
Famous American rapper of Jamaican descent Lawrence Krisna Parker talks about Hare Krishna
→ Dandavats.com

Websites from the ISKCON Universe
The post October 3rd, 2013 – Darshan appeared first on Mayapur.com.
Radhastami Abhishek 2013
The commentaries on SB 2.7.31 by Viśvanātha and Prabhupāda are very interesting to compare. The verse itself is
nandaḿ ca mokṣyati bhayād varuṇasya pāśād
gopān bileṣu pihitān maya-sūnunā ca
ahny āpṛtaḿ niśi śayānam atiśrameṇa
lokaḿ vikuṇṭham upaneṣyati gokulaḿ sma
He freed Nanda, his father, from the fearful noose of Varuṇa; and freed the cowherd boys from the caves that Maya’s son locked them in. When all of Gokula lay down at night, so exhausted from working hard throughout the day, he showed them Vaikuṇṭha.
It’s interesting that this verse, which starts by saying how Krishna freed his father from ropes, comes right after the previous verse, which was about how Krishna’s mother couldn’t bind him with ropes. It is impossible to overestimate how beautifully cinematic and artistically exquisite Śrīmad Bhāgavatam is. We who are born without knowledge of Sanskrit and its cultural context are really disadvantaged by birth – we should frankly admit. Those who have direct access to Śrīmad Bhāgavatam are potentially the most fortunate beings in existence.
Anyway, the part I intended to post about…
ahny āpṛtaḿ niśi śayānam atiśrameṇa
This is the part that says “during the day, working, at night, sleeping, so exhausted” [literal translation]. Viśvanātha’s commentary is that this refers directly to what happened after Nanda was arrested by Varuṇa. Krsna entered the waters, and the rest of Gokula spent the whole day looking everywhere in extreme distress for Krishna and his father. After they were completely exhausted, they collapsed at night – then Krishna and Nanda emerged again from Varuṇa’s realm and came of from the waters. Krishna encouraged everyone by showing them Gokula’s Vaikuṇṭha majesties.
Following the previous verse, this verse keeps the same theme – how the sweet, intimate affection of the Vrajavāsīs is so powerful that it overwhelms and subsums the awareness of Krishna’s majesty, which they do certainly possess (previous verse showed Yaśoda Mātā fully aware that all of existence was within her child, this verse shows all of Gokula fully aware that all of Vaikuṇṭha is within Vṛndāvana).
Prabhupāda’s translation and purport comes from a different angle, very interesting. He makes the point that the residents of Gokula were working hard day and night for Krishna – they were not practicing yoga or studying scriptures or even doing Bhakti-Sādhana. But because their activities were already at the highest level of Krishna consciousness (giving 200% of their energy constantly to pleasing Krishna), they attain the highest spiritual revelations.
ISKCON members would certainly be tempted to misuse this purport to justify the “Work now, samadhī later” abuse. Certainly it will appeal to the idea that, we just have to work hard for Srila Prabhupada there is no need to concentrate on bhajan, on sadhana. However, I have to point out my opinion that this is a ludicrous metaphor resulting from latent sahajiya outlooks. It is cheap (sahajiya) to equate ones own daily activities with the eternally liberated activities of the eternally liberated Vrajavāsīs. Our activities of managing affairs in ISKCON are heavily mixed with our own karmic propensities. Our activities of studying scripture are similarly heavily mixed with our own propensities to become wealthy in knowledge for the purpose of being promoted to positions of respect and command. We cannot say that our busy-ness is equal to the business of the Vraja Vasis. It is offensive. We need - urgently – to practice bhakti-sādhanas so that one day we can be fit to absorb the compassionate mercy of the Vrajavāsī nitya-siddhas. This must scrupulously be understood and no compromise should be allowed – in my opinion, for whatever it may be worth.
Śrīla Prabhupada and Śrīla Viśvanātha say that the Vrajavāsīs worked all day trying to find Krishna. Let us follow that example.
Radha Rasesvara temple is located in a coconut tree and cocoa plant area in the hills outside Denpasar. The devotees were able to buy a good amount of land to build an asrama and temple. Since then more land has been acquired for a goshalla, vegetable garden, pond and shop.
(Kadamba Kanana Swami, 30 August 2013, Goloka Dhama, Germany, Hamsaduta Seminar Part 1)
Compassion means that when we experience something ourselves then, we can do something for others who are going through what we are going through. I have thought about compassion as a topic and dealt with the topic. Every year, I have been going to Mamgachi in Mayapur, particularly to the place of Vasudev Datta, to meditate on his extraordinary compassion. Vasudev Datta was ready to take all the sinful reactions of the whole universe upon him. Every year when we went there, we were praying, meditating and speaking about Vasudev Datta.
Subsequently, I went to Bangladesh and I went to the birthplace of Vasudev Datta and I spoke in that particular place and meditated further on Vasudev Datta. Gradually, I began to think of how can one become compassionate if one is not experiencing something better? When one is experiencing that Krsna consciousness is blissful, only then can one be really compassionate. Otherwise, it is artificial. Otherwise, we are just trying to put it within the frame of mind. But when we are actually experiencing the happiness of Krsna consciousness, then compassion becomes really possible otherwise, it will be hard.
That happiness is not a mystery; that happiness is not something like, “When will it happen?” It is not that we are in Krsna consciousness but still not happy. That simply means that we are not following the path of Krsna. It means that we are not spending our time in absorbing ourselves in Krsna, his activities and then glorifying those activities to the world. If that is what we would be doing, then everything would just become perfect.
But we have excuses. We say, “Yeah but I’m alone! I need companionship! I mean, if only I have companionship then I can do it but I’m alone!” What mundane companion can satisfy the heart? Since when has any mundane relationship ever satisfied the heart? Even the wives of demigods are not happy as described in Bhagavatam. They are enjoying on the banks of the heavenly Alakananda (river) and yet are still unfulfilled. If we are unfulfilled in our lives, we should not blame the external circumstances; we should blame our attachment to wanting the material circumstances to be according to the script that we have written.
We should rather just simply follow the path of Krsna, absorb ourselves in the activities of Krsna, just glorify Krsna and then everything becomes blissful. Then we will see whether we will be alone or not alone. The more one gets absorbed like that in Krsna consciousness, the more people will never leave one alone. See how many people are just looking at Srila Prabhupada for inspiration and turning to him constantly. Then, where is the question of loneliness? One who is with Krsna is never alone. I think this is one thing about Srila Prabhupada that sort of really stands out because he went all alone into those harsh conditions of New York but he was never alone. He was always very close to Krsna. So, that is the only way to actually be really happy.
Some people ask: “How can we find harmony among the many different spiritual paths?”
By looking beyond divergent ideas to convergent ideals, answers Gita wisdom.
The Bhagavad-gita (05.05) states that true seers see the same ultimate destination of the paths of sankhya (analytical contemplation) and yoga (detached action). Sankhya focuses on analyzing the material elements to progress towards the transcendental substance, spirit. In contrast, yoga focuses on action while fixing the mind on spirit and thereby cultivating inner detachment from matter.
People often talk of looking beyond externals to find commonalities. When we consider the paths of sankhya and yoga, not only are their externals different – one focuses on inaction; the other, on action. But even their internals are different: one stresses analysis; the other, meditation.
Gita wisdom helps us understand that there are levels in the internal too – there is the subtle material or mental level, where ideas reside; and beyond that is the spiritual level or the level of the heart, where ideals reside. To find the ultimate common ground, we need to go beyond not just the physical but also the mental – and there find the spiritual. Though the ideas of sankhya and yoga are different, their ideals are the same: both seek the same Absolute Truth.
Of course, this search for common ground doesn’t license an uncritical acceptance of all spiritual paths as equally valid. The paths need to have convergent ideals; otherwise, the common ground may be more an imagination than an insight. The Gita’s (09.25) delineation of different destinations for those with different ideals reflects a spiritual rigor that refuses to apply a naïve whitewash on all paths.
Still, in a world torn by sectarianism, the Gita’s inclusive spirit of focusing on ultimate ideals is a beacon that promotes authentic harmony.
***
05.05 - One who knows that the position reached by means of analytical study can also be attained by devotional service, and who therefore sees analytical study and devotional service to be on the same level, sees things as they are.
Yes, life will be peaceful when we trust our mind, relaxing and basking in it. Loosen the reins—in fact, drop them. After all, it's our very own mind, near and dear, worshipable and adorable. So my mind tells me.
Material existence, the Bhagavatam teaches, is a drama that happens through the mind. Fabricating superficial stuff known as happiness and distress, the mind drags us into one existential absorption after another, swinging us from body to body.
As Krishna explains in the Gita, higher than the mind is the intelligence, and higher still is the soul. Bhakti-yoga means to use the mind to think of Krishna and His service (the same) and to supervise the mind with its immediate superior——deliberative intelligence. Then gradually our real self the soul becomes uncovered, and as we become more advanced, the Supersoul begins to personally educate us.
On our way to Krishna, Sukadeva Goswami gives some crucial advice to bhakti practitioners:
"After capturing animals, a cunning hunter does not put faith in them, for they might run away. Similarly, those who are advanced in spiritual life do not put faith in the mind. Indeed, they always remain vigilant and watch the mind's action.
"All the learned scholars have given their opinion. The mind is by nature very restless, and one should not make friends with it. If we place full confidence in the mind, it may cheat us at any moment." (S. bhag 5.6.2-3)
Let's protest.
Isn't this warning mainly for new devotees, "new believers"? I've been around for a while now—time to just "let it be."
Give me a break, after all these years, I've internalized all the spiritual practices, so I don't have to be regular anymore. I just want to be a good human being, who does mostly as everyone does while believing, of course, in God, Krishna.
Foolish devotee, listen to Visvanath Cakravarti Thakur detail how the mind, like a chameleon, constantly assumes a new condition. One moment it flickers pure, the next, impure.
A cunning cheater shows friendship to trusting persons; then robs and kills them. Similarly the mind of the conditioned soul sometimes demonstrates its potential purity, shaking free of lust and anger, submitting to devotional activities. Eventually, one unsuspecting day, after the devotee has slackened and eased, suddenly the material mind storms back, betraying us, as we drown in a tsunami of material pollutants. Down goes the bhakti practioner.
Cakravartipada further enunciates how when long-term yogis maintain an ongoing faith in the mind, such trust and confidence will eventually reveal itself to have drained away their accumulated potencies, corroding their austerities. In time, the escalating ugly truth pounces, catching them completely off-guard.
Sukadeva Goswami (5.6.4-5) continues his crucial instruction:
"An unchaste woman is very easily carried away by paramours, and it sometimes happens that her husband is violently killed by her paramours. If the yogi gives his mind a chance and does not restrain it, his mind will give facility to enemies like lust, anger and greed, and they will doubtlessly kill the yogi.
"The mind is the root cause of lust, anger, pride, greed, lamentation, illusion and fear. Combined, these constitute bondage to fruitive activity. What learned man would put faith in the mind?"
We shall ignore this essential advice at our own peril.
Yes, life will be peaceful when we trust our mind, relaxing and basking in it. Loosen the reins—in fact, drop them. After all, it's our very own mind, near and dear, worshipable and adorable. So my mind tells me.
Material existence, the Bhagavatam teaches, is a drama that happens through the mind. Fabricating superficial stuff known as happiness and distress, the mind drags us into one existential absorption after another, swinging us from body to body.
As Krishna explains in the Gita, higher than the mind is the intelligence, and higher still is the soul. Bhakti-yoga means to use the mind to think of Krishna and His service (the same) and to supervise the mind with its immediate superior——deliberative intelligence. Then gradually our real self the soul becomes uncovered, and as we become more advanced, the Supersoul begins to personally educate us.
On our way to Krishna, Sukadeva Goswami gives some crucial advice to bhakti practitioners:
"After capturing animals, a cunning hunter does not put faith in them, for they might run away. Similarly, those who are advanced in spiritual life do not put faith in the mind. Indeed, they always remain vigilant and watch the mind's action.
"All the learned scholars have given their opinion. The mind is by nature very restless, and one should not make friends with it. If we place full confidence in the mind, it may cheat us at any moment." (S. bhag 5.6.2-3)
Let's protest.
Isn't this warning mainly for new devotees, "new believers"? I've been around for a while now—time to just "let it be."
Give me a break, after all these years, I've internalized all the spiritual practices, so I don't have to be regular anymore. I just want to be a good human being, who does mostly as everyone does while believing, of course, in God, Krishna.
Foolish devotee, listen to Visvanath Cakravarti Thakur detail how the mind, like a chameleon, constantly assumes a new condition. One moment it flickers pure, the next, impure.
A cunning cheater shows friendship to trusting persons; then robs and kills them. Similarly the mind of the conditioned soul sometimes demonstrates its potential purity, shaking free of lust and anger, submitting to devotional activities. Eventually, one unsuspecting day, after the devotee has slackened and eased, suddenly the material mind storms back, betraying us, as we drown in a tsunami of material pollutants. Down goes the bhakti practioner.
Cakravartipada further enunciates how when long-term yogis maintain an ongoing faith in the mind, such trust and confidence will eventually reveal itself to have drained away their accumulated potencies, corroding their austerities. In time, the escalating ugly truth pounces, catching them completely off-guard.
Sukadeva Goswami (5.6.4-5) continues his crucial instruction:
"An unchaste woman is very easily carried away by paramours, and it sometimes happens that her husband is violently killed by her paramours. If the yogi gives his mind a chance and does not restrain it, his mind will give facility to enemies like lust, anger and greed, and they will doubtlessly kill the yogi.
"The mind is the root cause of lust, anger, pride, greed, lamentation, illusion and fear. Combined, these constitute bondage to fruitive activity. What learned man would put faith in the mind?"
We shall ignore this essential advice at our own peril.
Recent pictures capture the progress of construction on two important parts of the new temple.
They showcase the headway being made in the South West corner. The staircase tower is moving forward as the shuttering of form work is being done. The next layer is concrete with the following layer will being the blue tiles. The planetarium wing is also making great strides in it’s momentum. One final ring needs to be done at which point the construction of the dome will commence.
There is still much to be done to complete the super-structure, but the on-going development is both exciting and encouraging.
The post October 2nd, 2013 – Darshan appeared first on Mayapur.com.
Video of Lakshmana dasi leading New Vrindaban’s 24 Hour Kirtan – June 15th, 2013.
Click here to view the video on YouTube.
SB 2.7.27: It’s impossible for anyone else to take the life of a huge demon, while just an infant; to kick over a big cart, while just three months old; or to uproot two huge arjuna trees just by crawling in between them.
There’s an obvious meaning here, and another, not-so-obvious one. The obvious one is that no ordinary human being can do these things. No ordinary infant can even protect itself, what to speak of kill a giant demon who attacks it. The cart was not a hand cart, it was like a child today kicking over a car. Not that dramatic, but similar – carts in those days were like cars. And Arjuna trees (Terminalia Arjuna) are notoriously tall (20-25 meters) and have very strong bases and roots.
The not-so-obvious meaning is that Brahmājī is not simply saying “no mortal can do this” – this śloka comes in the middle of a summary of avatāra - So, Brahmā is also saying, “no other avātar displays deeds as amazing as Krishna does.”
Viśvanātha Cakravartī elaborates: Vāmana was also a small child who defeated a huge, powerful demon – but he transformed into a huge, powerful form to do so. Krishna did not kill the giant Pūtana in this manner, he remained as a vulnerable infant. Why? It is more sweet. There is less awe and reverence. If Krishna transformed into a huge superhero to kill Pūtana, that would have intruded into the loving mood of his parents. He valued their love more than the killing of the demon, so he remained in the shape they adored, and coincidentally got the work done of getting rid of Pūtana in a beautiful way.
Nṛsiṁha kicked open a huge pillar – and Krishna kicked over a big cart. But Nṛsiṁha did so using huge, fearsome feet. Krishna kicked over the cart with the tiny foot of a three-month old child. Why? Same reason as explained above.
Varāha picked up the huge earth from the depths, but Krishna knocked down the huge trees and uprooted them from their depths. Varāha had to become a gigantic boar with huge, powerful tusks to accomplish his task, but Krishna didn’t have to become a gigantic boar, or even a huge super-baby to knock over these ultra-formidable trees. He just crawled in between them.
So, no other avatāra can match Krishna in sweetness.
Two ślokas later [2.7.29] Brahmā will mention how Krishna saved the Vrajavāsīs from a forest fire. To do this he had to do “godlike deeds” (divya karma), so he first instructed all the Vrajavāsīs to close their eyes, so as not to disturb the sweetness of their affection for him.
Govinda Prabhu (24hours kirtan iskcon vrindavan)
In Śrīmad Bhāgavatam 2.7.26, Brahmājī introduces the avatāra named “Krishna.” It is an exceedingly deep and wondrous śloka, so I would like to avail myself of the honor and pleasure of discussing it to some extent with those of you who might chance to happen upon this page.
bhūmeḥ suretara-varūtha-vimarditāyāḥ
kleśa-vyayāya kalayā sita-kṛṣṇa-keśaḥ
jātaḥ kariṣyati janānupalakṣya-mārgaḥ
karmāṇi cātma-mahimopanibandhanāni
To erase the Earth’s suffering from the burdensome hordes of vile schemes, the brilliantly-black Master of Pleasure, Krishna, appeared. His extraordinarily uncommon ways demonstrated the unsurpassable greatness of his being.
On the surface, this phrase (“Erasing the Earth’s suffering from the burdensome hordes of vile schemes” - bhūmeḥ suretara-varūtha-vimarditāyāḥ kleśa-vyayāya) refers to a proliferation of armies by ambitious, militaristic kings. The actual fruit inside the “banana peel” of this surface meaning, however, is that Krishna comes to erase the suffering we all cause to ourselves by proliferating our armies and armies of selfish schemes for self-centered happiness and enjoyment.
Selfishness, self-centeredness, is the core of all suffering – for it is antithetical to the essential nature of what we are (a small part of the glorious whole). Krishna’s avatāra has the specific purpose of destroying selfishness.
How?
The rest of the verse explains how.
Krishna erases our selfishness by showing us himself, the brilliant black Master of Pleasure. We are selfish because we have the misplaced notion that we will obtain pleasure by focusing on ourselves. Krishna’s avatāra, however, vividly demonstrates that we obtain unsurpassable pleasure by focusing on the glorious whole, Krishna – the brilliantly black Master of Pleasure.
This phrase, “Brilliantly-Black Master of Pleasure” is expressed in Sanskrit as sita-kṛṣṇa-keśa. In his commentary on this śloka, Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravatī discusses this phrase in detail. The main meanings of the words in this phrase are
sita: (1) bound/joined, (2) bright/white, (3) beautiful.
kṛṣṇa: (1) black, (2) the person Krishna
keśa: (1) hair, (2) emanating rays, (3) ka-īśa, the master of pleasure
So, the primary meaning is: Krishna, the bright-black master of pleasure. Another meaning is that Krishna has beautifully set, brilliantly black hair.
Another meaning can be taken if the phrase is not separated from the word that follows it: sita-kṛṣṇa-keśa jātaḥ. Now, the phrase can mean “born from white and black hairs.” Viśvanātha Cakravartī discusses this at length. He cites Viṣṇu Purāṇa and Mahābhārata which describe Krishna and Balarāma as expanding from a white and black hair that Mahā-Viṣṇu (the Puruṣa, and source-via-medium for all avatāra) pulled from his body.
The Ṭhākura makes the point that Viṣṇu has jet black hair, because he never ages. His hair does not grey. Thus the “white hair” cannot be seen as a “grey hair” in that sense. The hair may be white because it comes from a unique part of his body, perhaps the śrīvatsa. This is my own timid suggestion as to where the “white hair” of the ever-youthful puruṣa may come from. Viśvanātha suggests that the one hair was not “white” but “brilliant” (sita). Viṣṇu pulled out two hairs, one of them glimmered brilliantly indicating the white color of Balarāma. He references Śrīla Sanātana Goswāmī’s Laghu-Bhāgavatāmṛta and Śrīla Jīva Goswāmī’s Kṛṣṇa-Sandarbha which support the conclusion that the idea of Viṣṇu having grey hair is a mistake, that his hair is brilliantly black, and beautifully bound into topknots and other wonderful styles.
The phrase in this śloka, sita-kṛṣṇa-keśa is an indirect reference to the circumstantial “origin” of Krishna and Balarama’s avatar, but much more directly it is a description of the beauty of Krishna – the beauty which attracts our hearts away from the ugliness of selfishness, the beauty of the brilliantly black Master of Pleasure, Krishna.
Krishna’s avatāra is for the purpose of erasing the armies of vile selfish desires burdening our hearts. He wipes out these armies by being so beautiful and blissful (sita-kṛṣṇa-keśa). How does he display his blissful beauty?
He displays (kariṣyati) his heart-stealing beauty in “extraordinarily uncommon ways” (janānupalakṣya-mārga). This is really a beautiful phrase, and reveals the intimate connection between the motive of the Krishna avatāra and the motive of the subsequent Krishna-Caitanya avatāra. Krishna will do things, will behave in ways (mārga) that the people of this world have never seen before (jana-anupalakṣya). This unconventional, unprecedented behavior of Krishna, what does it do (karmāṇi)? It “demonstrates the unsurpassable glory of his being” (ātma-mahima upanibandhanāni).
Krishna attracts our hearts away from their stubborn fixation on selfishness by demonstrating the unsurpassable glory his being. So, he displays the unparalleled bliss of the Master of Pleasure. How? By showing us a glimpse of true pleasure, and thus demonstrating ways of life that human beings simply have not even imagined possible. This refers directly and explicitly to his unmatchably sweet interactions with his mother, with his friends, and with his lovers, whose enchanting attractiveness far surpasses any earthly supermodel, any heavenly courtesan of paradise, any manifestation of master goddesses, any Lakṣmī in Vaikuṇṭha, and even any Divine Queen of the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
The epitome of what this phrase refers to is the rāsa-līlā and the events and circumstances which lead up to and support it. The main essence of the reason for Krishna’s avatāra is to give us a small glimpse of the pristine and compellingly captivating beauty and pleasure overflowing from the pure divine love expressed romantically in the exquisite setting of the Rāsa Dance. By receiving a glimpse of that divine dance – provided that we are not cursed by some vile misunderstanding of it – the focus of our hearts will be forcefully abducted from our vile armies of selfish schemes, and thrown completely to focus selflessly upon, in any small way, enhancing and augmenting the unparalleled pleasure effusing abundantly from sweet, romantic divine love, epitomized in the Rāsa Dance.