(Kadamba Kanana Swami, 08 June 2014, Stockholm Sweden, Sunday Feast, Srimad Bhagavatam 1.5.14)
When Srila Prabhupada came to Germany, he met Sacinandana swami’s father. His son had just become a devotee and Sacinandana Maharaj’s father asked a question to Prabhupada,”How can a crocodile survive in the Rhine?” Srila Prabhupada’s answer was, “It is not required to wear this dress. One can also be in plain clothes and be a devotee.” So, there are many quotes on this story, some a little dramatic. Then Sacinandana Maharaj’s father was very impressed and said, “Oh, your guru is very intelligent.” Because Prabhupada understood that question, ‘A crocodile in the Rhine!’
We see that many spiritual traditions in the world have two sides to it. One monastic side, a priestly class, that wear some kind of uniform, some dress standing for spirituality that distinguishes them from the world and gives them their spiritual identity. The other is the secular feature. So, I think that the Krsna West approach to Krsna consciousness is going to be the secular feature of the movement, and best, and has always been because it is not a new invention. It has already been there, now it is just that the idea is formalised a bit more. You already know about the Krsna West because most of the time you are dressed in the Krsna West uniform, so the secular aspect.
Now the secular aspect of Krsna consciousness – Krsna consciousness is a transplant, it is ‘A crocodile that has been put into the Rhine’. It is another culture, not a tradition. The dress, well what is our idea of the Vedic dress? The kurta as Hridayananda Maharaj rightly points out, is a Muslim invention and the cholis are not exactly Vedic. But saris and some sort of dhotis or whatever, that sort of goes back to a more traditional thing. The chaadhar – very traditional! So it was born out of another culture. The clothes, they come out of a culture. This was born out of a culture that had tried to regulate sexual activity and therefore was not ‘putting it’ some much out into the public. Therefore, certain parts of the bodies were nicely covered. This (sannyasa) cloth is different! Tight jeans kind of displays whatever is there, right! Or when ladies walk around with tight jeans and tight t-shirts with nothing under it and chant Hare Krsna at the same time! Hare Krsna is nicely chanted but the dress is of a different culture, a culture that deals with sexuality in a different way.
Now, when I brought up this argument to Hridayananda Maharaj, he pointed out, “Yes, I am not saying we should wear those kinds of clothes, I am talking about wearing sattvic Western clothes, something in the mode of goodness.” All right, nice, better than those other clothes which incite passion. But I can imagine that many people in the world could relate much easier to Krsna consciousness if it was not in such an oriental religious guise; you know, if it was a little more integrated. For those people, it is good. But I also think that as all traditions of the world show the monastic aspect of spiritual tradition, there are those people who are full time dedicated to it, without having to compromise with society. They are withdrawn from society. They are spending all their time with their spirituality and they become the spiritual leaders, the inspiration for the secular practitioners. So, I think that is, in my estimation, the best we can expect from Krsna West with all due respect to the efforts that are out there. I think it is nothing new, it sounds more dramatic than it is.
I am a sannyasi by vow, the vows are strict! I find that if we just dressed in jeans and in regular clothes then I would find that a burden. I find that if I would just let my hair grow and a little beard, I would sort of lose a certain amount of self-discipline. I find that even every once in a while when I shave my head, it reconfirms my self-discipline. So, I find I get benefits from all these practises on a personal level and therefore I am quite convinced that it is beneficial!