharma (family duty). Bhishma is caught between his role as a protector and his vow to support the ruling king of his family, the Kauravas. While it is his Kshatriya dharma to protect the weak (including Arjuna, who is part of his family), he has taken a vow to support the ruling king, regardless of the moral complications.

Bhishma’s Vows and His Dilemma

Bhishma had made three significant vows:

  1. He would renounce any claim to kingship.
  2. He would never marry or have children, ensuring that his father’s line could continue through other heirs.
  3. He would always support and protect the ruling king of his family.

These vows were taken out of loyalty to his father, Shantanu, and his father’s wishes, particularly to ensure that Satyavati’s son would inherit the throne. Bhishma’s dedication to his father’s wishes was so strong that he chose to remain celibate and childless, to avoid any conflict with the line of succession.

However, Bhishma could not have foreseen the future complications of his vow. He could not predict that Duryodhana, a prince with questionable morality, would become the ruler of the Kauravas, supported by a weak king like Dhritarashtra. Bhishma felt bound by his vow to protect Duryodhana, even when he knew that Duryodhana’s actions were wrong.

The Wrong Dharma

Bhishma’s dharma became problematic because he chose the wrong path. He felt bound by his vow to support the Kauravas, but this led him to side with injustice. The true dharma would have been to stop Duryodhana and Krishna from taking actions that were morally wrong. Bhishma’s mistake was in not questioning his vow and the consequences of his decisions.

The wrong dharma for Bhishma was to remain loyal to Duryodhana and the Kauravas, even when they were committing wrongs. He should have recognized that his loyalty to Duryodhana was causing harm and should have taken a stand for what was right. Vidura, another wise character, had already left Duryodhana’s side, and Bhishma could have done the same. Instead, Bhishma stayed, feeling bound by his vow, which eventually led to tragic consequences.

The Importance of Decision-Making

Bhishma’s story illustrates the complexity of decision-making in life. When we face difficult choices, we often have multiple factors to consider. For Bhishma, his vow became the most important factor, overshadowing other considerations like moral integrity or justice. Similarly, we all face moments where we must make decisions based on various factors—duty, loyalty, love, or justice. Sometimes, our devotion to one aspect can cause us to overlook the larger ethical picture.

For example, you might be in a situation where you have to choose between attending a class or going to an important meeting at work. The decision depends on what you value most—your education, your career, or perhaps something else entirely. In the case of Bhishma, his devotion to his vow became his guiding force, even though it led him into a morally questionable position.

The Tension Between Dharma and Bhakti

When we make decisions in life, we often have to consider multiple factors. Sometimes it’s about prioritizing one thing over another—whether it’s a family matter, a job, or a country’s welfare. For some people, one factor might outweigh the others, becoming the most important thing for them. For Bhishma, his vow to his father became the most important thing, and because of this, he made decisions that, although well-intentioned, were ultimately wrong.

Bhishma’s decisions had far-reaching consequences, especially because of his influential position. His choices, though made with a sincere heart and devotion, led to catastrophic results. From a devotional perspective, Bhishma acted with devotion to Krishna. On the fourth day of the battle, he even spoke of Krishna’s glories, attempting to sway Duryodhana to reconsider his actions, but Duryodhana’s stubbornness prevented him from doing so.

The Balance Between Dharma and Bhakti

When we look at dharma and bhakti together, we find that there is a dynamic relationship. One extreme is neglecting dharma in favor of bhakti, or vice versa. For example, someone may justify doing something wrong because they are a devotee, saying, “It’s okay because I’m a devotee.” The other extreme is when people question someone’s devotion because they feel the person isn’t doing what they think is right. Krishna, however, strikes a balance between both.

With respect to Bhishma, publicly, Krishna did not neglect the consequences of Bhishma’s actions. Bhishma was wounded and attacked, and Krishna instructed Arjuna to fight against him. Bhishma’s defeat was necessary as part of the greater plan. However, privately, Krishna honored Bhishma. After the war, Krishna went to Bhishma and praised him, recognizing his devotion and commitment. So while actions in this world have consequences, Krishna understood that Bhishma acted out of devotion and rewarded him for that.

Dharma and Bhakti in the Material World

In this world, dharma enables us to function in society, while bhakti connects us with Krishna. Ideally, both should go together, and bhakti can actually help us perform dharma better. For instance, while driving, you should obey the traffic rules. A devotee once told me that when they were driving above the speed limit, they didn’t worry because they believed that Krishna was with them. But we must remember that while bhakti can guide us, dharma still governs our actions in the material world, and failure to follow it can lead to consequences.

This tension between dharma and bhakti is something Krishna addresses in the Mahabharata. On the one hand, Krishna chastises Bhishma publicly because of the choices he made, but he does not overlook Bhishma’s devotion. Krishna values Bhishma’s devotion, and after the war, he rewards Bhishma’s sincerity. Bhishma’s departure is regarded as the ideal departure because he left the world with love for Krishna, despite the tension between his dharma and his vows.

The Ethical Complexity of Bhishma’s Decision

In the end, Bhishma‘s decisions were based on the dharma he saw as most important—his vow to his father and his loyalty to the Kauravas. However, this commitment led him to choose the wrong side, even when he knew the Pandavas were in the right. His fixation on honoring his vow prevented him from seeing the larger moral picture.

From a devotional perspective, Krishna may have orchestrated the events to show that even a warrior like Bhishma, if fighting on the wrong side, will be defeated. But from an ethical perspective, Bhishma’s reasoning was that his dharma as a protector and a loyal servant to the ruling king (even one as misguided as Duryodhana) required his participation on the side of the Kauravas.

I think this is stored in the Mahabharata, and it was a miscalculation. Bhishma still held onto some hope. As I mentioned earlier, on the fourth day of the battle, he spoke strongly about Krishna’s glories. We’ll also see on the tenth day, when Bhishma falls, he requests to end the war. He asks, “Let the war end.” In one sense, Bhishma still had hope that Duryodhana would come to his senses. It wasn’t that Bhishma was blindly committed to his vow with no other consideration. He believed that by sticking to his vow and talking to Duryodhana, he could guide him toward the right path. However, this did not happen.

We’ll see how things turn out in the next session. Let me quickly summarize what we discussed today. We focused on three main points:

  1. Our Approach to the Mahabharata: We are primarily concerned with the controversies in the Mahabharata, while also drawing life lessons and exploring the bhakti rasa.
  2. Controversies: These can arise from three sources:
    • Cultural differences of the time
    • Interpretations made by different people throughout history
    • The inherent complexity of the situation

In today’s discussion, we primarily focused on how Bhishma’s actions were influenced by the complexity of the situation. His actions were not driven by anger toward Arjuna or Duryodhana. He fought them, but that wasn’t the core reason for his behavior. Instead, he was motivated by the anticipation of witnessing Krishna’s love in action and seeing how Krishna would protect His devotees. This gave him the strength to continue fighting.

  1. The Tension Between Two Dharmas: Bhishma’s internal conflict was between two dharmas. He chose his vow, but that choice led him to prioritize loyalty over the protection of the weak and the righteous. This wasn’t simply a matter of religious duty, but a wrong choice of dharma.

We also discussed the four quadrants of dharma and bhakti:

  • Dharma and Bhakti together is Arjuna.
  • Dharma without Bhakti is Karna.
  • Karna, though rooted in dharma, ultimately chose adharma due to his circumstances. We saw how he shifted from dharma to adharma and back again.

Finally, we’ll explore how Krishna handled the relationship between dharma and bhakti. Did Krishna neglect adharma for the sake of bhakti, or did he neglect bhakti for the sake of adharma? We’ll delve deeper into this in tomorrow’s session.

Thank you very much for your attention today. I wish there was time for questions, but I’ll leave it here for now.

The post Part 1: Those 18 Days @ Mahabharat – HG Chaitanya Charan Prabhuji @ Bhakti Center Gachibowli appeared first on The Spiritual Scientist.

5 Six characteristics of bhakti – Last four characteristics
→ The Spiritual Scientist


Hare, Krishna. So thank you for coming today for this last session in our series. And, today we will talk about the 4 remaining characteristics of bhakti. In the first session, we talked about how these characteristics if we consider like a flower stalk, these are like petals are they are conjoined petals. So they are on two sides.

The first are more related with first two are more related with us. That what Bhakti will do to us, kleshaagni and shubhada. So we discussed for this for one session and then after that we elaborated on this. So next are more characteristics of bhakti itself. It is what are the next two characteristics?

Moksha. Moksha laguta. So moksha is liberation. Moksha laghu. Laghu is small.

So laguta kruta. It makes moksha seem small and then there is sudurlabha. So these 2 are more related with bhakti itself, the nature of bhakti. And then then there is. So this is more in terms of both of these are more is the soul’s experience.

What are the soul’s experience? And last is Krishna. So Krishna Akarshani. It attracts even Krishna. So this is more in terms of you can say Krishna’s experience.

This is experience at the spiritual level. Whether it’s our experience or Krishna’s experience. So we discussed about how relationships themselves have some characteristics. So now, here, in one sense, there is a common denominator to all the various vedic traditions that were there in India. There are 6 systems of philosophy.

There are different schools of thought. So we could say the first two characteristics are almost common to any spiritual path. Every spiritual path will say that it will free you from distress. And it will give you happiness. That’s what everyone is looking for.

So even the path of impersonal liberation, that will also say that, okay. Claysh agni will happen. The claysh is because of material existence. And when you become free from material existence, you’ll become free from claysh. And within their understanding, okay, the auspiciousness is when we become one with the unending ocean of white light that is Brahman.

So these, you can say, are common to all spiritual paths. They’re common in the sense that the specifics of how bhakti provides them are different. But it is like, if you go back to the medicine metaphor, whether somebody takes Ayurveda or allopathy or naturopathy, the result that is promised is the same. That your disease will go away and your health will come back. So in that sense, there bhakti, these two characteristics are not unique.

These two characteristics or these two results are promised even by those who seek Guyana, the path of Guyana to achieve Moksha. So that’s why the next characteristic becomes important. That moksha also gives this, but no. What bhakti offers, it makes moksha seem insignificant. Now this itself is an extraordinary claim because moksha is what, the great sages who renounce the world pursue, And it is not, any ordinary attainment.

It’s very, very difficult to attain. So then why would somebody say that, okay. You know, this is it makes moksha seem insignificant. That is there there’s a reason. Now we can go into Shastric references how Rupakha Swami says that if there is the happiness moksha, there is Brahmananda.

That like a drop and if you multiply a drop thousands of times, it will become like an ocean. And the ocean of bhakti is like that. So Bhakti Ananda is so great. Like, if we get an ocean, then we’ll feel what is the point of a drop. It has no value.

So the same theme comes in the last verse of the 8th chapter, 8.32. So whatever will come by any other path, all that will come and more will come for the person who takes to Bhakti and comes to Krishna. So these are scriptural statements. So we can have this characteristic. We can understand it through a metaphor.

The metaphor is of a drop and ocean. We can also under understand it through scriptural reference. There are many references which are given. Let’s try to understand this primarily now through logic. So is it just because we are bhaktas, we claim that the happiness of Bhakti is greater?

And those who are pursuing Moksha, they will say that the happiness of Moksha is greater. No. There is a particular underlying theme over here. So the theme is that in the impersonal path and the personal path, In both, there is an acknowledgment of suffering. No.

See suffering is universal. If we tell people this whole many people may say you are being so pessimistic. But, okay. So yours was given to me, is it? Okay.

Thank you. So in one sense, suffering is universal. Like, we may say that if we say this only Dukkaleya, people may say you’re being so pessimistic. But I have traveled across the world spoken to different audiences. And sometimes I start by saying, no.

We all may have different upbringings. We may have different, religious world views. We may have different philosophical conceptions. But we all can agree on one thing. What is that one thing?

It can be summarized in 3 words. Life is tough. Isn’t it? Isn’t it? We may be very wealthy.

We may be very famous. We may be very popular. We may be very talented but life is not easy for anyone. Now the level of difficulty for different people may be different. There may be some subjectivity in what is considered difficult.

For somebody who doesn’t have any food to eat at all, that is a different kind of difficulty. And somebody who doesn’t come first in the class, you may say, what is the difficulty for them? Because they may experience emotional pain that can be very large. Somebody comes to the World Cup finals and loses in the World Cup finals. You see, your pain is nothing as compared to somebody who’s starving.

But still for them, it’s a very intense pain. So the point is life is tough. So actually, life is tough is just a restatement of when the Gita says the world is. But what happens is, when we say the world is, people feel it is pessimistic. Why?

Because it becomes a statement of the nature of the world. And people feel if you say this world is then there is no hope for me. But, whereas, when you say life is tough, it is a statement of empathy. It is a statement of shared human experience. So life is tough.

And everybody wants relief from the toughness of life. So now, why is life so difficult? What can we do to get relief from the toughness and the difficulties of life? So, this is where personalism and impersonalism have a different diagnosis. Like, sometimes we may have some fever and we may go to different doctors.

And one doctor may say this is, you know, this is just seasonal flu. Another doctor may say this is malaria. So spiritual doctor may say there’s malle in the area of your heart. Isn’t it? But whatever it is, there can be different diagnosis.

So, suppose there is a patient and they they have got some disease like arthritis. And when they got arthritis, even a small movement, they move their hand, ah, there’s pain. They move their leg, there’s pain. If the arthritis are all over the body. Even if they hear a joke and they laugh.

They laugh a little bit and they feel pain. So any movement of the body causes pain. So then what happens is, the impersonal, there’s pain and pain comes from movement. So the solution that is thought is, if there is no movement, then there will be no pain. So this is one way a patient may diagnose.

Okay. I want to be free from pain, therefore I should just be able to stop moving. I can just stop moving, then I’ll be free from pain. So like this, what the impersonal thing is? Desires.

They cause bondage. And what is it? It is qualities in this world that lead to desires. You know, something is attractive, hey, I want this. Something smells bad, I want to go away from this.

So qualities lead to desires and desires lead to entanglement. They lead to bondage. So the impersonalist solution is, if there are no qualities, then there’ll be no desires. And if there are no desires, then there’ll be the bondage. You can say bondage and suffering go together.

When we are bound to something like alcohol, like is bound to alcohol, they suffer. So then there is no bondage and no suffering. So this is the diagnosis of the impersonalists. And that’s why the Okay. That’s why the impersonalist diagnosis is that actually all qualities in this world are false.

Even the qualities we attribute to God, they are also false. They’re also Maya. Becoming attracted to the qualities of God, maybe, not maybe, is better than being attracted to the qualities of people in this world. But ultimately, even that is Maya. So, we need to go beyond it all.

And then what happens is, then there will be just the state of existence. Just just just pure consciousness. See, sometimes we say impersonalism means what? You say some people, there’s a famous impersonalist who went to America and he said, there are many gurus in the past who came and said that I am God. So he said, I’m not such a guru.

I’m not a guru who has come to tell you I am God. I’m the guru who has come to tell you, you are God. In one college in America, I saw a t shirt on one boy I was wearing. I was an atheist till I discovered I was God. So, now this is a common understanding of impersonalism.

That we will merge and you will become God. However, this is not the actual understanding of impersonalism. See, there is maya wad and there is what you can call as neo maya wad. Means So this is a distortion from what taught. So hold that we are all gods.

I’m going a little bit into impersonalism over here because it’s important to understand what means. So they say we are all gods. But actual holds that that even God is an illusion. So their idea is that there is only Brahman that exists. Brahman is the only reality.

When Brahman comes in contact with it becomes When Brahman comes in contact with rajas, it becomes When Brahman comes in contact with tamas, it becomes Prakriti. It becomes material nature. Now this is not the correct philosophy. Don’t note it down as the correct philosophy. This is their idea.

And they say, what happens first? The g y is attached to prakrti. The g y is attached to prakrti and this causes bondage. So first, we need to understand that prakrti is Maya. And many impersonalists will also practice bhakti.

Because they say, actually, for the jiva Is this color visible? Okay. For the jiva to become attached to is good because the jiva can become detached from prakrti. So, so this is, this is the lowest. This is the lowest level and this is an intermediate level.

But afterwards, when you truly advance, you will understand that actually the jiva is Maya and ishwar is also Maya. So the only thing that exists is Brahman. So, Brahma satya, Jagannmithya. So it’s not just Jagannmithya, jivamithya, and Ishwar alsomithya. So so the imperialist idea is that, there is only existence.

There’s no activity, there are no desires, there is no reciprocation. So it is very similar to what? Oh, all activity causes pain, therefore, give up all activity. All relationships, all desires cause pain, therefore give up all desires. And how can we give up all desires?

By believing that everything desirable itself is Maya. But this is not the Bhakti understanding. See, the the if you consider, go back over here, the same patient can understand that, okay, actually, I’m experiencing pain. And pain occurs whenever there is movement. However, the cause of the pain is a disease.

That, when there is a disease, because there is arthritis, at that time when I move my hand, there is pain. So, if there is no disease, then there can be movement and there will be no pain. In fact, there can be pleasure. Now, when we move, we can run, we can dance, we can see various places. And movement, action is the basis of joy.

So similarly, in the bhakti understanding, the problem is not that qualities lead to desires and desires lead to bondage and suffering. The problem is that these are temporary qualities. So it’s like temporary quality. When we are attracted to things with temporary qualities, then we have material desires. And material desires lead us to bondage and suffering.

Why? Because what the things that we are attached to, they go away. Or we go away from the things that we are attached. Now, we may earn a lot of wealth, but somehow the stock market crash and the wealth goes away. Or we may earn a lot of wealth, but then we grow old and we die and then we go away from the wealth.

So either way. So, however, if there are eternal qualities and eternal qualities are present in Krishna. So when there are eternal qualities, toward those eternal qualities, there are desires, there are spiritual desires. And these desires, they actually lead to liberty, freedom and even ecstasy. That these desires, the desire to serve Krishna, that brings joy.

What happens is the more our consciousness is filled with the desire to serve Krishna, the more we’ll become free from other desires. And the more we become free from other desires, the more we become absorbed in Krishna. The more we can remember Krishna. The more we can become happy. So suppose there is some small child and when the child is sick, the mother has to give medicine to the child and the child doesn’t like to take medicine.

So the mother has to hold the mouth of the child. Open the mouth. And the child is given the medicine. Now, one day, the mother wants to give the child delicious kheer. And the mother says, take this.

The child says, no. And the mother says, take it. No. And the mother holds that and gives it. And the child just doesn’t want to take it.

The child starts shaking the head violently. And the child shakes the head violently and what happens? All the curious falls in the mouth and spills away. But even through that, if the mother keeps pawing, then what happens? Slowly a few drops start going in.

And then as the drops start going in, the child is shaking the head. So similarly for us, right now, we have so many other desires that even when Krishna comes into our consciousness, the remembrance of Krishna is like drinking kheer. But we think, oh, watching TV is better. You know, political use is better. Credit sports is better.

Stock market prices is better. So even when the opportunity to focus on Krishna is there, we don’t focus on Krishna. That it’s extremely joyful. But we don’t feel it because we are distracted. Pogaishva prasakthana pagaishva prasakthana pagaishthaam.

Krishna says, when we are caught with desires of sense enjoyment and worldly profit and wealth, then those desires drag our consciousness. And thus, That steadiness to focus on Krishna and experience samadha. That doesn’t happen. But somehow, we, like the mother holds the child firmly like that. We, without buddhi, hold our mind firmly.

So our intelligence is like the mother and our mind is like the child. So if we just hold our mind steadily, then gradually we’ll start experiencing that this is something extraordinary. That, you know, okay, I like music. There are there there are there is movie songs and there are these other songs. I like all of them.

But then if we keep hearing Krishna Kirtan, we’ll find that initially this is also just another music. Sometimes nice, sometimes not nice. But as we keep hearing it, we will start realizing there is something extraordinary in this. It just transports me to another level of reality. So, just as a person who was sick and couldn’t move at all, if they stop moving, they do get relief from pain.

But if they get healed, and they can travel and they can trek and they can dance, then the joy of dancing is 100 and 1000 of times greater than the relief of feeling no pain because of being motionless, isn’t it? So similarly, just having no desire at all. It’s very difficult to be in that state but if somehow, just as it’s very difficult to just be completely motionless. But even if somebody came to that state of having no desire at all, that state will not last for long. And even if we could stay in that state, there is there is only relief.

There is not really joy over there. On the other hand, when we find something truly desirable and we pursue that and we get joy in that. And when we pursue Krishna, the soul is eternal. Krishna is eternal. The bond between the 2 of them is eternal.

That’s why it is It’s an ocean of happiness and that too vardhanam. It’s an ocean of happiness that keeps expanding. So this is how moksha laghuta krta. What bhakti does is, it makes the happiness of moksha seem like insignificant. So moksha is like relief from pain.

But Bhakti or Bhaktyananda is like the joy of dancing. Joy of trekking. The joy of moving about freely. So this is far, far greater. Now, this is moksha lagutta kruta.

Now, the other characteristic correspondingly is su durlabha. Su durlabha means extremely rare. Now, why is Bhakti so rare? It is not that Krishna does not want to give Bhakti. Rather, Krishna wants to know whether we want Bhakti.

He wants to see our desires. The Bhagavadam says, Krishna Krishna says, I’ll give mukti easily, but I will not give bhakti. I’ll not give Prema. Why? That is related with the last point.

What happens is when there is love, love actually conquers Krishna. So Ajithopya Sita Strelokyam, the Bhagavatam says. That Lord who is unconquerable becomes conquered by Lao, by Bhakti. So the example could be, if there is a King. The King can, if there is a prisoner, There’s a prisoner.

Now there’s one thing is to release the prisoner. That also is a big thing for the prisoner. That is a big thing. And from the prisoner’s perspective, being released can be a great source of relief. But on the 8th, the king adopts as a prince.

That’s a very big thing, isn’t it? So if the king is going to adopt as a prince, that means this person becomes a member of their family. So you could say every citizen also has a responsibility of the king. But that is very different from a member of the direct direct member of the family, the prince. So a king giving release is like Krishna giving Moksha.

But Krishna giving Bhakti is like Krishna adopting. Now Krishna doesn’t have to adopt us because we are already his children. But when we are to go back to Krishna’s abode, at that time, Bhagopal says in my lecture, that you know Krishna, Krishna is reciprocating pure love with His devotees, His pure devotees. And He doesn’t want those who are not pure devotees to disturb Him. It’s like, suppose we have not yet become purified.

And Krishna takes us to the spiritual world. And there everybody is talking about Krishna. Everybody is delighting in talking about Krishna. And we ask, okay, when is the when is the next cricket world cup? Who won the cricket match?

You know, we go to the spiritual world. Going there is not just simply a matter of physical relocation. There has to be the redirection of our heart toward Krishna. So we enter into Krishna’s intimate family. So when it is dulabha, at one level we can say it is so dulabha, there are 2 ways of understanding it.

One is, Krishna does not give easily. And it’s true. It’s like, King will not adopt a prisoner and a Prince very easily. But there’s but the other thing is, because we do not desire strongly. In the same Bhakti r Samrath Sindhu, later on it is said, what is the price of Krishna consciousness?

Intense greed, yes. Krishna bhava or that that the tatra laulayam api maulayamikalam. Just I have to have intense desire for it. So that level of desire is actually difficult to develop. It is the problem for us, sadhakas, is that say right now we are in what in our methodology called no man’s land.

See there is the world of Maya and there is the world of Krishna. And now we are somewhere in between. We are not fully in Maya, but we are not fully in Krishna also. So for us, how it is? And, yeah, Krishna is nice, but, you know, Maya is also not that bad, isn’t it?

So that’s why our desire is not very strong. And the problem is often, like, Krishna is invisible to us. And Maya is ultra visible to us. So, because Maya is ultra visible, the desire for Maya tends to become very strong. So this desire is generally developed through the eyes.

Whereas this desire is developed through the ears. We need to hear about Krishna. The more we hear about Krishna, the more we understand His glory. And the more we understand His glory, the more the desires develop. So it is rare.

The Bhakti is rare because the level of, that level of desire for Krishna is extremely rare. That even among many people who may become devotees, even those who become extraordinarily great devotees, for them to have the level of desire, I desire Krishna and nothing but Krishna. That is not easy. Because in this world, there are so many things which come up. And sometimes in Bhakti, there are good things also which we may need to give up for Krishna’s sake.

See, there is this remarkable thing about Srila Prabhupada. The previous point we said about how, you know, bhakti is about desiring Krishna. Isn’t it? Krishna we understand Krishna is eternal and we desire Krishna. So Prabhupada for most of his life was a grahastha.

And he tried very hard through his grahastha ashram to assist his guru’s mission by expanding his business and trying to offer financial support. Krishna had some other plans. But the point is that there were other disciples of Bhakti Salaam Suttaqur who were also great souls in their own way. But some of them were sannyasis throughout their life. Some of them were they didn’t have grasp the responsibility.

They could study shastra throughout their life. They could, learn Sanskrit very deeply. Prabhupada, he read most of the Shastra that he read while he was traveling. In his business, he would travel all over India. While in his travels, he read books.

So there could have been other godbrothers of Prabhupada who might have been more renounced than him or more scholarly than him. There may have been. What differentiated Prabhupada from them was the strength of his desire. That he had the strongest desire to fulfill his spiritual master’s mission. It was not that, Bhakti Sajan Thakur gave that instruction to preach in the west just to 1 or 2 disciples.

Like a standing instruction to all his disciples. But Prabhupada took it up. So Prabhupada had such a strong desire and because of that desire, he was at the age of 70. You know, love is seen generally by 2 things. What we give to our beloved and what we give up for our beloved.

Like, what we if parents love their children, the parents may want to offer the best education to their children. You know, you can get the best books, the best tuition classes, the best facilities. What we give to our beloved. But, say, you know, we want our child to be child in a hostel. We want the child to be in an AC room, so we have limited money.

We say, okay. I’ll remove the AC from my house and I’ll have AC for you. So what we give to our beloved and what we give up for our beloved. So love is seen by both these things. So at one level if we see, Srila Prabhupada, what did he give?

He gave his entire life. His entire life means even at the age of 70, he went all alone and he his last years were years of total dedication. He traveled tirelessly. No. You know, I am not even half as half as old as Prabhupada.

But when we travel, we often get jet lag. Prabhupada had no jet lag at all. It’s amazing how much energy Prabhupada had. So he was tireless. So Prabhupada has strong desire to serve Krishna.

But along with that, you know, so generally when we desire something very strongly so Prabhupada built 108 temples for Krishna. Prabhupada wrote 70 books. Now among all the temples that Prabhupada built, there was one temple for which Prabhupada endeavored the most. Which was that temple? Juhu temple.

Yes. And no. Srila Prabhupada departed in November 77. And the Juhu temple was inaugurated in January 78. Sankranti time, more or less.

They are just 2 months away. And Prabhupada could have said to Krishna, Krishna, I worked so hard for this temple. Just let me see the inauguration of this temple. Let me see that and then I will live peacefully. But when Prabhupada asked towards the last days, do you have any last desires?

And Prabhupada said, kuch ichanahi. Kuch ichanahi. So Prabhupada did not see that, oh, if I am not there, how will this temple be inaugurated? He saw himself as an instrument. He saw that Krishna has a role for me.

And it’s like on a play, in a drama, the director has a role for a player. And the director says, no. Come back from the stage. He says, no. I want to play more.

No. Come back. Prabhupada’s attachment to Krishna was more than even his attachment to build a temple for Krishna. And that’s how he was ready to give up his desire to see the Juhu temple. He did everything for Krishna.

He fought like a warrior to build a temple. But when Krishna’s call came, Prabhupada gracefully accepted that. So leave alone material attachment that can distract us from Krishna, Prabhupada demonstrated how even spiritual attachments did not distract him from Krishna. So that is the glory of Srila Prabhupada. So bhakti is rare not because Krishna withholds it, but it’s because that level of desire for Krishna is rare.

And it is by associating with devotees who have such desire that we get the desire. When we hear from devotees who are filled with love for Krishna, who are filled with the dreams of serving Krishna, then we also get surcharged by that desire. Bhakti sanjayate bhakti. That’s why association of devotees is so important. And it’s not that in association we just discuss Prajalva.

In association, we discuss about Krishna, then our heart becomes energized with desires for Krishna. So this is how Then we go to the last two characteristics. We have discussed both of them partly. But the first is Now the word this is a little complicated. Now in that there’s means bliss, ecstasy, joy.

Now Sandra means intense or concentrated. Means, this is a very special experience at the level of the soul. It is concentrated, intense, spiritual experience. What do we mean here by concentrated? See, it is there are many different kinds of pleasures.

Say, like, people watch movies. Now I was in America. I was invited at one time to my first in 2014, I started going to America. You know, the first year I was invited to many college programs. So I lost track of which all programs I was going to.

So when I was going to one program, I asked the devotees, which is this university? And they said, this is the American Institute of illusion. Now what does that mean? At that time, I wiped away the America itself was an institute of illusion. It’s spreading materialism all over the world.

But my point but it is actually the college where how movies are made. You know, how to do cinematography, how to do choreography, how to direction, how to do video editing, all that is taught. It’s one such college. So now there are 100 even thousands of movies that are made every year. But some movies become flops.

You know? What is the opposite of a flop? Hit. Okay. So some movies few movies are hits.

Many are flops. Now, why do many movies flop? Audience doesn’t like. Why does the audience not like? Because the illusion is not good enough.

Isn’t it? See, people want to forget the boredom and the minority of their life. And when they are watching a movie, you know, if the acting is not good, if the plot is unrealistic, whatever it is. If the illusion is not good enough, then the spell breaks and then you don’t enjoy it. So what happens is that in all material enjoyment, It is always interrupted or it is dissipated enjoyment.

What do you mean interrupted? Like in a movie, I might enjoy one dialogue. But after all other dialogues are so boring. You might enjoy one fight scene, you know, one dance sequence, but others are boring. So in real life, whatever enjoyment we get, you know, it is not like complete immersive enjoyment where everything is enjoyable and there is nothing to complain about.

There’s always something that is disappointing. Okay. You know, in this part of the world, okay, you know, the culture is good, but the work work is too much. Or, you know, this is not right. That is not right.

Like, many people from who come to here, may want to go to America. Now America, maybe the glamour is more. But then you don’t get get any maids or any staff for I’ll help you get work at home. So everything you have to do on your own. There are challenges.

So that every that every happy experience in this world is diluted and contaminated by something unsatisfactory. So now we may say, okay. You know, I had a I had a meal. This was a delightful meal. Everything was wonderful.

Okay. It may happen one time but it doesn’t happen each time. So that so it’s like when you say there is no happiness in this world which is fully satisfying. The one one thing is satisfying but the other thing is not so satisfactory. So nothing is fully satisfying.

We can all think of whatever dreams we may have had. Some of the dreams are fulfilled. But then, what happens? Okay. One part of this is wonderful, but another part is not.

They say love is blind, but marriage is an eye opener. Isn’t it? So when people say they’re in love, that is completely mad and thinking that the other person is is a fulfillment of all my dreams. Now even if the other person is wonderful, still everybody is human. So everybody has their limitations.

So what happens is that there is no undiluted, uncontaminated happiness in this world. Every happy experience is contaminated. But the experience of Krishna is satisfying at every level. In the Chaitanyaartha Amruta, the example is given that Krishna, enters into and enchants every one of our senses. The sight, the form of Krishna is extraordinary.

The fragrance of Krishna is extraordinary. The music of Krishna is extraordinary. The sound that comes through the ears. Everything about Krishna is enriching, is enchanting. And in that sense, the happiness that we get by immersion in Krishna, there is no interruption in that.

There’s no dilution in that. No contamination in that. So, why? Because Krishna is Krishna is not just Akarsha but Sarva Akarsha. He is all attractive.

Now, getting this experience takes time. Right now, for us, maybe one aspect of Krishna is attractive. Maybe we like kirtans. But, you know, we don’t like japa so much. We don’t like, maybe everybody likes prasad.

We all like feasting. Most of us don’t like fasting. So there’s some things about Krishna consciousness we like right now, some things we don’t like. But when we come to the level of pure universal service, everything about Krishna becomes joyful. In the spiritual world, there is separation from Krishna also.

But even in separation, there is actually a greater immersion in Krishna. There is a greater remembrance of Krishna. And that is why, actually, the devotee becomes even more joyful. Yes. The devotee wants union with Krishna, But it’s like, at the material level there is enjoyment and there is suffering.

At the spiritual level there is union and there is separation. Now, the basic experience of material level is an illusion. So it is like poison. Now material enjoyment is like sweet poison. Material suffering is like bitter poison.

But it’s still poison. At the spiritual level, remembrance of Krishna is like nectar. Union with Krishna is like sweet nectar. Separation from Krishna is like bitter nectar. It is bitter but it’s still nectar.

It is bitter but it’s still better than even the sweet sweet poison of metal existence. The Chetan Chetan would use the example that this is like hot sugarcane juice. It’s it’s sugarcane juice. It’s delicious. We can’t stop drinking it.

But it’s hot, we feel I can’t drink it. So but the point is everything about Krishna is joyful. And Bhakti helps us connect with Krishna, become absorbed with Krishna. And that’s why it’s intense concentrated bliss. And then the last aspect of this Bhakti is is Krishna Akarshini.

That bhakti attracts even Krishna. So the idea here is that Krishna is all attractive. And yet, Krish while Krishna at one level is complete, he doesn’t need anything. He’s called Atmarama. Ultimately, those who become devoted to Krishna also become Atmarama.

They become self satisfied. And yet, when a devotee’s heart is filled with love for Krishna, Krishna is amazed that what is it in me that attracts these devotees so much to me? Like, say, Krishna is here, and say, we are here. So, now, this is the bond of Bhakti. So what bhakti does is that bhakti, with bhakti we become attracted to Krishna.

So when we become attracted to Krishna, we experience joy. But the joy we experience is so great that Krishna start thinking, what is this joy that they are experiencing? So even Krishna becomes attracted. And Krishna also wants to experience it. So Krishna, He is so joyful.

He is so He is so charmed by the devotee’s heart. You know, Krishna becomes Chaitanya Mahaprabhu to experience bhakti. See, Krishna can experience everything, but Krishna can’t experience bhakti because He is the object of bhakti. His object means He’s the receiver of devotion. He wants to be the he wants to be the offeror or the giver of devotion.

So Krishna comes over here and he becomes this bhakti is so sweet, so intoxicating, so enriching that it attracts even Krishna. So in every religious tradition it is said that God is supreme. There is true through that, but in the Bhakti tradition, there is and there is In yes, Krishna is supreme. But in lila, actually it is bhakti that is supreme. It is, in the spiritual world, it is not that God is supreme.

It is love that is supreme. And that is why Krishna hides his Godhood. Krishna in the spiritual world is not acting as if he is God. He is acting as a sweet lovable child. Why?

Because he he wants he is attracted to Bhakti. He wants that sweet reciprocation of love. And that’s why he conceals his godhood so that his devotees can love him uninhibited. The devotees all if Yashoda may always remember, Krishna is God. And she can’t chastise him.

She can’t discipline him. Her love would become interrupted. So what happens is that Krishna through yoga Maya conceals his godhood. So Krishna does not delight so much in exhibiting his godhood as in experiencing the reciprocation of love. So in the spiritual world, it is bhakti that reigns supreme.

In Barsana, there is a place called Maan Mandir where Radharani becomes upset with Krishna. And then Krishna goes there, and Krishna, while seeking forgiveness from Radharani, bows down and touches his head to Radharani’s foot. Now everybody touches their head to Krishna’s foot, but Krishna, he subordinates himself to Radharani. So that is how Bhakti attracts even Krishna. And there is this is the supreme glory of Bhakti.

Krishna attracts everyone, but Bhakti attracts even Krishna. The world is attracted by Madan. Madan is attracted by Madan Mohan. And Madan Mohan is attracted by Madan Mohan Mohini. And that Madan Mohan Mohini is actually the embodiment of bhakti.

So the glories of bhakti are ultimately the glories of shrimati Radharani. Because Radharani is the embodiment of bhakti. And it is that Radharani’s mercy that we seek when we try to practice bhakti. These are her glories and by understanding her glories, by appreciating her glories, by getting her blessings, we will ultimately be united with Krishna. So I’ll summarize what we discussed today.

We discussed 4 color characters of Bhakti, the last 4. The first was how becomes insignificant. This was where I spent a lot of time. I explained how suffering is universal, but the impersonal diagnosis of suffering is, it is incomplete. The incomplete diagnosis is that pain is caused by is movement and should stop movement.

So the incomplete diagnosis is that, actually bondage is suffering is what we want to avoid. So suffering comes because of desires. Desires come because of qualities. So they say that give up qualities and we’ll give you desires, we’ll give up suffering. But actually, what the personal understanding is that there are there are eternal qualities and Krishna has eternal qualities.

And when we dwell on Krishna, we get spiritual desires. And through the spiritual desires, we don’t get suffering, we get ecstasy. We get the supreme happiness. So it’s like the relief, no pain versus dancing. No pain through no motion.

The joy of dancing is far far greater. So the joy of Bhakti is far greater. And the second was we discussed two reasons for it. 1st is, like the king may release a prisoner, but the other is to adopt as a prince. So this itself is rare.

But more it is Krishna gives this rarely, but more that, the desire for Krishna to be greater than the desire for anything else. Anything material or spiritual. This is what is rare. And we discussed how had a great desire to offer the best of this world to Krishna, to spread Krishna portions all over the world. But then Prabhupada was ready to his desire to please Krishna was more than his desire to see the temple that he had made to please Krishna.

So we saw about how love is seen by what we give and what we give up. So Prabhupada was ready to even give up his own plan his plans for serving Krishna. And then we discussed about So here the idea is material pleasure is is always interrupted. It is diluted because it is not everything is enjoyable. But with Krishna, He’s all attractive.

So, therefore, the experiences of concentrated bliss with no interruption. Every aspect of Krishna is attracted. Krishna is the complete sense object for the purified soul. And the last is Krishna. So we discussed how Krishna attracts everything in this world.

But that Krishna so in the spiritual world, what is supreme at one level is Krishna. But another level it is? It is bhakti. It is love that is supreme. And in terms of, but in terms of lila, what actually happens in the spiritual world?

So because love reigns supreme, Krishna himself subordinates his godhood. So Krishna is attracted by love and so Krishna, he does not show his godhood. He actually subordinates his godhood for the purpose of love, for uninhibited love. That is how great love is and it is that love. So ultimately, this love, this bhakti that attracts Krishna is non different from Radharani.

So by understanding the glories of bhakti, we understand the glories of Radharani. And by getting her mercy, we also become attracted to Krishna and enriched with Krishna consciousness. Thank you very much. Hooray, Krishna. So I think we don’t have any time for questions today.

So I’m very grateful to the opportunity to be here with all of you and to see your enthusiasm and your capacity you know, there is intense bliss. So my classes are intense intellectual exercise. So thank you for being ready for 5 days of workout. My best wishes and prayers that in this month of Kartik, all of you become enriched with Radharani’s blessings and get profuse devotion so that in this Mathuradesh, more and more people can be attracted to Krishna, and all of you can also be attracted more and more to Krishna. Of course, Prabhu in one sense, Prabhu in one sense, is playing the role of a Shiksha guru for all of us because practically every preacher refers to Prabhuji’s talks, analysis, presentation, and this has, empowered our preaching in so many ways.

So, Prabhuji, you are nurturing us in more ways than that you are aware of, you know, and we are very, very fortunate that, we could host, Prabhuji during this visit. Prabhuji’s unique presentation of drawing on the on the screen. So I was also just thinking towards the conclusion that, of course, I don’t have a pen and a tablet. So there is lord Krishna. There are there are his instructions, and following his instructions leads to happiness.

And jiva is here, but the jiva is covered in confusion, you know. Then comes Chaitanya Charan Prabhu, removes the confusion, and we experience we’re able to understand Krishna’s instructions for happiness. We will draw this and send it to you, Prabhu. So, once again And it’s your humility, Prabhuji. So with Prabhu’s permission, we will chant 3 times that may, Krishna, Prabhuji more and more and more so that he is able to keep good health and travel all over the world, to present the philosophy of, Krishna consciousness in a manner that is timeless as well as timely, that it touches the hearts of so many, educated, intelligent people, and inspires all of us to practice and in our own limited way present a, philosophy of Krishna consciousness nicely.

So we’ll chant 3 times. So, Prajna, kindly keep us in your prayers and bless us that we are able to apply, the teachings that you presented to all of us, in our own lives and also be able to serve Srila Prabhupada’s movement as some insignificant instrument, taking inspiration, from you. Hare Krishna. So we wish Prabhuji a safe journey back. Prabhu travels 9 to 10 months every year.

So that’s also a nice example of desire, what Prabhu explained in his talk. Thank you very much, Prabhu ji, for for your inspirational visit and benefiting us in so many ways. Hare Krishna.

The post 5 Six characteristics of bhakti – Last four characteristics appeared first on The Spiritual Scientist.

4 Six characteristics of bhakti – Bhakti-karma relationship QA
→ The Spiritual Scientist

Hare Krishna. Thank you for coming today. And we continue our discussion on the topic of the interaction between karma and bhakti. So we’ll take some questions today, and then after that, we’ll move towards the discussion on the remaining characteristics depending on how the questions go. So at the first two set of questions were about Vaishnavaparad and Vaishnav blessings.

How do they affect our karma? Say, if we commit some offence, even if it is unintentional, see. Then, is it that that adds to our karma? Does that cause suffering? So, first thing to understand, like I said, is that Krishna is on our side.

Krishna is a loving God. Now Krishna as God is merciful. He is not vengeful. Vengeful means it’s like a revengeful. He’s not a person you did this so you had to punish you for this.

And you did this and I’m going to punish you for this. So Krishna is a merciful God. He’s not a vengeful God. And that includes, even when we are dealing with devotees, Krishna cares for everyone. And we could say that if, say, Krishna is at the center, then there are different circles of love around him.

Say, for example, in innermost circle of love, maybe the gopis of Vrindavan. They are the topmost devotees. But then every single soul is loved by Krishna. These circles can keep extending extending till it includes not just all of us, but even people who are in health. In some traditions, the idea is that if you don’t believe in God, God will punish you and send you to health forever.

In the Vedic tradition, the idea is not that God sends us to hell. Actually, God goes with us to hell. That even when somebody goes to hell, Krishna is the Paramatma is there in the heart. Wherever we go. So of so what sends somebody to hell is their own karma.

So the point is Krishna’s love is unfailing. And when we start practicing bhakti it shouldn’t lead to us living in constant fear oh what if I offend this devotee what if I offend that devotee The important thing is that, normally, when there is love See, where there is love, is there fear? No. Actually, there is fear. But the fear is not so much of being punished as it is of displeasing the other person.

You know? So, in the case of law, if I break the law, then the police may if I go above the speed limit, then the police may catch me, the police may fine me, the police may arrest me, police may take away my license. So that fear is there. So, there is a fear of being punished. And especially if we think that person doesn’t care for us, then there may be great fear of punishment.

Now, when there is love, when we love and respect someone and when that person loves and respects us, that loves and cares for us, then there is fear. But the fear is of a different dynamic. It is, I don’t want to hurt this person. I don’t want to displease this person. I don’t want to disappoint this person.

It is not so much what this person will do to me if I do something wrong. As it is what this person will feel if I do something wrong. Now, yes, they may punish us. They may do some disciplinary action. But when there is love, there is careful consideration of actions.

Not so much because of the fear of the punishment. It is more because of the fear of displeasing the other ones. So, the impetus is very different. When there are 2 people, say, there is authority figure. So one fear is, what will they do to me?

If I do this, what will they do to Me? On the other hand, the other fear so here there is, when there is no love. But when there is love, it is how this will affect them. They will feel hurt, they will feel disappointed and this is a very different dynamic. So for us, the fear is also meant to be healthy.

In this case, not wanting to hurt someone whom we care for and who cares for us is meant to inspire us to not do the hurtful activity. So for us, we need to see the whole point of Vaishnavaprad as something wherein out of love for Krishna and out of love for those who love Krishna and those whom Krishna loves, we become more careful about our actions. So there are some extreme situations. So wherein somebody commits some severe offense and then that person may get some disease or that person may get some severe karmic reaction. Those are described in the Vedic tradition.

In the not the Vedic tradition, but in the Bhakti tradition. But those are generally meant to illustrate a particular point. They are not the normal way Krishna operates. Generally, whenever scripture scripture, when it teaches, it teaches quite often through extremes. What do I mean by extremes?

That one of my friends is a novel writer. He’s a published novel writer, and he says that he often takes, inspiration by observing the lives of people around him. And they can get some ideas for the characters that he wants to write about. But, generally, no one person’s life is usually interesting enough to make an interesting character. So most interesting characters are a composite of 3, 4 different people, and the most interesting parts of their lives are taken.

So similarly, so why is that? Normal life is not very interesting. So if we decided to do a 24 hour recording of everything that we did during the day, And the next day we sit down and watch that for for 24 hours that recording. Within 10 minutes we’ll get bored. We want to watch some some part, but 24 hours we’ll want to watch that.

Even if it’s our own life and our own activity. So the thing is that, generally, whenever something is to be made memorable, ordinary events are not memorable. It’s extraordinary. It is the extreme that is memorable. So that’s why if you scripture teaches, we can see negative extremes, positive extremes.

So a negative extreme could be, say, Bharat Maharaj. One small mistake, wherein what happens? He gets attached to a deer, and then he has to take an entire next life from that. But on the other hand, if you look at Ajahn, just one chanting of the holy name of the Lord, and that too incidentally, indirectly he was chanting, addressing his son. Still he’s doing good.

So the point is, scriptures give extreme examples, and the purpose of extreme examples is not to standardize the extreme. It is not to say that this is what is what always happens. It is to emphasize the standard. Now what do I mean by this difference? Emphasize so consider this.

When we need to push you, creating creating itself, it’s what activities are common in karma of losing the mind. Anybody from anywhere can take a bhakti. Not just take a bhakti. They can attain the supreme destination. So in that sense, our past karma does not, interfere with our present capacity to practice mukti.

So, in this sense, you can say, they are completely unrelated. But another way of looking at it is that somebody who has passed positive karma, they are more likely to be exposed to bhakti. That means somebody who has, say, been born in a if not a Brahminical family, but a pious family. They’re more likely to go to a temple. They’re more likely to respect sadhus.

They’re more likely to hear Shastra. And in that sense, past karma can make one more favorable to the practice only. Favorable in the sense of they’re more likely to get the opportunity. But it doesn’t always work like that. Sometimes, some people who have passed positive karma may become proud of that.

And because of that, they may think, you know, I already know these things. Like many people say, Bhagwan kana chawvis gante rudhame chalte ruddhame chalte ruddhame. I am chanting 24 hours the name of Krishna. Chawvis gante ruddhame chalte ruddhame. Is it?

It’s while if something is constantly in the heart, how will it not manifest externally? So it’s that can make one proud. And if it makes one proud, then that can be unfavorable also. Vipra vishadamuriyatadarvindanama padarvindvibukhat shwapajammarishtam. Prahlad in his prayers says that Brahmana might have all the wonderful qualities.

Vishuddha Purna Yudha. There are 12 traditional qualities which are said to glorify a Brahmana. They may have that but if that person is adverse to the Lord, thinks that I don’t need the Lord. I’m so pure already. And contrasted with that, even a no born person, Ashwapacha, will be considered exalted.

So so in that sense so this is with respect to taking of bhakti. Now, when we are practicing Bhakti, can our past karma affect our faith? Well, it depends. Say, if we are going through our life and this is the time when we start Bhakti. So, during our life journey so, now we can say that we have certain karma which we are going to get.

Some positive karma, some negative karma. So now, after we start bhakti also, we might get some positive karma. We might get some negative karma. So, when this comes, how does it affect our devotion? So this is where the primacy of free will comes in.

Normally, we might think that if somebody starts Bhakti, and then after starting bhakti, they, say, at that time, get a positive karma. That means, say, if they have some family issue, it gets resolved. They have some health issue, it gets resolved. Their faith in Krishna may increase. That is possible.

But it’s also possible that they may think, Oh, you know, because I had this problem, so I was practicing Bhakti. Now, the problem is gone and we don’t need to practice Bhakti. Isn’t it? So, it’s like distraction from Bhakti can come because of adversity. Adversity is some problems come in your mind.

It can also come because of prosperity. Both can be distractions. And that’s why, say, for us for some people it may happen that they start practicing bhakti and they face some problems and then that can make them go away from Krishna but that can also make them think that, you know, this problem is so difficult. If I had not been practicing bhakti, I would have been completely crushed by this. Thank God I have this practice of bhakti.

But at least I have some shelter, some strength. Tohuasakshatkar binamakthike kaysa karta inipar. That when we get dangers, we realize that without bhakti, I would have been crushed. So bhakti is bliss. So similarly, for somebody when prosperity comes in their life, now they may think that, oh, you know, now Krishna is because I’m making good choices in my life, Krishna is making my life more comfortable so that I can make good choices more easily.

Say, if somebody has a lot of financial anxiety and they’re still they’re practicing bhavni, the financial anxiety goes away. Then that person will think, okay. Now that anxiety won’t distract me so much, so I can practice Bhakti more. So that can happen. And if it happens, it’s very good.

But it can happen the other way also. Now I don’t have anxiety. Why should I practice Bhakti? So, it’s not that our past karma ever forces a present choice. Our past karma does not determine our present karma.

Our past karma may create certain situations where we may make some choices or where the opportunity to make some choices comes, the tendency to have that choice will be greater. But that does not mean that the past karma so, past karma. Karma in the sense of reaction. Now, how much does the past karma determine our present karma? Present karma in terms of action.

So now, if it were fully determined, so we could look at if we consider, if you say fully, it fully determines. Then basically, what it means is we have no free will at all. Isn’t it? So we have done some things bad in the past and that’s what we are going to keep doing throughout our life. Because that past karma is controlling us completely.

Now, that is wrong. We all have free will. See, if if we were just like some people say we’ll talk about astrology a little later. Some people say that’s, sab kuch Bhagwan ka keel hai. Yeah.

You’ve seen this, you’ve seen this Gita saar? Johua This is a nice thought. You know, I have read the Gita many, many times. I have had friends who have written the Gita. I have read the Gita several hundred times.

But, you know, none of us have ever been able to find any words which says this. So, because the focus of the Gita is not on kya orahay. The focus of the Gita is on kya kar rahe ho. Kya karhe ho. It is not on what is happening, but on what we are doing.

See, Arjuna’s starting question itself is, pruchhamitwam dharmasamudajitaha. Dharma is the right thing to do. Because I am confused about what is the right thing to do and you please guide me about what is the right thing to do. There’s nowhere in the Gita which Krishna says that oh, that you are having to fight against Bhishma Yachaya Yohra. You know, actually, in this world, bad things do happen and to say that everything that happens is good is actually very it can be very dehumanizing for people.

When Sita is being abducted, jata urzan tell her johoraya chaworaya. That would be horrendous. Isn’t it? So, actually, there’s a difference between everything that happens is good and everything that happens is for good. Is good means, intrinsically, automatically it is good.

But is for good. So, is good may not be true because there are bad people and bad people do bad things. Sometimes, even good people can do bad things. So, bad things happen in this life. But is for good means what?

Even when somebody does something bad, Krishna is expert enough to bring something good out of it. So, the point I’m making over here is that for Krishna to bring out something good, we also have to make good choices. Isn’t it? So, it’s not that our past determines our present completely. So one extreme is to say that our past karma fully determines our present karma.

The other is to say, not at all. Now, this is unrealistic because, say, if somebody is extremely poor and they have so no money at all and then the only way they get some food is by robbing. Now, is robbing wrong? Yes, it is wrong. But at the same time, when they do that, it is understandable that can our past situation, our past karma, put us in situations when we do something wrong.

Well, it can. But here, there is a significant difference. I’ll come to that. So, the balance is partly. So, what our past karma does is, it pushes, but it does not it does not forces.

What is the difference between pushing us to do certain actions and forcing us to do certain actions? Pushing means that certain actions may become easy. Say, for example, somebody is very hungry and they they rob some food. That may be necessary. But after that, they become a regular robber and they rob not just food, they start robbing many other things and they start killing people for robbing things.

But that is not something Japa’s Karma made them. That is what they chose. This is a later question about Ajamil. So, you know, how if Ajamil was also a devotee, how did He fall? Most of you know the story of Ajamil?

So Ajamil was a brahmana who had gone out to collect firewood for his, father and while he had gone out he saw, a woman, a prostitute, and a man hugging each other and, doing other things. So he got agitated by that. So now, if we consider the situation carefully, Ajamil had not deliberately gone to some place where such things happen. So, we could say, his seeing that was unfortunate. And you can say, maybe his seeing that sight was a result of some past negative karma.

So, by past karma, he chanced upon that sight. And that was telling me that, whatever he saw that triggered such desires in his mind that he just he tried to control himself, he could not. Now see, when somebody does something wrong so what we are exploring over here is there is wrongdoing. That means the question I’m exploring is whether past karma leads to present karma. That is the question we are discussing.

So whenever some wrongdoing happens see, initially, the wrongdoing can be circumstantial. That means somebody is put in a circumstance and in that circumstance, they do that thing. So maybe he saw that and that created such a desire within him that he he just couldn’t control the desire. Okay. It’s it’s possible.

Maybe he felt it or I have to be with her. Then he went went with her and he fulfilled his desire. Now, we could say, okay, the mind getting agitated is one thing, but indulging in it is quite another thing. Okay. We can say the mind was so agitated that He did that.

But it’s one thing to go and do something one time. But eventually, what He decided was that I want to be with Her constantly. So, he abandoned his parents. He drew away his chaste wife. He gave up his Brahminical duties because if somebody is living like this, who would want that person to be a Brahman who performs priestly duties for them?

So, what happened was, then he had to start robbing and, attacking people, stealing from them. So, we could say, the first sight or even the first fall, that was circumstantial. But rejecting parents, rejecting wife, rejecting job, rejecting society. You know, these cannot be said to be circumstantial. Even by circumstance, some desire comes.

The desire stays for some time. It may be very, very strong and we may succumb at that time. But afterwards, our desire goes down, the intelligence comes back. So by this time, it is an intentional action. It is not a circumstantial action.

So, yes, circumstantially, it can happen for a devotee that sometimes such difficulties come that a devotee is just not able to practice bhakti. A devotee loses faith or gives a practice of bhakti. But once that situation subsides, the devotee will come back to Krishna. And, if the devotee continues on, then that cannot be blamed on past karma. That is the present karma.

That is the present choice. And that is why so, I’ll conclude this particular answer with 2 points. First point is that if somebody who is a respectable person, somebody is a senior devotee and they do something terrible That shouldn’t lead us to immediately condemning them. Oh, you are a hypocrite. You talk and show such big things and now let’s see what you have done.

No. Everybody goes through difficulties in life. And sometimes, even the best of us can be tested and when those tests come, even the worst can come even out of the best. Ideally, it should not but it can happen. And for all of us, we may have experienced that some person is very polite and nice and sweet and sometimes they just snap and they hear.

Now, that’s very different from the way they behave. But, we don’t say, Oh, all the sweetness and niceness are not just a shoe. Rather, what we will consider is, was something going on in their life? Because of which they snapped like that? We will try.

We will give them the benefit of the doubt. The benefit of the doubt. So, if there is if there’s, like, a occasional wrong, then what we need to do is there’s a benefit of the doubt that, okay. I don’t know what is going on. Maybe this person is going through some difficult situations, so let them go.

And similarly for ourselves also, we don’t have to be too hard on ourselves. But then, the question comes as how far? If somebody is repeatedly doing something wrong, so, Ajam is first mistake can be overlooked. But, we all have certain boundaries in our life. No.

And for all of us, say, you know, if we have anger, now maybe our boundary is that okay, I don’t yell at anyone. But maybe we get a little angry, we yell. But then we use swear words. We start speaking foul words, start using dalia. Then, somebody raises their fists.

Then, somebody takes a knife. Then, somebody takes a gun. Now, see, all of us, there are certain things which we will never do no matter how angry we become. Isn’t it? We all have certain boundaries in our life and every society, every culture brings certain boundaries.

And if some boundaries are crossed, then that can be understandable. But, like I said, here, a person rejecting their parents, rejecting their wife, rejecting their society, rejecting their job, this is something which is being knowingly done. It is these boundaries are meant to protect us. So the difference so what when can we know that what is due to past karma and what is due to present karma? See, there are this is a whole big subject, but if something is being repeatedly done, and not only repeatedly done, it is increasingly done.

And the person is doing the same thing and the person is becoming worse and worse at doing it. Then it is present karma. We cannot say it is because of past karma. So now what about so Ajamal’s actions, they were we always have free will. Just because somebody is a devotee does not mean Krishna takes away their free will.

Krishna will give them facility to use the free will nicely, but they have to use that free will eventually. So it is described that Krishna did not forget Ajamal just because he had done so many wrong things. And that’s how eventually a saint came to his house and the saint suggested that you should name your child Narayan. And name the child Narayan. And then, when at his time of his death, he called out that child.

So there was a plan even for him to be delivered. But it took a long, long time, caused a lot of trouble. So past karma does not it can temporarily divert us from bhakti, but it will not permanently drive away. Drive away from permanently drive us away from bhakti. So we can differentiate between fall down and fall away.

The 2 are not the same thing. Fall down means, we are following a particular standard and we are unable to follow the standard. But fall away means, we give up the practice itself. So, fall down may happen because of past karma, But falling away is due to present karma. The 2 are not the same.

So fall down means, okay, you do that. Now, we go to a particular place where no food is available and we have to eat some kind of food which normally we don’t take when we are practicing bhakti. Now, what kind of food that is also important? That, that may be a fall down. But falling away means, even when they have food that is devotionally compatible available, still they keep eating other kinds of food.

So, that is something which is a conscious choice. Somebody might get a job in a particular place where they just don’t have any vegetarian food available. What do you do at that time? When then when Prabhupada wanted devotees to go and preach in Soviet Russia, behind what they call as the iron curtain. So the devotees said, Prabhupada, there.

There is practically no vegetarian food available. So Prabhupada said, Eat meat but preach. Now, the point of that is not that Prabhupada is recommending eat meat. Prabhupada is saying that if that is what is required, you know, we want everybody to be delivered. That a devotee going there A devotee may eat meat occasionally.

But there, there are people who are eating meat regularly and their future is very dark. If a devotee goes with a mood of compassion and helps those people over there, that is a glorious service. But that does not mean that devotees would regularly start eating meat. Obviously not. And that never happened.

So, again, the point is that past karma can temporarily divert us. But not permanently. Now, this related with past karma, the question comes up is about astrology. So, through astrology or through Vastu, it is said that if some difficulties are there in our life, we can do certain practices by which those difficulties will go away. So, yes.

So, generally, whenever like, whenever there is some material problem, now if there is a material problem, we need a material solution to that problem. Say, for example, earlier, right, when the sound system was not working. Now, when the sound system was not working, I said, let’s chant Hare Krishna. We also had to chant Hare Krishna. That is a spiritual activity.

But is that the solution? You can say, it is the ultimate solution, but it is not the immediate solution. Isn’t it? B, if the sound system is not working, the sound system needs to be fixed. So, there is spiritual consciousness that can help us to get the ultimate solution.

And spiritual consciousness can also help us calm down, so that we can find the immediate solution. But, there, if there is a material problem, there’s a material solution required. So, yes, there are spiritual solutions in the sense that spiritual solution uses the calmness and the clarity to find the right material solution. So if I am feeling very if I’m feeling a lot of pain and if I chant Hare Krishna. It is not if there is some disease inside the body, chanting Hare Krishna will not remove the disease.

But, if I have got pain and I start thinking, you know, I should feel a lot of pain, so I take a lot of pain killers. And somebody takes such a heavy dose of pain killer, then that becomes fatal for them. Now, that’s a terrible thing to do. So, okay. I’m having pain.

I mean, it’s a pain killer. But let me go to doctor to find out what is causing so much pain. So, material problems do require material solutions. And, like, when I say material solution, there are multiple level. Yesterday, like, was also revising.

At first, we start from the drushta and then we move toward the drushta. So, if we are facing problems in our life and we have tried the normal reasonable ways for solving the problem and it is not getting solved. They suppose somebody has a disease and they’re taking a medicine and they’ve tried taking various medicines and they’re not working. Then some people may explore. Maybe, is there something astrologically I can find out what I need to do?

Somebody may do this, do that. See, there is, if you see, where should you put it? There is a spiritual level of reality, then there is our present physical level of reality. But apart from that, there is also a subtle level of reality. Now, physical is material, subtle is also material.

So most of modern science focuses on the physical level of reality to find solutions. Oh, okay. You know, if your blood pressure is very high, if your heartbeat is very high. Okay. Take some medication.

Put some chemicals in the body by which the heart will stop beating so fast. Now, that is one way of solving the problem. But, if that person has a lot of stress in their life, then just taking medication to slow the heartbeat is not going to help. Isn’t it? It is okay.

How do you deal with the stress? Maybe if you have too much work to do, share the workload with someone else. Try to manage your lifestyle. That’s also required. So that then subtle domain is something which we understand from our common sense also.

So within the subtle domain, there are many things. Now, when we talk about astrology, it is not that, sometimes it’s like, your Mangal is bad or Shani is bad and that’s why you’re facing problems. So now, it is not that Mangal or Shani is causing those problems. It is that Mangal or Shani being bad means that, those astrological arrangements are indications that because of our past karma, right now, we are going through a negative phase. So the planets the planets are not causes.

The planets are like signs. So, for example, if you are going on a road, and on the road it said, bumpy road ahead. Now, that sign is not making the road bumpy. Isn’t it? That sign is telling us that the road is bumpy.

So, like that, astrology can sometimes give us some indications of what may be wrong. And then, we might want to take the appropriate measures to fix it. But, the problem with that is 3 fold. First is, you know, astrology itself is complex. It is it is not a very precise way of looking at things.

It’s more interpretive than predictive. Like, if we consider weather forecast, see, as to a horoscope is basically meant to be like a weather forecast. But the factors are actually far more complicated and far more subtle. Like the weather forecast may say, today morning it is going to rain. And, we go, there is no rain at all.

So even with the most sophisticated devices, weather forecast may not be always accurate. So like that, it is complex and it is primarily meant to be interpretive. It is it is interpretive. Interpretation that you made is not predictive. Although, most people use it for prediction, the predictive aspect is very is only one part of astrology.

So first of all, it is complex. Secondly, it depends on the competence of the astrologer. That, how competitive is astrologer to read and understand the parameters. And, like, if you go to 10 different astrologers, 10 different then, 10 people may send 10 different things. And, like, how many astrologers are there in this world?

Well, there are as many astrologers as there are options for people. The whatever you want to do, if some 2 people want to get married. 1 astrologer will say, no. No. Yours is not compatible.

2nd astrologer will say, you’re not compatible. You can keep going to astrologer till they find when astrologer will say, you can get married. 2 people want to get separated. Most astrologers said, no, no, you should not separate. But they can keep finding an astrologer till one astrologer says, hey, you should get separated immediately.

So, what happens is, the biggest danger in astrology is the outsourcing of decision making. That should never happen. See, astrology, if it should be a resource, not something which we outsource. What do I mean by resource and outsource? Outsource means, you know, you take the decision for me.

Whatever you tell, I will do. No. Astrology, we can use it as one resource for decision making. Ultimately, it is our responsibility. It is our decision to make.

Like, say, the weather forecast may say, there is a big storm out there. But, say, if our child is in school and child is alone. So, no matter how storm is there, I want to go out there. This is important for me. Now, if we’re just going for some casual shopping which cannot be done later, we say, I don’t want to go now.

So, the weather forecast does not take our decisions. It is one input that we take based on which we make a decision. For us, when we decide whether to go out or not, there are other parameters in our life. So, the big danger in astrology is that people who start consulting astrology, they outsource the decisions to astrology. And then, that actually paralyzes their capacity to make decisions.

See, even when Krishna is with Arjuna look. Krishna does not expect Arjuna to outsource his decision making capacity. See, what happens is, that if you consider, Arjuna says karishya vachnam tawa. But it is not that in the subsequent Kurukshetra war, Arjuna is constantly turning to Krishna. Should I do this?

Should I shoot this arrow? Should I shoot this arrow? Should I shoot this arrow? No. Arjuna is his own person making his decisions.

Major decisions he consults Krishna. And later on, if we see when Ashwatthama does something terrible and Ashwatthama is to be punished. So, Bhima has the opinion, we should kill him. Yudhishma has the opinion, we should not kill him. And, Arjuna has to make a decision.

Krishna is right next to Arjuna, but Krishna does not give the decision to Arjuna. It is Arjuna who uses his buddhi and he makes a decision that Krishna is pleased with. So, actually, the whole purpose of the Bhagavad Gita is to make us better at making decisions. It is not we shouldn’t outsource our decision making even to God than what to speak of to an astrologer. So that is the big danger in astrology.

So, in the chain of causes, to conclude this answer, the same principle applies to astrologer and also to Vastu. And there could be many other things. There are some siddhava and this and that and people pray to that and so there is much in the universe that we can’t understand. And it is possible that for some people doing something may solve their problems. But the thing is that it is when we are facing a problem.

So there is a cause. There is an cause. There’s something we can understand, something which you can’t understand. So it is for us to use our intelligence to evaluate. Okay?

What is causing this and what can I do about this? So, based on that, if we want to consider astrology as one resource, then that is up to us. It is. I know many devotees, especially with astrology in marrying. So, I know one devotee, A very, very sincere, dedicated devotee.

His daughter got married and his dad astrologer said 2, 3 astrologers said that this is such a compatible match. He says like, it’s like once in a 100 years that a astrologer gets to see so much compatibility. And what happened is after 6 months, they just couldn’t live together. They tried everything and they just couldn’t. The marriage just broke down.

Now, I am not saying that astrologers are bad. But the fact is, life is complicated. And we can’t outsource the human beings into astrologers. And there are other cases where astrologers said that, you know, if these 2 get married, the husband will die. They still got married and both of them are alive and healthy.

So, I am not saying reject astrology. All that I am saying is, don’t outsource decision making to astrology. Now, this for example, getting married is a complex. It’s a it’s a one of the biggest decision we make in our lives. So, we could if some people want, they can take that as one input, But don’t let that become the sole basis of the decision making.

Don’t outsource the decision making there. So if we have children, if we want to know, okay, what is the broad nature of my child? That, okay. Now, what are the what are the characteristics? What are the likely interests?

You know, if this child has this particular planet higher, then more likely to be artistic, more likely to be linguistic, more likely to be mathematically interested or whatever. So, that some understanding we can get. But that does not mean if astrologist says, okay. Your child will be artistic. Or a child has no interest in art before the child to practice art.

No. Take that as one resource. Don’t make it the sole source of artistry in making. Okay? So, I think we already gone over time.

Shruti? There’s one last question. Should we take that off? Okay. So there’s a question about when we practice bhakti, what happens to the subtle body?

How can we dissolve the subtle body? So basically, the soul is there. Around the soul is a subtle body. Around that is the gross body. So, for us, when we die, the subtle body goes with the soul.

Here, in the question it is said, the subtle body carries the soul. I don’t think subtle body carries the soul. It is like, the subtle body is basically our mind. Mind endless ego. So, imagine, somebody is watching TV and they are so caught in watching some program on TV that a thief comes in their home.

They don’t even notice the thief. And a thief comes and picks up the TV. And the thief is taking away the TV and the person follows and keeps watching the TV. So, for the Yamadutas, they cannot actually touch the soul. The soul is.

So the when the yam the yam that it actually catches the subtle body. And the subtle body is pulled. And the soul is so attached to subtle body, subtle body is like the TV. And the soul is like the person watching the TV. So there, Yamaduttas catch the subtle body, they take the subtle body and the soul goes with it.

So our attachment to our subtle body is far greater than our attachment to our gross body also. But, the subtle body, let’s subtle body has many things, but for simplicity, let’s consider it’s the mind. So the mind is a programmed machine. But thankfully for it is programmed, it is also programmable. Programmable means that we can change the samskaras in the mind.

So, when we practice bhakti repeatedly, what happens by that? 2 things. First is that so, bhakti, it changes our mind. What does that mean? The conditioning, the programming changes.

Say, for example, for somebody, initially, whenever I am stressed, I want to watch TV. Okay. That’s my go to way of coping with stress. But, if we come to kirtan, we participate in kirtan regularly, then, slowly, that samskar is created. So, whenever I feel stressed, let me hear some kirtan.

Let me sing some kirtan. So, what has happened is, the mind has changed. Initially, as soon as stress is there, something from within the mind says, come on. Watch something. We go on social media.

Do this. Do that. But then, with habit, abhyasa and vairagya. So the urge to watch TV comes. Vairagya.

Abhyasa. Keep keep doing. Keep hearing kirtan. Gradually, the mind will change. So, that is change our mind is one thing.

The second is it changes our relationship with our mind. That means, initially when we are very attached, we identify very strongly with the mind. But then, changes our relationship with our mind means, we start understanding, I am not my mind. My mind is a part of me and it is different from me. So what happens?

When we change our mind by that, we start making better choices. But, as we change our relationship with our mind, we become more ready to let go of the mind itself. So, going back to the TV example, say, initially, somebody is very attached to the TV. But then, you know, maybe, somebody can change the programming in the TV so that, you know, we don’t get all kind of nasty obscene channels. We get only good channels.

So, that is the first change. So, although I am still watching the TV, but my TV itself is giving me good options. But after that, so we change our TV and then we change our relationship with our TV. Okay. Every time when I am bored, I don’t have to watch TV.

I can do other things also. So, initially, we let go of the mind’s wrong options, mind’s wrong suggestions, mind’s bad suggestions. But eventually, we let go of the mind itself. So first, when the TV gives us unhealthy options, we say no, I look only at healthy options. Good thing only.

But eventually, there’s no need for the TV only. So, when these two things happen, 1st and second, this is the stage where we become ready for the spiritual world. When we are ready to get to let go of the mind itself. So, when the soul no longer desires to enjoy even the good things in this world, that’s when we become ready to go to the spiritual world. And then, as long as we are in the world, we will lead the mind.

Even a pure devotee has the mind. Just as a pure devotee has a physical body, they also have a subtle mind. But just as the physical body is being used for Krishna’s service, the subtle mind is being used for Krishna’s service. And the physical body is left at the time of death, but the subtle body is left when the soul goes through the material existence and it goes through the various layers in material existence. So when the soul goes through the Brahmana, in the Brahmana, there is the Earth layer.

There is the water layer. Like that, the mind layer is there. So our mind our individual mind gets merged with the subtle mind. Our individual intelligence gets merged with the individual ego. Our individual our individual intelligence gets merged with the individual intelligence, with the universal intelligence.

So, it’s like, the soul is here and in the universe there are many different layers. The Brahmananda has many different layers. So if this is the layer of the mind, you can say this is the universal layer of the mind. And as we are going through here, so here we may have the layer of the mind, but when we come here, this layer of the mind gets merged. And the soul goes free to the spiritual world.

That’s how we dissolve the subtle body. So thank you very much for your very thoughtful questions. Hooray, Krishna. So tomorrow, I’ll cover the last four characteristics of Bhakti, and then we’ll conclude this series.

The post 4 Six characteristics of bhakti – Bhakti-karma relationship QA appeared first on The Spiritual Scientist.

3 Six characteristics of bhakti – How bhakti removes distress & brings auspiciousness
→ The Spiritual Scientist

Okay. Hare Krishna. Will continue our discussion, on the characteristics of pure devotional service. But within this, we’ll be focusing more on the principle of karma. And in that sense, this will be, you could say almost like a stand alone class.

So those of you not attended the previous class can also understand this. Although we’ll draw some points from the previous classes. So, I’ll talk about 3 broad things today. First is, what is karma? Then second is, the relationship between karma and suffering and distress, the problems that we face in our life.

And the third will be the relationship of bhakti with karma and suffering. So this is, subject, this topic is, in one sense, both abstract. Abstract in the sense it’s a conceptual subject. Karma, it’s a concept. Krishna says it’s It’s not so easy to understand.

At the same time, it is a very immediate subject for us. In the sense that it is something which affects us. We all face different challenges in our life, and we all need resources for dealing with those challenges. And how much will our bhakti help us in that? How much should we even expect our bhakti to help us in this?

These are questions that naturally come up within us. So, let’s start with first, understanding the principle of karma. Now, at a basic level, karma means that whenever there is an action, there will be a result of that action. That’s the basic principle of karma, and this does not require any complex philosophy to understand. It is both natural occurrence in the sense that this is how we see things happen.

That if I put my hand close to fire, I feel heat. If I eat cold food, then I get some cold. So the idea that actions produce results, this is just a constant natural occurrence. If, say, a child comes back from school and the child has got a black eye and a broken nose. You say, what happened?

The child says nothing happened. No. Not nothing happened. You just if the effect is there, some cause must be there. So it’s a natural occurrence.

Not only is it a natural occurrence, it is also the basis of science. There will be no science possible if there would not be some connection. Now, science does not use the word and result, it uses the word cause and effect. So the idea is that when Newton saw an apple falling, what made this apple fall? So there would be no science possible if there would not be any correlation between cause and effect.

And it is also an aspect of human training. As parents, when we train our children or in a office when there’s a new employee, if you do something proper, you get more results. Say, if a player is selected for a sports team. If they perform well, then their place becomes more secure. They are maybe promoted to a higher round, maybe higher level team.

So we train people also that way. That if you do the right thing, you will get better results. If you do wrong things, then even the present resources that you have may be taken away from you. So in this sense, this this basic aspect of karma does not require any philosophy to understand. It is just universal.

However, the problem comes because of exceptions or seeming exceptions. Exceptions means there are times when there are actions, but there are no results. Or there are times when there are certain situations that come in our lives when we don’t seem to deserve them. And we don’t seem to have done anything to get those kind of situations. So this is where things become complicated.

So to so so if we are thinking of karma simply as action leads to reaction, then there is no need for Krishna to say The way karma works is very complicated. It is It’s not so easy to understand. The problem comes because it is not just a one to 1 correlation all the time. What do you mean by that? See, we all may remember times when we worked a lot, but we did not get a commensurate result.

Proportionate result. You know, maybe we we studied a lot for an exam, and the marks that we got were very poor. Or maybe we worked very hard for a project, and somebody else gets the recognition. Somebody else gets the reward. And our role is downplayed.

So it happens that, say, we may put in an input of 100 and we may get an output of 10. And this feels extremely unfair. There are some people, now we do so much for them. We do one thing, second thing, third thing, we try to please them. And at the end of it, they don’t they barely acknowledge what we have done for them.

Sometimes, it may not even be 10. It may be minus 10. Like, we do a 100 things for them and they only criticize us for the 101st thing that we did not do. So, such things can seem very unfair for us. And yes, at one level, it is unfair.

However, if we are honest with ourselves, we can also think of times when we did something worth 10, but we got result worth 100. Maybe sometimes we prepare very little for an exam, but what we studied comes in the exam and we do well. Or sometimes we just join a team and we do a little work in the team, but the team does some very impressive project and we also get the credit for that. Like, say, I think in the 2011 World Cup, which we had, there were India won the World Cup. There was one player, he didn’t play a single match.

All the time, he was in the reserve, but still his picture comes in the World Cup winning team. So what happens is, sometimes we may not do anything, but still we may get the credit. So you could say, life is unfair, but you could almost say it is fairly unfair. That means that sometimes it is unfair in a negative sense, but sometimes it is disproportionate where we get more than what we deserve. Like even our relationships, you know, some people, they are just so kind and helpful to us.

Although we don’t pay much attention to them, we all can think of people who, at least some people in our lives, who went out of their way to be kind and helpful to us. So, in that sense, life works both ways. So why does this happen? Because when we talk about action and result, it is not necessary that the result will come only from the present action. Sometimes it may happen that there may be a minus 90 coming from the past.

Something negative comes from the past because of which, we have put in a lot of effort but the result that we get is very less. In contrast, sometimes it may happen that we may have a plus 90 from the past. And that’s why the result we get may be much more than what we deserve based on what we have done immediately. Now this idea of past actions contributing to present results is not, very unfamiliar or unreasonable idea. So if 2 players or 2 people pick up a instrument, maybe a drum or a buddanga, and they start playing, One of them is playing for the first time.

Another has put a 100 hours of practice in it. Now both of them start playing, and when the so the present action is same. Both of them may be trying to put in the same effort, same concentration. They’re putting in effort attentively. But for the first person, for the second person, when they play mardanga, will say more.

Or the first person will say no more. The first person may say, you know, yeah, it is difficult. And, people may say, yeah, it is difficult to hear. So what has happened is why the present action is the same, but the result is different because there have been past actions. So the idea of past actions contributing to the present results that we get, it is not so unfamiliar.

Even in relationships. If I am polite and friendly with someone, I would expect that person to be polite and friendly with me. But if I am polite right now, but if I have been rude a 100 times in the past, then although I am polite right now, that person may still be cold with me. So it is that our past actions that also contribute to the present results. So if I have been, say, cold 10 times in the past with that person, then I may have to work that much more.

So there is a negative of 90 coming from the past, and I will have to clear the negative. Only then I will start getting something positive here. So the idea of past actions determining present results is not something entirely unfamiliar. So the the only key philosophical point that comes over here is how much past the actions can go. So this is where the concept of soul and reincarnation helps us understand that there are actions that may come from the past also.

And they may contribute to what we get in our present situations. So, if we consider the start if we consider this is our life lifetime, Then, add the starting point in our life, we get, so we can say that we carry some past karma reservoir, which is there for us over this life. And we get a big installment of that at our birth? Say, the kind of family we are born in, the country we are born in, maybe the kind of economic situation that is there in the family or the country where we are born in, The kind of genetics we have, which may determine our IQ and our at least a significant level of our abilities, even our complexion. So that is something which we get at the time of our birth.

Or somewhere around that. So, again, this initial installment of karma can also be both a combination of positive and negative. And often, we may focus on the negative. Oh, you know, I did not get this, or this happened to me, or things went around like this. I was born in a place which was poor or I was born in a place where there are not so many opportunities for this or that.

Somehow, our mind tends to remember the way life has treated us worse than what we deserve. But there are times when life has treated us better than what we deserve also. And we don’t tend to remember that unless we make a conscious effort to do that. So you may notice that I need crutches for walking. So when I was 1, I had polio.

Basically, my parents, my mother, my father is in a traveling job. My mother took me to the local doctor to give some polio vaccine. So we were living in a small town in Maharashtra, and she was told that we should get this vaccine. And polio has more or less been eliminated now. The polio vaccine is fairly, fairly effective.

But somehow, because it was a fairly small town, so there, the clinic was not very competent. And the fridge in which they had kept the vaccine, the power supply from that had got somehow cut off. So the germs reproduced much more. And in the vaccine sorry. So the vaccine, when it was given to me, instead of preventing polio, the dosage was so high that it ended up causing polio.

So I was just walking normally, and one day I fell down, and I could no longer walk after that. So now, of course, I don’t remember all this. Later my my parents told me about it. But my one of my first memories of this is when I was probably around 2a half, 3 or something like that. So some distant relative had come to our home and, she was consoling my mother saying that it’s so sad that your son got polio.

And I remember my mother speaking in a very clear, confident voice. He says, whatever he lacks physically, God will provide him intellectually. Now I don’t know at the age of 2a half, 3 what my mother saw in me and why she spoke that. And she passed away soon, so I didn’t get to ask her about it. But the thing was that somehow it stayed in me.

And then as I grew up, I couldn’t play outdoor sport like other kids could play. But when we started studying, I started noticing that, you know, I could understand things much faster. I could remember things better. I could speak things more clearly. And then somehow it struck me, okay, that, you know, I didn’t, I don’t know whether it’s now I’m speaking it consciously.

And I don’t know when that became, like, crystallized as a thought in my consciousness. But somehow it came in the background that, oh, yeah. I I didn’t do anything by which I deserve to need support for walking. But at the same time, I haven’t done anything to have a better memory and a better intelligence than others. So from the starting point, yes, life may treat us negatively in some way, but life also treats us positively in some ways.

So the point here is that karma can work in both ways. And the the key principle in understanding karma is it is a very positive emphasis. The emphasis in understanding karma, like when Krishna tells Arjuna that you should do your karma. Many places he talks about this. His emphasis is Arjuna has to face a terrible situation.

He trained so that he could fight against enemies. He trained in archery, but now he has to fight against Bhishma and Drona. Say, what did I do to deserve this? No. I don’t want to fight against them.

It’s like, say, somebody trains in the Indian army and then there is some conflict and you have to fight against your own commander or your own boss. It’s a terrible thing. So basically, the emphasis in karma is that our actions always matter. At what we do, it always matters. Even when they don’t seem to matter.

Sometimes, you know, we may be very being very kind and polite with someone and still that person continues to be rude and unreasonable with us. See, then what is the views of being kind and polite with this person? And let me also become rude. Now how exactly to deal with the unreasonable or rude people, that’s a different issue. But the point is our kindness is not going waste.

What we do matters. But sometimes if we are going through some phase of negative karma, then the results may not manifest immediately. So I am doing something positive but because of the negative phase of that karma, from the past negative karma, I may not get the results. But we should not become discouraged and think, what is the use of doing anything? Our actions always matter.

And the whole purpose of the Bhagavad Gita is, therefore, choose your actions wisely. That if my actions matter, then let me choose the actions that will matter the most. Somebody may say, I study and I still don’t get good marks in my exams. So better let me not study. I just spend all my time watching TV.

Well, maybe that is the way in which we are wasting our time now. So okay. I may decide, okay, if I can’t study in this particular area, maybe I should study in that area. That we can choose and decide. So our actions always matter.

Now to take this forward, many times when we get some let’s focus on that positive and we’ll talk about the negative also. Negative means see when we positive means when we get some success in our life. So that success is not just the result of our present income. So we may say, you know, I got this job. And so now all of you are here where, you know, you probably have more financial security than people who work in India.

And you come here in that if you say, okay. I worked hard. I was I’m competent in my job. I’m hardworking. That may all be true.

But There were many other people who are just as competent and hardworking. But you see, I got a lucky break. Or I got this thing, this thing clicked, or that thing clicked. So what is that? That what we call as a lucky break is actually some past karma working positively for us.

So basically, whenever there is success, most often, success is a result of present karma plus past karma. Now the exact role, that may vary. For some people, say somebody is extraordinarily talented in particular field. Now some students may just have, like, an extraordinary memory. Sometimes some, you know, on YouTube, we have this India’s Got Talent or Britain has Got Talent.

There are kids, 3, 4, 5 year old. They’re just so phenomenal at music. Or they’re so phenomenal at some field. For some people, the past karma may contribute 90%, and the present karma may only contribute 10%. For some people, it may be the present maybe 90% and the past maybe 10%.

But the point is, past and present both contribute to the results. So now, what applies to the positive also applies to the negative. When we face problems in life. So sometimes the problems may be because of our present actions. And sometimes the problems may be because of past actions.

Say suppose somebody doesn’t very carefully think before investing money somewhere, and there it’s a it’s a bad investment, they lose money. Then you could say that is another bad decision by me right now. So that’s largely because of present actions. But I know one devoted friend in America. You know, he was working in a software company, and he decided to become entrepreneur.

He started his own small business, and he started it just before COVID. And because of the COVID lockdown, he lost all the money. He had invested in buying property. He had to pay taxes. He had got commodities.

So now, you could say, was that a bad decision? Well, how much can you say it’s a bad decision? Who could have foreseen a pandemic which would cause a global lockdown? So here, in this case, that particular financial difficulty that he faced it was largely a result of past karma. So basically, the situations that we face at present, they are in general due to an unpredictable combination of present and past karma.

So how much the present karma might be contributing? How much the past karma might be contributing? It’s difficult for us to understand. So let’s consider four possibilities. You know, that there is present karma and there is past karma.

Now, the present karma can be positive in the sense of being good. And it can be negative in the sense of being bad. And similarly, the past karma can be positive or the past karma can be negative. Now what does this mean? Say, for example, suppose there is a particular bank in a city, and a huge amount of cash has come in that bank.

And say somehow that news doesn’t remain secret but goes out. And now 10 thieves decide to rob that bank. Now 10 of them may plan to rob the bank, but only one of them is successful. So why is one of them successful and others are not successful? So their success, that one person’s success is because of some past good karma.

So, you know, you need good karma to even do bad karma successfully. So now Hitler is considered to be one of the best orators of the last century. He’s a terrible person. By his past karma, he had, by his past good karma, he had great oratory capacity. He had some past positive karma by which he was meant to become a leader.

But then, by his present negative karma, he ended up becoming a terrible misleader. There have been many, many, terrible people in the world, and there have been many people who slaughtered people. Genghis Khan, when he conquered Europe, and he’s supposed to have annihilated almost 1 fourth of the population of Europe. So there but he was traveling across many countries, and he killed people. But Hitler and the Holocaust, which happened, at the first time in the history of the world, that industrial efficiency was brought to mass slaughter.

Killing people, you know, if you kill people, you have to bury people or you have to burn people. You have to do something. At here, just put them in gas chambers. It’s a very efficient way of killing people. It’s brutal.

But the point is that even for somebody to get success in doing bad karma, they may need some positive karma from the past. So if you consider among these 4 situations or 4 quadrants, now the best is where a person’s past karma is positive and the present karma is positive. That means they work they work for some good cause. And when they work for some good cause, they get not just some good result, but some great results by that. So somebody may be a researcher, and they develop some medicine which cures some terrible disease.

Or somebody makes some song which is, you know, maybe their musical ability, which inspires a lot of people with some patriotic sentiments or devotional sentiments or whatever. So there are great poets who have composed some great compositions. So the best is where we have positive karma from the past and negative karma. A positive past karma and positive present karma. Now the worst situation Is this the worst?

Not really. See if the person has negative karma from the present, then they’re going to do bad things. But if they have negative karma from the past, their bad things will not lead to much bad results. Because, say, like, somebody may want to become a terrorist and blow up, blow up a big building. But something goes wrong and the bomb blows up before they reach the building, and they only blow up.

Nothing else happens. So what happens is it is less harmful. They may try to do some bad actions, but the bad actions may not have much results. So many people many bad people try to do bad things. It’s not that every bad thing that they do succeeds.

So actually, where the past karma is positive and the present karma is negative, this is the most dangerous thing. That means the person is doing bad things now, but that person has a stockpile of past positive karma. So they may be able to do bad things. Now their actions will lead to results, but they may not lead to results right now. So somebody might be, like, a terrible ruler or dictator.

And they have 1,000 units of positive past karma. So then they will use all that to hold on to their power and to keep doing bad things. They will get the results, but they may not get much results in this lifetime at all. So, actually, this is the deadliest combination. Now if the present karma is positive and the past karma is negative.

Now this is difficult, but it is not necessarily bad. That I’m doing some good things right now, but I don’t get the results. I don’t get the recognition. I don’t get the rewards. So this is this is where actually we need to understand what is happening and to pass through this phase.

Okay. So if you consider the Pandavas, the Pandavas were virtues for a long time. And yet, one after another, their father passed away. And then they were they were persecuted by the Kauravas in so many different ways. Now, of course, we can say they are pure devotees and karma doesn’t apply to them.

But we can use this as an ethical framework for understanding. So we understand that they had to go through a lot of negative phases. And then finally, when the negative phase ended, then they got the positive phase. So here, when we are going through a phase of difficulties. So is the child crying because of present karma or past karma?

So it is the child’s present karma, the speaker’s past karma. But but suppose, you know, say suppose some child is crying, and then at that time, the speaker starts yelling or screaming at that person. Now what is going to happen now is the child crying is a disturbance. But if the speaker yells and screams, then at the end of the class, the audience is going to remember how the speaker behaved. Isn’t it?

The child cry will be forgotten. So what happens is our present karma can sometimes make the problem far worse. Isn’t it? So the idea is that even when certain situations come in our life, our present karma does make a difference even when it doesn’t seem to make a difference. So now this what I mentioned the past karma stockpile that we have, If we consider our lifetime, then we all said we said destiny is fixed.

So this is we all have a certain stockpile of karma from the past that is going to come to us. And because that stockpile is fixed. But while that stockpile may be fixed, how it is going to come in our life is not necessarily fixed. Say, what do I mean by that? Say, to some extent, at the start of our life, we get some major installment of that karma.

And then, say maybe during the course of a lifetime, somebody lose 60, 70, 80 years, maybe they are meant to face 4 big problems. Maybe they get at one they get some terrible disease. Maybe some loud one passes away. Maybe in their business, somebody betrays them. Somebody cheats them.

And maybe they meet with some accident. So, of course, each of these can be a very difficult situation to pass through. But imagine if all 4 of these happen simultaneously. You know? That would be almost unbearable, isn’t it?

So our past karma might be fixed, and that may come upon us. But that does not mean that our present karma does not matter. So I’ll explain in 2 different ways how our present karma matters. Say, suppose somebody is going to be cheated in the business, and because of that cheating, they’re going to lose a lot of money. It’s a terrible thing to happen.

But suppose that person during the course of their life, you could be cheated in the business, you could be cheated in the family relationship, cheated whatever way. But before that, during the course of that life, if that person has been polite, kind, helpful, now maybe the cheater will will use that to exploit them even more. But if they have been polite, kind, helpful with people in general, then when they are cheated, others will be ready to help them. No. You’re a good person.

This bad thing happened to you. But on the other hand, if, say by karma, by past karma, they are meant to be cheated. But if in this life, they are rude, they are cunning, you know, they are they just use and throw people, then when one person cheats them, the way they have acted in this life will mean that nobody else will come to help them. So we may not be able to change the fact that we might get cheated. But how we are able to deal with that cheating?

Now that will be determined by our present actions. So sometimes when you say that destiny is fixed. No. Yes. What happens sometimes when we take from shastra one statement and we absolutize that statement without considering other statements.

So for example, it is said that in our destiny, our happiness and distress are fixed. Yeah. So I just said in the scripture, So a statement like that in 7th canto, the first canto. Now what does this mean practically? Does it mean that, say, we if by destiny, when we say by destiny is fixed, and by that, by destiny, our happiness and our distress are fixed.

So if we say this is one statement, and there is truth to the statement. But along with that, scripture itself tells us So when we indulge in sensual pleasures indiscriminately, excessively, we suffer. So can if say by our destiny, our happiness and distress are fixed. Can we increase our distress in this life? What do you think?

Can we increase our distress? No. Of course, we can. Isn’t it? See, if somebody starts taking alcohol and they become alcoholic.

Then that is in in the morning, I talk about suffering that is avoidable and suffering that is unavoidable. So that if somebody is drinking, and then they get some disease. No. That is not due to the past karma, isn’t it? So, say, if on a cold night, somebody takes a dozen ice creams, and they enjoy the taste at that time.

But the next morning, their throat is terrible. In the previous night, they were saying, I scream. And now they say, I scream. Now they scream in pain. Now if they have a terrible throat, is it because of past karma?

Yes. But it is past night’s karma, not past life’s karma. So the thing is that our present actions do matter. So our present actions, they do matter in the sense that just as we can increase the distress that will come because of our present actions, similarly, from our present actions, we can also increase to some degree the happiness. So our present actions also matter.

Gita says for them, if you live in we’ll experience greater happiness. So let’s consider an example of let’s suppose because of the past karma, somebody is meant to get some terrible disease. Now they’re they’re meant to get some cancer. Cancer is probably an example of a disease for which we don’t know the cause practically. Like, iatrogenic diseases.

We don’t know what exactly is the cause. So suppose somebody is meant to get cancer. Now, if in this life, they have generally tried to live healthy, eat good food, do some regular exercise, have regulated habits, then one way of looking at it is, what is the use of living healthy? Still got cancer. Life is so unfair.

But another way of looking at it could be that because this person lived healthy, their chances of recovering are greater because of that. On the other hand, if somebody has always been eating a lot of unhealthy food, somebody has always been very unregulated in their whole life, and they get cancer, then their chances of recovering might be very less. So the point I’m making is our present actions do matter. So in general, when we are going through difficulties, can we know whether that difficulty has come because of present karma or past karma? What do you think?

Well, I mean, I’m I’m amazed by your confidence. So we can say we can know to some extent, isn’t it? See. Yeah. Exactly.

So we can analyze. We can observe that, okay, if this person is very upset with me, you know, have I done something to upset that person? Maybe I am not aware of it. I was in UK. I was staying at 1 devotee’s home.

And he told me that tomorrow is my wife’s wedding anniversary. I said, what do you mean your wife’s? They’re not your wedding anniversary. So he said, I don’t believe in all these things. I said, that was like a red signal for me.

And then after that, now so now he had been a devotee who started practicing bhakti. And his wife had been introduced to bhakti through him. So then he was telling me that, actually, you know, my wife doesn’t support me in my bhakti. She doesn’t understand what I’m doing. And he said, you know, I think, it is because of some past bad karma that I’ve got such a disagreeable wife.

I said wait a minute. Wait a minute. Then I was staying at their home so I was taking lunch and I started talking with Mataji also. She is very intelligent and very reasonable. And she started telling that many things which, you know, it is it is natural to for a husband to take certain responsibility to do certain things.

And this devotee, he was being a bit too transcendental. And his wife was upset because of that. So now I told him, Prabhu, it’s best when we face problems never to jump to past karma right in the beginning. So if we are having problems, first look at, is there something I might be doing because of which this is happening? Now, it’s very rare, it’s possible, but it’s very rare that a problem comes because of 100% past karma only.

That I have done absolutely nothing and still this person is against me. It is possible. You know, there is sometimes racial prejudice, religious prejudice, regional biases. So, you know, you just belong to this community. This community is a community of cheaters or selfish people or that people.

And just because we belong to that community, we are labeled in that way. So that can happen. But generally speaking, it is best when some we are having facing some problems to think how I may have contributed to this problem. And is there something I can do to deal with it? To fix it?

To improve the situations? So so basically, when we face difficulties, it is best to start with, like, minimal assumptions. Minimal assumption means that, say, whenever we face problems, start with the most logical explanation first. Say if I’m speaking right now, and suddenly you’re not able to hear what I speak. The first explanation could be that, okay, that maybe this mic is not working.

Yeah. Other explanation could be maybe the sound system itself has collapsed. Other explanation could be that that, you know, the whole audience, at one moment, everybody has become deaf. Oh, so some mysterious virus has come here and made everybody deaf. Another explanation could be that I have got some attack of some disease by which I’m moving my mouth, but my nose, the sound is coming.

Now if somebody starts now are these possible? Maybe, you know, hey, this the mic work not working. The sound system collapsing. They’re possible. But generally, what happens is a sign of intelligence.

Intelligence means in in sankhya, sorry in in Nyaya, Nyaya is Vedic logic. So in Nyaya it is said, whenever we are looking for an explanation, when we are looking for explanations, it is best to start with what is drushta, and then go towards what is drushta. Drushta means what? Visible. So start with more visible or immediate causes.

So an action can have a range when particular situation comes in our life, it can have a range of causes. But best to start with the immediate cause. And when the immediate cause doesn’t work, then move towards a more remote cause. So my most immediate cause could be, did I accidentally turn off the power switch of this? Our next immediate cause could be, has the battery got become discharged on this?

A third could be, maybe this mic has become spoiled. If right in the beginning I say, oh, it’s not able to speak to you? Some terrorists have attacked and the power supply has been destroyed because of that. They say, why are you panicking? Why are you going towards such such explanations?

So karma, the philosophy of karma is not meant to reject the immediate explanation. It is meant to explain situations when the immediate explanations don’t work. So immediate explanations are also valid, but they may not always be valid. So that’s why I start from the and move towards the. Sorry.

Start from the and move toward the. So till now I have spoken about karma. Now let’s move towards bhakti. So so the basic point here is that our actions do matter. There is past karma, but how much the past karma matters in a particular situation?

It’s difficult to know. It is possible that a particular problem has come because of past karma. But let’s not assume that right in the beginning. So now, when we practice bhakti, so there is our, when we talk about karma, how is karma affected by bhakti? So that is the question that we’ll discuss.

And this is a big question, but again, as I it’s not that we have, an answer that is because these concepts themselves are complex and subtle, the answers are also subtle. But we can try to understand broad principles. Now as I said, karma itself can be past and present. So quite often, we tend to focus on the past karma. And how much of my past karma will Krishna remove?

But, you know, first of all the problem with this is, the past karma is itself unknown to us. So we may have a 1000 units of past karma, and Krishna may remove 900 and only a 100 may remain. But 100 will still remain. Now for us, a hundred still may seem very bad. And we say, why this happening?

This shouldn’t have happened to me. It may be that just before we came to bhakti, we were going through a phase of good karma. And then when we start practicing bhakti, we start going through a phase of bad karma. And they said, okay. I started chanting.

Hare Krishna, my problem my life started increasing. So is Krishna causing these problems to me? No. Not at all. So it’s like, when we go to the whole dimension of past karma, first of all, we don’t know how much is the past karma.

And we don’t know or we can’t know how much that is going to be removed. Mhmm. So Krishna does say, I’ll remove. But it is said, He says, but the is This is the second sarva. There is the first sarva also.

So in one sense, Krishna is reciprocal. To the extent we become pure devotees, to that extent, the karma influence may go away. But this, because the past karma is unknown, it’s best to tolerate it. Whatever it comes, So it’s not that Krishna is not helping us, But it’s just that, how Krishna is helping us, we don’t know. Suppose, you know, we inherited some debt because suddenly, say, our parents or somebody in their family passed away.

Now that if we don’t know how much debt is there, and because that person is a relative or somebody, they even they say, okay, you know, you don’t have to pay all the debt. There’s a 25 lakhs, you just give 5 lakhs. If 5 lakhs is also such a big amount, but is it 25 lakhs or is it a far bigger amount? In this case, what happens is because we don’t know how much is the past negative karma, so for us, it’s difficult to know what Krishna has done. And if we start expecting that, okay, in my life, because I’m practicing bhakti, there’ll be no problems.

Then that is an unrealistic expectation. There’s some karma which is not very likely to change. Now if somebody is, say, 4 and a half feet, and that is because of past karma. It’s not that they chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant chant. Chant Is it?

That is not going to happen. So certain kind of karma is not going to change. But when it comes to our present karma, now our present karma is affected by 2 things. It is affected by our knowledge. The kind of knowledge or I can say more specifically, it’s not just knowledge.

It’s not it’s so much. It’s. It’s intelligence. And not just our intelligence. It is affected by our, and it is affected by our vrutti.

Our tendencies. So by our past karma, we all have certain tendencies. Say, for example, somebody may be short-tempered. Now, all babies, when they’re small, they cry. But some babies cry as if they will bring the whole house down.

They say that their crying is screaming at the top of their lungs. It’s like, you know, we can say it’s good karma. They have powerful lungs, but they cry so much is not so, so good karma. Isn’t it? So, now sometimes some babies may also have more anger than others.

And as they grow up, their anger comes up a little bit more. So we all have certain karmic tendencies. So some people may see, we all sometimes know that something is good for us. Our intelligence tells us this is good and this is bad. But still, something from inside prevents us from doing that thing.

We’re just not able to do it. So what Bhakti will do for us is Krishna will handle the past karma. But how exactly he’ll handle and how much is our surrender because of which he’s reciprocating, all these are very difficult to know. So rather than worrying so much about the past karma, we focus on the present karma. And the more we start practicing bhakti, our buddhi becomes strengthened.

Bhakti strengthens our intelligence. We start getting a clearer and clearer understanding. Now this action will be beneficial. This action will be harmful. And that clarity itself is helpful.

You know, remember that morning I talked about, if somebody is sick. 2 people may be sick, but one is undiagnosed and is not is being untreated. Is untreated. The other is diagnosed and being treated. So when our intelligence becomes strong, that basically makes us like a patient who is being diagnosed.

And as the patient is being diagnosed, that means we at least understand. Okay. This is the disease, and this is going to worsen my situation. This is going to improve my situation. Now we may not know a 100%, but we do know to a significant extent.

And that itself gives a significant amount of help. Now without, like we say, See, without that without that our situation is like, you know, somebody has put a cloth on our body and we can’t see at the end, we are being punched. No. One punch comes from the front, one comes from the back. We can’t even see, so we can’t even deal with can’t even protect ourselves.

We can’t fight back. We can’t do anything. So that state of suffering is far greater. So when we get the gyana, that itself leads to a lot of decrease in suffering. But bhakti doesn’t just provide us the jnana.

Bhakti, the the vrtti, it becomes purified. So we all have desires. If we’re not practicing bhakti, our desires tend to be very self centered, very selfish. But the more we start practicing bhakti, our desires start becoming more selfless, more service oriented. So what happens by this?

The lust, anger, greed, they start decreasing. First of all, we understand more clearly that anger is bad. Say, lust is bad. See, the propaganda in today’s world is such that many people think that discover your passion. And they’re not talking about some finding your job.

They think, you know, okay. Get People think that increasing their sensual desires, that’ll lead to more happiness. People watch so many things which titillate them, stimulate them, agitate them. But then that causes more suffering. That causes so much more craving.

Because they just don’t know. Like say, suppose somebody has never drunk and has no interest in drinking. They pass by a bar, they don’t feel any agitation. But somebody who has drunk repeatedly, each time they pass by a bar, they have to fight against me. I will go and drink.

No. I’ll not go and drink. I’ll go and drink. I’ll not go and drink. That causes so much trouble, so much distress.

So just knowing what is the right thing to do and being freed from the unhealthy desires, that itself decreases suffering substantially. So when Krishna says, so that is a very important thing. And this if if we focus just on this blessing I’ll conclude with one last incident to illustrate this point. That if we just focus on this point, that right now by Krishna’s mercy, I know what is the healthy choice and what is unhealthy choice. That does not necessarily mean that in every situation we know exactly what is the right thing to do.

But we have a broad compass. We may not have an exact path. Okay. In this situation, what should I do? But we have a broad compass.

And that itself is a big relief. So after Krishna spoke the Bhagavad Gita, after Krishna assured Arjuna, after Arjuna said, yes, I surrender to you. After that, when the Kurukshetra war happened, Arjuna faced a devastating loss on the 13th day. What happened? Abhimanyu was killed.

Now Abhimanyu dying itself is terrible for Arjuna. But what made that even more terrible was his own personal sense of failure. See, what the Kauravas did was on 13th day, they did not form the Chakravyu right in the beginning. They had some other military formation. And then they arranged that.

There was a king Susharaman. He challenged Arjuna. And in that challenge, he diverted Arjuna away. So they went to a different part of the battlefield and they started fighting over there. And then once Arjuna was diverted, and quickly the Karkar was reorganized and they revealed the chakravi formation.

And then there was no way for the pandavas to penetrate it. So then Yudhishthir asked Abhimanyu to go inside. Abhimanyu went inside and unfortunately, he was trapped. And he fought heroically. But then the Kauras unfairly ganged up on him.

And 6 of them together attacked him and eventually killed him. That evening, when Arjuna came back, normally, when the warriors would come back, there would be celebratory music welcoming them back. That day when Arjuna was coming back, he had fought heroically against the, army of Sucharman. He destroyed many, many soldiers. And it was a long day.

He was tired. He was very successful. Still, you know, he felt an uneasy sensation within him. And as he came close to their tents, their camp, he noticed there was absolutely no music. There’s a somber silence over there.

And normally when we meet people, people greet, nod nod their head, smile. On this day, no one was ready to even meet Arjuna’s eye. And then a pit started forming in Arjuna’s stomach. And then Arjuna started wondering what has happened? What has gone wrong?

And then he remembered that in the heat of the battle, he had heard someone scream far away. The Kauravas have formed a chakravyu. He had been so busy fighting against the army of Susharaman, he had it had not registered him in at that time. He had not paid much attention. If something had been an emergency, he would have been called.

He thought like that. He started thinking, was a Chakravyu formed? If Chakravyu has been formed, then what happened? And has Yudhishthir been abducted? If Yudhishthir had been abducted, surely I would have known.

I would have been informed. So, what happened? So, the only person who knew that the chakra view can be broken, that is a woman knew. But he doesn’t know how to come out. Has something happened to him?

So, he just charged with his horse racing towards the central bandhal. And as soon as he entered, in the bandhal, there was an arrangement and each warrior had their particular throne. As soon as he entered, first his eyes went to Yudhishthir. So Yudhishthir was there. Then his eyes went to Abhimanyu’s throne and that was empty.

His eyes just didn’t want to believe his what they were seeing. Just desperate, hoping against hope that what he was seeing was not the reality. He again looked back more carefully at Yudhisthira and he saw that there were tears streaming down Yudhishthir’s eyes. Arjuna just collapsed and he started crying. Abhimanyu.

Abhimanyu. Abhimanyu. And he started thinking, you know, fire on me. He said, I went in the pursuit of glory and because of that I was not there to protect my son. Surely, when Abhivani was in the last moments, he must have called out to me.

He must have called out to his father. Why was I not there at that time? Yudhish still got up from his throne. Heavy steps, slowly he walked up to Arjuna. And he slowly told Arjuna what had happened.

So as Arjuna heard his grief started changing to anger. And then he lashed out at Yudhishthira. And Dima said, are all your weapons just ornaments? Could not one of you protect my son? Shame on you.

So when he spoke this sorry. So this is some past karma. Coming in the middle of some present karma. No? So anyway.

So at that time, Krishna for Yudhishthir. He was already in distress, and Arjuna’s words were like whiplashes. Both Arjuna Ayudhishthir and Bhima. So Krishna came up to Arjuna and pulled him into a sidewalk. He said, oh, Arjuna Partha, in this world, adversities come upon everyone, the wise and the unwise.

The difference between them is that when the adversities come, the unwise act in ways that make things worse. Whereas the wise act in ways that make things better. Oh Arjuna, look at the faces of your brothers. Due to the death of Abhimanyu, they are in agony. They are in pain just as you are.

Please don’t speak words that increase their pain. This jolted Arjuna out of his stupor. He was just in so much pain, just lashing out. Trying to do something about it. And that’s when as Arjuna heard the story again he recollected it.

He started thinking that actually his brothers had made a reasonable plan. That Abhimanyu would go inside and they would follow him. But Jayedra had come in the way. Therefore, Arjuna decided that Jayadr needs to be punished. And then, the next day, while the Pandavas Kauravas celebrated on 13th day, the 14th day was their worst defeat.

It was not just a jayrat who was killed, but the fact that the entire army of the Kauravas could not protect 1 warrior from 1 opposing warrior. That was morale shattering. It’s like, there’s 1 football player. The whole team is designed to stop that football player from getting to the goal. And if that football player effortlessly gets to the goal.

See, if our whole team can’t stop, then what is the use of even playing? So it became like that. So the point is that even Arjuna faced distress. And Krishna did not go into any particular past life philosophy explaining why this happened, past life karma, what this happened, that happened. Okay.

This has happened now. Let us see what we can do about it. So basically, when we talk about if we are practicing bhakti. Now bhakti, yes, it means remembering Krishna. It means loving Krishna.

But bhakti essentially means service attitude. And bhakti means seva vow. Now what does the service attitude mean? That we understand that Krishna is our well wisher, that Krishna wants the best for us. Krishna wants things to be better for us.

So if we are servants of Krishna, then that means we also act in a mood of service to Krishna to make things better. So what this means is that Krishna is our well wisher. So Krishna wants the best for us. So then our service attitude mean would mean, okay, now the situation has come, what is the best I can do in this situation? Now we may say, I don’t know what is the best.

Okay. We may not know what is the best, but can we know what is the worst? Like, say if there is some relationship, and we had tried everything and still that relationship is not improving. I don’t know what I can do about this. But maybe we can know what I can should not do, isn’t it?

If we just, for 10 minutes, remove our word, word, restrict, and just speak whatever is there in our mind and heart, Relationship cultivated over 10 years can be destroyed in 10 minutes. Isn’t it? That doesn’t mean we suppress our emotions. But we all know that certain things will make the situation worse. So with whatever buddhi we have, you say, okay.

Now the situation is there. Krishna, what can I do that will make things better? If we have that service attitude, Krishna will guide us. And the conviction that comes from practicing bhakti is that see that there are many many aspects of bhakti and shraddha and all those things But the most important aspect of practicing bhakti is that basically Krishna is on my side. This is the faith that we need to get.

See, basically, when we are functioning in the world, there is, I am here and there is some force beyond me. We may believe in God, we may not believe in God. We may believe in nature, whatever we believe in. Now with respect to this, there are only three factors. That this is for me, this is against me, or this is apathetic to me.

Doesn’t care for me. So ultimately, this is all we whatever exists beyond us, either it doesn’t care for us so to a large extent, the scientific world view is largely materialistic. Everything happens just according to physical laws. There is no God, you see. So it is we call it atheistic but the idea is there is no God that cares for us.

It’s apathetic. Now, some people may think that God is my enemy. That’s a very dark way to live in. But basically, if we are practicing bhakti, we will see so many stories of so many devotees who face such difficulties. Prahlad did nothing wrong and yet he suffered so much at least at an external level.

But what happened is, through it all, by remembering Krishna, he did not suffer so much. And eventually, Krishna protected him. So basically, what happens is if we can get this faith that Krishna is on my side, Therefore, I will be on Krishna’s side. So Krishna is on my side. Therefore, I will choose to be on Krishna’s side.

I don’t know exactly what is Krishna’s plan. But Krishna, I want to serve you. When Prabhupada asked what is the best prayer we can offer? He said, pray to Krishna, please give me the strength to serve you. Whatever be the situation I face, please give me the strength to serve you.

So if we have that attitude, then we will get the buddhi. And with small steps we take, by which gradually we will be able to improve things. Now some amount of improvement may happen in this life for us. Some amount of improvement may not be seen in this life. We’ll be purified and we’ll go beyond this world to Krishna.

But when we function in this way, basically, the past karma reservoir may not change. But the present karma, we can change. And we can ensure that no matter how dark our present may be, by trying to serve Krishna, we can make our future brighter. And that that is a power that every one of us has. So that is the faith.

Krishna says, if you become conscious of me, you will pass over all obstacles by my grace. Going back to that medicine metaphor, the world can hurt us in many ways. But when we practice bhakti, I mentioned what happens is for us, Krishna becomes bigger than the world. So what this means is that the world has much power to hurt us. World people can hurt us.

The environment, the weather can hurt us. Our own body can hurt us. But what happens is we understand that greater than the world’s power to hurt is Krishna’s power to heal. And it is this faith that the practice of bhakti increases more more and more for us. And that’s how the problems of our life, even if they come, they do not disturb us so much.

Greater than the world’s power to hurt is Krishna’s power to heal. That is how bhakti decreases our klesha agni and it helps us. It helps us create a brighter future for us. So the klesha agni happens because yeah, although these problems are there, Krishna is with me. I am not alone in this big bad world trying to struggle against it.

Krishna is with me, and I will choose to be with Krishna. So understanding this Krishna is on my side, this will lead to the klesha Agni. The suffering. Suffering doesn’t just come because, there is problems. When we feel I’m in these problems and I’m alone and nobody cares for me, nobody won’t nobody even bought this bothered whether I exist, whether I live or die.

That’s when the suffering becomes far more. And when you understand Krishna is on our side, that glacier decreases. And, once we choose to be on Krishna’s side, then yes, the present may be dark. But by Krishna’s mercy, the future will be brighter. So I’ll summarize what I discussed.

I discussed 4 main points. 1st, we talked about the principle of karma. How karma is not just a philosophical concept, it is like a universal observation. It is the basis of science. It is also the basis of human training.

The only difficulty that happens is, that it is not always just action and result. It is often, there is the present action and there is the present result, but there is also the past action that is playing a role. And sometimes the past action might be negative, and that’s why the present result might not be positive. Enough as much as we expect. So basically, karma works in a complex way.

But still, the important thing is our actions matter. That is the key take home from the principle of karma. That what I am doing right now, it matters. If I’m doing good, the good will result in the future. If somebody is doing bad, that will lead to bad, even if that is not manifested now.

Then we discuss the concept of destiny. Is karma fixed? Yes. Destiny is fixed. But how destiny unfolds, how it manifests in our life, that is not fixed.

I discussed how somebody may be betrayed and cheated in this life. But how they live in this life may decide how much support they get when they are cheated. So that’s why we discussed this pendulum, that present karma and past karma. So, it is best if the present and past are both good, then we have bright decision. The most dangerous is, when the past karma is positive and present karma is negative.

Because they will they will create suffering for themselves. This is bad when the person is not so harmful. Now this is something which we learn to we need to learn to tolerate. So I’m going through some difficult situations, but they will end. And for that purpose, then we discuss about how does bhakti affect our karma?

Bhakti and karma, we discuss that. So basically, there is past karma, and this is unknown. So it is best not to worry too much about this. So accept that Krishna is doing something for my benefit with that karma. But the present karma, that is the most important thing.

So our present action is shaped by our intelligence and by our tendencies. And Krishna strengthens our intelligence through bhakti, and then he purifies our tendencies. And by this, what happens is we can start creating a brighter future. And that means, I took the story of Arjuna and Abhimanyu to illustrate that essentially, when we talk about bhakti, bhakti means And means that if Krishna is my well wisher, then let me see how I can If Krishna wants the best for me, how can I do my best? How can I play my part in Krishna’s plan?

So, basically, Krishna is with me. And therefore, I will be with Krishna. So to the extent we understand Krishna is with me, our klesha will decrease. And to the extent we choose to be with Krishna, the shubha in our life will increase. The world can hurt us in many ways, but rather than worrying about how and why the world is hurting us, we turn toward Krishna.

And Krishna’s power to heal is always greater. Whatever karma may get us to, whatever karma may get us to, Krishna will get us through. Thank you very much. Hooray. So do we have time for questions?

Should we take tomorrow? Yeah. So so what we can do is this was because there are multiple concepts to discuss over here. So the class went a little over time. But if you have questions, you can note down the questions.

And maybe tomorrow, instead of going to the future characters of the, first we will tackle we’ll address the questions, and then we’ll move forward. There can be many different questions, and I I’ll try to address them as much as I can. But, it’s, it’s a very important and practical topic. So I would like to devote some time. So if you have questions, please note them down, and, we’ll continue tomorrow.

Thank you very much.

The post 3 Six characteristics of bhakti – How bhakti removes distress & brings auspiciousness appeared first on The Spiritual Scientist.

Boundless Devotion: Insights from ISKCON Radhadesh
→ Dandavats

HH Krishna Kshetra Swami delivers an engaging discourse at ISKCON Radhadesh, blending song, humor, and deep spiritual insights. He reflects on Lord Chaitanya’s love, the significance of chanting Krishna’s names, and the boundless devotion of Radha and Krishna. Interweaving scripture, stories, and affirmations, he inspires gratitude, unity, and a heartfelt longing for spiritual growth and
Read More...

Photos and video from London Saturday Night Harinama 25/01/2025
→ Dandavats

Please find below photos from last Saturday night’s Harinama Sankirtan in London. Slideshow (sound on supported systems): https://davidc.zenfolio.com/saturday_night_harinama_sankirtan_25012025/slideshow Gallery: https://davidc.zenfolio.com/saturday_night_harinama_sankirtan_25012025 The slideshow soundtrack is from Melbourne, but the same melody was use for the middle part of the evening here. Original is at: https://youtu.be/Db0HpevRRXg?t=495 Your servant, David
Read More...

Strict discipline in the matter of moral and immoral activities
→ Dandavats

Translation Here the use of the verb “bhavet,” which is in the imperative mood, tells us that this certainly must be done. Noncompliance would be abandonment of duty. Purport This imperative is applicable to pure devotees. Neophytes will be able to understand these affairs only after being elevated by regulated devotional service under the expert
Read More...

Sacred Ground
→ Travelling Monk

“I hate you people and all you stand for!” shouted the school’s headmaster. “There’s no way I will ever, and I repeat, EVER, rent this school to you during Woodstock.” With that he slammed the door, leaving Nandini dasi standing dumbstruck with no alternate accommodations for most of the 700 devotees coming for the event.

Fifteen minutes later her 4 year-old son, Alex, who was playing with his friends nearby wandered over and casually walked into the headmaster’s office. “I want to tell you something….” he began. The headmaster, startled by the youngster’s bravery, decided to listen to what he had to say.

Years later the headmaster told Nandini, “I never heard a 4 year-old speak so articulately in my life, what to speak of his convincing arguments why you people should have the school!” Back then he had granted permission for us to use the school after Alex convinced him it was the right thing to do.

That was in 2013. Since then the headmaster has welcomed us back every year during Woodstock and has become a great admirer of our movement. As always, he was even there to greet us last week when two of our buses from Ukraine and Moldova arrived at his school two days before for the twenty-third Woodstock festival.

“Trouble’s brewing,” he said warily, as he greeted Nandini.

He didn’t have to explain. Most everyone in the country was aware that the conservative government was not happy with the Woodstock festival and was doing everything it could to try and stop it from taking place.

“Yes, I know,” said Nandini. “Their latest attempt to shut the festival down is to impose so many security restrictions that it will be too expensive to proceed. I heard that the organizers made a desperate public appeal for financial help today.”

“Even if they get the funds,” said the headmaster, “the restrictions are so imposing that it will be impossible for the event to function properly. They plan to do an extensive search of each and every vehicle coming to the event. They say they’re afraid of terrorists. Rumor has it that snipers will cover the event from the nearby hills.”

The next morning I told my driver Guru Kripa das to get our van ready to go down to the Woodstock field where a number of our men had been busy setting up our Krishna’s Village of Peace for two weeks.

“Give me half an hour,” he said. “I have to run to get the special pass and ID papers that the government issued for our van.”

“Wow” it’s really true,” I thought. “This year’s Woodstock festival might be pretty intense.”

One hour later we approached an ominous looking checkpoint on the only road leading into the festival sight. Suddenly six policemen in riot gear appeared from behind a barricade and approached our van—their hands on their guns.

“Driver, stop the van!” shouted one through a megaphone. “Take the keys out of the ignition and step out of the car slowly, with your hands above your head. Everyone else in the van do the same. Now!”

As we stood in the road they patted us down and searched the van.

“Now get back in,” the same officer said.

A little confused by what was going on, we moved slowly back toward the van.

“Move it!” the officer barked. As we drove away, I made eye contact with him and tried to smile. He just glared back. I noted that his badge was number 44. I would warn other devotees who would be coming through to be cautious.

As we drove into the festival site I said to the other men in the car, “They’re definitely going to have to change the motto of this festival from ‘Peace, Love and Rock and Roll.’”

Once we arrived at our village, set upon one-half hector of land, all tension diminished. The men had done a great job in setting up all the colorful tents, including the big one of over 50 meters long.

“We’ve been lucky,” said a new devotee who was helping. “The weatherman has been predicting rain every day, but it hasn’t rained once!”

“It’s not luck” I corrected him, “It’s Krishna’s mercy. In Krsna Book, Queen Kunti says to the Lord, ‘So, my dear Krishna, there is no question of bad luck; we are always in an auspicious position because of Your grace.’ What was true then is also true now if we’re serving Krishna’s mission. Our lives are always auspicious.”

As I walked around the large area set aside for our village I marveled at the fact that we’d set up our village thirteen times on the same field. “It’s become sacred ground,” I mused. “One can feel the atmosphere has changed because of the many hours and days we’ve chanted the holy names at this exact location. Not only us, but the thousands of people who come to Woodstock and chant Hare Krishna with us.”

“Sacred Ground!” I called out enthusiastically, “It’s true!” causing all the devotees working at the site to look up at me curiously.

“Incessantly they discuss the narrations of Sri Krishna’s pastimes with one another and chant the names of Krsna which bestow pure devotion. Overwhelmed with ecstasy they preach the Hare Krishna Mantra throughout the earth to destroy the sins of the age of Kali.”

[ Sarvabhauma Bhattacarya, Susloka-Satakam, text 76 ]

The next morning we held a meeting with all 700 devotees present. I stressed the historic nature of our presence at Woodstock and how we had to take advantage of the opportunity to reach these young people with the holy names.

“Carpe diem” I began. “That’s a Latin aphorism which means ‘seize the moment.’ Seventy-five years ago this very place where we are sitting was a war zone with mass killings committed by both the allied and axis armies. No one was safe—no man, woman or child. But now Russian, German, and American devotees can come together as brothers and sisters, in a time of peace—free to spread our message. We must do so with a sense of urgency because we all know that history often repeats itself. Let’s chant and dance with a common purpose—giving the one million young people coming to Woodstock a simple and joyful solution to all the upheaval in this world!”

As I closed, the devotees let out a huge roar. Then and there I knew that somehow Krishna would arrange for Woodstock to go on.

The day before the actual Woodstock festival begins, is traditionally “Hare Krishna Day.” Most of the people have arrived at Woodstock by that time and we open our village at 11:00 a.m. Much to the delight of the people, we started early with full prasadam distribution at our Food for Peace tent—despite the complications of getting our prasadam vans through the congested traffic caused by the police security checks. I was amazed to see people literally running toward the massive tent as the news spread that we were selling prasadam for a nominal fee. Moments later we rolled our massive Ratha Yatra cart onto the one and only street running through the grounds, accompanied by a rousing kirtan with 100 devotees. The sacred grounds were becoming even more sanctified!

As the rumbling chariot made it’s way through the throngs of people, I gave a flower garland I was wearing to a girl who was pulling on one of the ropes. She had a can of beer in one hand and a cigarette in the other. She looked at the garland, and quickly threw away both the beer and the cigarette.

“Doesn’t match,” she said. “Two different worlds.”

“One down, 999,000 to go” I chuckled to myself.

Many of the youth came forward to either pull the chariot, or sing and dance with us. I was initially surprised that so many seemed to know the Hare Krishna Mantra. So I pulled one disheveled boy with a wild mohawk haircut aside and asked him, “How do you know the song?”

“It’s Kali Yuga, man,” he shouted above the roar of the kirtan, “there’s no other way!” With that he jumped back into the kirtan chanting with abandon.

We had printed a special invitation beckoning people to come to our village and everyone seemed to be accepting them. Within two hours all 10,000 we brought with us for that day were distributed. As I was expressing my displeasure to the kirtan leader that we hadn’t brought enough invitations, a young woman overheard us.

“Don’t worry, everyone here knows about Krishna’s Village of Peace” she said. “There was an online survey done last week on the official Woodstock website. One question was: ‘where do you spend most of your money at Woodstock?’

Ninety percent of the people replied, ‘At the Hare Krishna’s, Food for Peace tent!’”

That evening our Mantra Yoga tent swelled with people as Mahatma dasa, Sivarama Swami, BB Govinda Maharaja, Bada Haridas and Madhava prabhu led kirtan, one after another. As we ended the kirtan at 1:00 a.m. and I went outside, I was surprised to see the Questions and Answers tent still full of around 100 people. I expressed my surprise to one of our security men who said, “Yep, I stand here and watch ’em go from the kirtan tent to the Question and Answers tent, and then on to the book tent where most of the time they walk out with either a Bhagavad-Gita, a cookbook, or the Srila Prabhupada Lilamrita.

Before going back to our base, I walked over to our Food for Peace tent.

“How’s it going?” I asked Rasikendra dasa.

“30,000 plates of prasadam today,” he said with a big smile. “And we’ve started cooking for the morning now.”

“What about getting some rest?” I said astonished.

“Too much nectar flowing,” he said as he walked off. Then he turned and added, “Oh yeah, we’re giving maha prasadam to the police at the roadblocks and they’re starting to ease up on us. Now we’re getting all the prasadam vans through pretty quickly. From the four school kitchens to the festival site it takes only thirty minutes. ”

The next day Woodstock’s organizer, Jurek Owsiak, called and asked us to come for the grand opening on the main stage. “Could you bring some of your theater performers in their colorful outfits?” he asked. At 3:00 p.m. we went to the back of the main stage and were met by security men who immediately took us up the stairs to the stage. The main security man said, “After Jurek and a few musicians come on, you’ll be next in line. You can go straight to the front. You’ll be in full view of the crowd of 300,000 people.”

Within moments Jurek went onstage and thanked all the people present for assisting in his charity work to help children’s hospitals. He told them the Woodstock festival was his reciprocation for all their hard work. Then he said loudly that no politics could stop the event and that they were all victorious in face of huge opposition that year. Relaxing his tone, he turned to the devotees and myself and said, “Let us thank Krishna’s Village of Peace for being with us again with their good food and all their entertainment!” As 300,000 people applauded I waved and said softly, “Srila Prabhupada I pray you are watching and that you are pleased.”

With that little mention from Jurek, our village was soon filled to capacity. At any one time there were between 5,000 – 10,000 people in our main tent, in line for prasadam, henna drawings, taking yoga classes, attending seminars, or just walking around our spotlessly clean area.

That night Acyuta Gopi dasi arrived from New York and brought the house down with her late night kirtan in the Mantra Yoga tent.

The next morning, Nandini came running toward me waving a newspaper in the air as I was getting in the van to go down to the festival site.

“Gurudeva! Gurudeva! Look! Gazeta Wyborcza, one of the biggest newspapers in the country has a positive front page article on Woodstock and the cover photo is our Ratha Yatra parade.”

We both stared at awe at the newspaper. “I never imagined we’d get such recognition, especially in the present political climate,” I said.

“It’s due to the service of so many wonderful devotees this year,” she said. “And maybe a little luck.”

“Not luck,” I said with a smile, repeating my words from the day before. “Our lives are auspicious because of Krishna’s grace.”

As our van approached the security check at the Woodstock field thirty minutes later, I could see policemen were checking cars with less scrutiny. When we approached, a policeman just glanced at us and waved us on.

“They must have retired the snipers by now.” I joked to the devotees in the car.

By the time we arrived, prasadam distribution was in full swing.

“I’m going to distribute prasadam for a few minutes before the Ratha Yatra parade begins,” I told the devotees in the van.

As I stepped into the Food for Peace tent and looked out at the eight lines stretching back 80 yards each, I couldn’t believe my eyes. Joining one of the serving teams, I chose to serve the last preparation in line, halavah. It has always been one of the festival-goers favorites. With a serving spoon, I dipped into the pot and took a generous dose, carefully placing it on a young man’s empty plate in from of me.

“You’re not taking rice or vegetables?” I asked curiously.

“No” he said, standing there staring at the plate.

“Please move along!” urged one of the servers as the boy continued staring at the halavah. “There are people waiting.”

“Just one second.” he said with a smile. Then he dipped his finger into the halvah and then into his mouth.

“Ahhhh!” he said pausing for a few more moments. “I’ve been waiting twelve months to relish that taste!”

“A worthy veteran of our festival” I said to him as I eased him forward.

After twenty minutes, I relinquished my spot in the server’s line, thinking, “I should get a picture of the long line.”

Taking out my camera I took a few shots of people nearby and then with a long lens focused further down the line. To my surprise I saw 3 policemen in line.

Pushing my lens as far as it would go, I saw their insignias, ranks and, then to my surprise, badge number 44! It was the policeman who had been so rough with us the first day we entered Woodstock.

I said softly, “Just see how people’s hearts are changed by the association of devotees of the Lord!”

Ten minutes later I was in front of the Ratha Yatra cart as it once again slowly made it’s way down the crowded avenue, pulled by more festival-goers than devotees. After forty-five minutes, the kirtan was again roaring when suddenly a young man, dressed only in dirty jeans and literally covered from head to toe in all kinds of strange tattoos, came running forward, falling right in front of me in prone position, as if offering dandavats. As the Ratha Cart quickly moved forward I asked a few of the men to remove him.

“Gently” I said.

As soon as he was raised off the ground, he came forward and tightly embraced me. From the combination of dirt, grime, and the odor of his body, it was obvious he had not bathed in weeks.

“Take him off!” commanded one of the men to a devotee close to us.

“No,” I said. “It’s OK.”

I continued to lead the kirtan for a minute or two more with him hanging on me until he finally broke free and started walking alongside me, swerving from side to side, obviously under the influence of alcohol, or some drug.

Then twenty minutes later when I stopped to sing in one place he fell prone on the ground again in front of me. This time I could hear him say something. I thought I even heard the words, “Krishna prestaya butale.”

“No, that couldn’t be,” I concluded.

Back on his feet, he once again embraced me tightly, and to the horror of all the devotees, kissed me on the cheek.

Again, security rushed forward.

“It’s OK.” I said. “He’s not dangerous.”

An hour later he was still by my side as I was finishing up and ready to hand the microphone over to another chanter. Suddenly he grabbed the microphone from my hand and started singing the maha mantra intensely with his eyes closed.

“How’s this possible?” I said to myself.

After a few stanzas I took the microphone back. It just looked so strange, even at Woodstock, a man like this with every inch of his visible body covered in ghostly-looking tattoos.

As I passed the microphone over to another devotee I walked a little distance away to catch my breath. Out of the corner of my eye I saw the drunken boy follow me.

“Sorry” he said in English as he embraced me one more time again.

For a moment I was speechless.

“Sorry?” I said almost a question.

“Yes,” he replied with his head down. “I’m your fallen disciple, Bhakta Rafal. Many years ago I lived at the New Santipur Farm in southern Poland. I used to serve you when you visited. In my heart, I chose you as my spiritual master. You don’t recognize me now with all my tattoos,” he said. “Please save me Guru Maharaja!”

“It’s alright Rafal,” I said. “Don’t worry. Join us in all the kirtans today and tomorrow and take lots of prasadam. Try to get your taste back for Krishna consciousness. We’ll speak more later in the day. But right now, let’s get back to the parade.”
,As we walked back he clung tightly to me. In my mind I prayed, “Srila Prabhupada, please save this man.”

Everything went smoothly throughout the day at our village. As evening approached, Rasikendra dasa approached me.

“Srila Gurudeva,” he said, “We’ve cooked almost twenty-six tons of food. I think we’ll do more than 150,000 plates of prasadam before Woodstock is over. We ran out of rice this morning. I went store to store and bought every grain of rice in the town! The store owners are very happy with us!”

“Yes, everything is auspicious by Krishna’s grace, “ I said.

As I hurriedly walked towards the Mantra Yoga tent eager to join in BB Govinda Maharaja’s kirtan, a young man approached me.

“Please sir, can I have five minutes of your time?” he pleaded.

“Well, I’m trying to get to the kirtan tent …” I said impatiently.

“Please,” he said, grabbing my arm.

Sensing his sincerity, I stopped and said calmly, “Sure, what is it?”

“Last year at Woodstock my friend approached you with several questions. You spoke together in English. Not speaking English, I couldn’t understand. But after the Woodstock festival I saw many wonderful changes in my friend, which he attributed to his conversation with you.

“Personally, I went through a very challenging year. At wits end, I turned toward spirituality to deal with the crisis in my life. One day I remembered how you had helped my friend. So you know what I did?”

“No what did you do?” I asked.

I enrolled in a course to learn English so I could talk freely with you at this year’s Woodstock festival. I went to 3 classes a week for most of the year. I even went to London for two weeks to practice my English.”

“Well then,” I said taking his hand, “let’s sit down over there on the grass have a long conversation…”

By the last day of Woodstock all the devotees were exhausted. But that didn’t stop them from doing their services. Each one of them was enlivened to see how much people loved Krishna’s Village of Peace.

As the kirtans started for the final evening in the Mantra Yoga tent, one devotee from Croatia approached me.

“Maharaja can I ask you a question?” he said.

“Sure” I replied.

“This is my first time at Krishna’s Village of Peace at Woodstock,” he began. “I’ve noticed some things here that I haven’t seen in other devotee festivals.”

“Like what?” I asked.

“Well, for one thing, in your big tent you have non-devotee bands playing in the evening. Thousands of people come. But I’m wondering how Krishna conscious it is having karmi music playing in the village?”

“It’s not for devotees of course, “ I said. “And we don’t allow any immoral songs or the use of bad words.”

“But …” the boy interjected.

“Let me ask you a question.” I continued. “Where do all the thousands of kids go after the concerts?”

He thought for a moment and replied, “Most of them walk over to the Food for Peace tent to eat prasadam.”

“And then?” I said.

“Well after that a lot end up in the Mantra Yoga tent.”

“And what do they do there?” I asked.

“They chant Hare Krishna and dance wildly for hours.” he said with a smile.

“Yes,” I said. “This is all in line with a verse by Rupa Goswami that Srila Prabhupada used to quote a lot:

yena tena prakarena manah krsna nivesayet
sarve vidhi-nisedha syur etayor eva kinkarah

“A spiritual master should devise means by which people may somehow or other come to Krishna consciousness. All rules and regulations are subordinate to this principle.”

( Bhakti Rasamrta Sindhu 1.2.4 )

“A preacher has to be innovative in spreading the message of Krishna consciousness according to time, place and circumstance without compromising the tradition.” I concluded.

“Well, what about the devotee ladies leading the dance steps down in front of the stage?” he asked. “The whole crowd follows them. I haven’t seen that anywhere.”

“Again, it is something we only do at Woodstock and our festivals along the coast,” I replied. “It helps people to focus, the result being they chant and dance with us for hours on end.

“Srila Prabhupada wanted us to come up with novel ways to spread Krishna consciousness. He once famously said, ‘Tax your brains how to spread this movement.

“His spiritual master, Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati went to great extremes and was very innovative in getting people involved in Krsna consciousness.”

Pulling out my phone, I searched my notes and read to him one of my favorite passages from a book by Bhakti Vikas Swami on the life and teachings of Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati:

“His [Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Saravati’s] exposition was divided into two sections, spiritual and secular, with items collected from every part of India, and the whole extravaganza covering more than one square mile. The secular division demonstrated miscellaneous departments of human endeavour, medical, educational, agricultural, arts and crafts, cattle and livestock, child welfare, athletics, and amusements. Several provincial governments sent materials to be displayed. Other attractions were performances of athletic feats such as gymnastics, wrestling, boxing, sword and stick play, and jujitsu. There were musical competitions, dramas, film shows, a circus, and in the words of the Harmonist, ‘other varieties of innocent amusements.’ Prizes, medals, and certificates were awarded to deserving exhibitors and performers.

“The spiritual section was even more elaborate. A museum contained figures of Visnu and Krsna, and other religious objects such as memorabilia formerly used by reputed sadhus. A book display featured volumes produced by different religious sects in diverse languages and manuscripts of rare unpublished religious works. There were photos and paintings of eminent sadhus and sundry sacred places. A major draw was a huge relief map of India-occupying over a third of an acre-constructed on the ground with stone, cement, and brick and showing prominent holy places, the locations of all Gaudiya Matha branches, and the routes of Sri Caitanya and Lord Nityananda’s tours. Dioramas in over fifty stalls depicted manifold religious praxes of India, with emphasis on Caitanya Mahaprabhu’s teachings. The practices of pure Vaisnavas, pseudo-Vaisnavas, and other religious sects were illustrated by life-size dolls set against backgrounds of appropriate painted scenes, many representing incidents in the pastimes of Lord Caitanya. Another novelty for numerous visitors was the brilliant illumination of the entire grounds by recently installed electricity.”

[Sri Bhaktisiddhanta Vaibhava, ‘Theistic Exhibitions’ pgs. 355 – 356 ]

Madhava prabhu’s kirtan that night ushered in the next morning’s sunrise. It was the cherry on top of the cake of the best Woodstock festival in twenty-three years.

I awoke bleary-eyed and exhausted.

“I have to get up!” I coaxed myself. “We have to clean up and break down our whole village today and get back on the Baltic Sea coast in two days for three more weeks of our usual festivals.”

When I arrived around 9:00 a.m. there were already thirty devotees busy taking our village apart. Outside our village, people were streaming out of the festival to catch buses and trains home.

“How do these devotees do it!” I said to myself. “It can only be Gaura shakti, the internal energy of Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu.”

As I walked by the Food for Peace tent, which had mostly been disassembled, a few devotees came up to me.

“Srila Gurudeva,” one of them said, “we found a pot of rice and a pot of halavah that somehow didn’t get distributed. What shall we do with it?”

I thought for a moment and said, “Lets set up a small table on the sidewalk out there and distribute to people who are leaving. Find a nice tablecloth, clean yourselves up, find some plates and spoons, put up a little sign….”

The exhausted devotees looked at me incredulously, bags under their dreary eyes.

“There’s only enough for thirty or forty plates, Srila Gurudeva,” one devotee said. “We distributed 150,000 plates over the last five days. What difference will it make if just a few more people get prasadam?”

“Come a little closer and sit down.” I said, “I’ll tell you a short story.”

“Once there were two men walking on a beach after a huge storm. Thousands upon thousands of small fish had been washed up onto the beach and were flapping helplessly on the sand. As the men walked along one of them reached down and picked up three fish. With a swift motion of his arm he threw them back into the water.

Surprised, his friend stopped and asked, “Why did you do that? There are thousands of fish on the beach. What difference does it make if you throw three of them back into the sea?”

The first man smiled and replied, “It makes a difference to them!”

Hearing the story the devotees jumped up and with renewed enthusiasm gathered the materials to distribute the last drops of mercy to the people of Woodstock.

**********************

“ I bow down to Gaura, the beautiful son of Mother Saci, who is worshipped by the chanting of the holy names in the age of Kali, who is the son of Nanda Maharaja come again, who is the extraordinary brilliant ornament of the earth, whose various preaching methods are suitable for people in this world of birth and death, whose consciousness is fixed in meditation on His form of Vrajendra-nandana Krishna and who is worshipped together with His abode of Sri Navadvipa Dhama.”

[Sarvabhauma Bhattacarya, Sri Saci-sutastakam – 8 Prayers Glorifying the Son of Sri Saci devi, text 7]

Iskcon Spiritual Milestones and Events Across the World, January 26
→ Dandavats

By Dandavats Staff Writer

Live to Give 2024 Celebration. Free Write Journal. Srila Prabhupada's Murti Installed at ISKCON Valsad. Iskcon Connection Newsletter. Appreciating Devotees: Path to Divine Connection. The Lord can perfectly play the part of any living entity. The beauty of Krishna consciousness. Sacrifice, Service, and Surrender in Krishna Consciousness. Mayapur Mellows - 2025. Recharge Festival. ISKCON Parsippany - Walkthrough Video Continue reading "Iskcon Spiritual Milestones and Events Across the World, January 26
→ Dandavats"