Hi, Ananga. How are you? Hi, Gayatri. Nice to see you again. Nice to see you too.
The other day, I was having a conversation with one of the students from a UC university, and he’s a wonderful spiritual practitioner, very disciplined in his regular spiritual practice, has wonderful questions, thinks beyond himself, wants to do a lot for the community and society, and really kind hearted soul. He asked me whether spirituality is can be just left at being personal, like an individual practice, Or is it a necessity that one should join an institution, become a part of a society or a movement or a community? Even though he likes associating with other like minded people. But at the same time, he feels really afraid of becoming getting into the system of bureaucracy and becoming a part of an institution. So I was thinking we can speak with one of our very renowned speakers.
He has been a practitioner of bhakti yoga. In fact, a teacher of bhakti yoga for almost three decade. He speaks at prestigious universities, speaks at the TED and the peace conference. He has authored over 30 books. It is such an honor to have you here, Chaitanya Charan, Prabhu.
Thank you so much for joining us. Thank you, Prabhu, for joining us. One of your Guided to be here. Thank you for inviting. Great that you have started this podcast.
The podcast space is something which is expanding rapidly, and it’s a very human way to get in touch with people. And we do have some devotees doing podcast, but they’re mainly mails. It’s good that question that we are taking the lead. Hello? All the best and your service.
Thank you. Thank you so much. Thank you so much for your encouragement. And I was just sharing that one of the books that I daily refer to is Yogita daily and the inspirational quote. It’s something that I look at every single day and, seek inspiration.
It’s just amazing how you’ve been able to pull out such practicality in such an artistic, I would say, linguistic form from the Bhagavad Gita. It’s truly inspirational. So thank you so much again for joining us. Thank you, Prabhu, for joining us. We were just talking about I think Gayathri was mentioning that one of this one of she goes to one of the UC universities, and one of the students asked this very profound, thought provoking question.
And we just wanted to start from there that people say these days that I’m spiritual, but not religious. I don’t need a system. It’s between me and the supreme or it’s my it’s my personal practice. So it sounds appealing, Prabhu. What’s the right balance?
I wouldn’t say one versus the other. How do we align both individuality and the practice, as an institution in an association together. Yeah. I think that’s a question which comes up in everyone’s mind sooner or later. I’ll answer this from three perspectives.
First is more of a personal journey I’ll talk about. Second, then talk more from a philosophical perspective, and then I’ll talk of it from a cultural perspective. So, personally, I have been always more of a introvert, and I always work alone. Even in college, when I used to do research or write any papers, I was always friendly with people, but I just couldn’t work with people. So friends would call me, tease me, they would call me, you’re a lone wolf.
That’s right. So when I joined the Ashram in Pune, at that time, we had three rooms and the 90 of us staying in three rooms. Oh, we were always 90. For. We couldn’t spend.
The one we were That’s the hardest thing for which one. So I was 12 of us would sleep inside the rooms, and then others would sleep outside in the atrium at various places. So I initially thought this was just a this was just what Krishna consciousness meant. And, of course, in the spiritual life also, there is what I like to call as the honeymoon phase of Krishna consciousness. Very good.
Because everything is so new, and we have a sense of spirit of adventure. So we just can do a lot of things that are not sustainable in the long run. So for the first few years, I just this is what means that there was the initial real law being a part of a mission. But over a over a number of years, I started noticing that it requires you need your own space. Initially, it was almost as if I was made to feel guilty, not that anybody was intentionally doing that.
But It was just it would happen. And one of my services is writing, and writing requires concentration and very difficult to concentrate when there are so many people around. Yes. And So then slowly, I started associating with devotees who were writing. Now almost everybody many devotees are writing books.
We have culture of literary continuation of the tradition is really picking up. But in those times, 02/2003, ‘2 thousand ‘4, hardly anyone was writing. So authors were far and few. So I started connecting with authors, and they said, yes. We need space.
And that’s when, actually, I was introduced to the idea of finding our space according to our nature in Krishna consciousness. So slowly then, I started also seeking my space a little bit, insisting unapologetically doing that. And now so from that perspective, anybody who is a little more on the creative side will need space. That’s just the way artwork, creativity works. I find that within an institution, art, you could say science also has science or something like engineering or something mechanical.
You know, this is the process. Follow the process. There is not much individuality in that. But when we are doing anything artistic, there is definitely individuality. So we are going to record they’ll address the deities.
There are some standard rules to follow in addressing the deities. But if we make everything rule bound, then every day the deity would have exactly the same, and there will no room for individuality. Mhmm. So, like, that room for individuality is very much needed. And we could say, Bhakti is a relationship with Krishna, and a relationship is a personal one to one relationship.
And I’m going for the personal and the philosophical. So from personal perspective, I did recognize the need for it myself, and I’ll come back to the portal towards the end once again. And feel free to interrupt anytime you want to comment or reflect or anything or anything is not clear. I I actually really appreciated how you mentioned. You’re especially giving the example of dressing the deities because I love dressing the deities, and that was one of my primary services when I lived in New Vrindavan.
And it we still look forward to this different flavors, and flavors is the spice of lunch. Even like we’ve hear in the scriptures that Srimati Radharani, she cook for Krishna and not one item is repeated. And naturally, there is variety in personalities, in different kinds of emotions, there is variety. So spirituality includes variety. And if if we don’t facilitate that, then somewhere we’re failing as an society or we’re failing as a community to fan that spark in each and every one of us, maybe intentionally or unintentionally.
So it really resonated with your point. Thank you so much for so simply simplifying the need for diversity. And that’s actually one of our strengths actually within our ISKCON society, the diversity that we have. So now from the philosophical perspective, as I mentioned, it’s a relationship. And relationship is essentially True.
At the same time, within the philosophy, within the tradition, there’s an emphasis on association, and it’s considered almost, impossible thing to try to practice bhakti without association. So the tradition is called not just. Is do it with others. Is such an important part. So, eventually, when a group of individuals who want to the shared purpose and the shared values that are characteristic of those who are the.
And they come together. They may create some infrastructure, some resources for the systematic or smooth the sync of their bank. And those consolidated resources that are created become the what we call as an organization. So, essentially, an organization could say the formalization of the facilities and resources for a community to practice the spiritual life. And within that, philosophically, we could say that while within the Indian tradition again, how do you define an organization and institution itself is a philosophical issue?
Some people may consider even marriage to be an institution. And, yes, it’s an institution, but then it’s required. The most fundamental institution required for society. So school is an institution. The one place is an institution.
So in that sense, institutions are just part of the structuring of life. So some structure is required. Now within the philosophy itself is the fact that there are three modes of material nature, and we will explore that a little bit later. But so when the organization is formed, organization is basically you could say material. But deal in the sense that it is formed in the material world using material resources.
It may be for a spiritual purpose, but it’s formed in the material world. So it’s like the example I like is there’s a trickle of water and the top of mountain which wants to go to the ocean. That trickle of water wanting to go all along to the ocean. It may be very difficult for it to get all the way down to the ocean. Right.
It it combines with other trickles of water. It becomes a tributary, and then it combines to become a river. And the river can flow toward the ocean much more easily. And future drops of water or trickles of water that come in, they will move forward because of the flow of the river. And as the river keeps flowing so the river is like the commune.
River is like the community or the society. Nowadays, the word society has many meanings. Community is a more popular word or a more sweet sounding word, you could say. But when started, he did not start the international organization or institution of Krishna conscious. Started the international society.
So it’s an interesting usage of word. But the river flowing is like the community. Now as the river keeps flowing, it forms a bed. And then that bed is meant to enable the river to keep flowing more smoothly in the future. But once a bed is formed, then it may well happen that people may come and form a dam on the way.
They are not interested in going to the ocean. They are interested in using the water for their own purposes. So So If it were just a river, okay, that’s there. But once the bed is formed, then it becomes predictable. The river is always going to go in this direction.
And that’s when dams are formed. So the dam is like the diversion of spiritual resources for nonspiritual purposes. Mhmm. That’s what can happen, and that’s where people start feeling, oh, this is becoming too ritualistic. This is becoming too materialistic.
This is becoming too calculative. What a fantastic example. Can happen. So I would say, in principle, the institution or some kind of formalization of the structure and the infrastructure necessary. But it comes with inherent dangers, and one needs to be aware of those dangers.
So having said that, we’ll come back to how to address the dangers a little later. We’ll let me complete that. Now from a cultural perspective, I was born and brought up in India. I was introduced to a few also in India. The first almost twenty years of my spiritual life was in India.
Last ten years, I’ve been spending more than only every six or more months outside India. And I have interacted with a lot of non Indian mainly in America, but Europe and Australia, New Zealand also. And, overall, there is also a significant difference in ethos. In India is still a more conservative country. America, any other western world is much more liberal.
And one aspect of how this plays out is in the attitude towards authority. In India, our regional and eastern cultures, where the culture is a little more hierarchical and more conservative, if somebody’s in authority position by default, there is respect for authority. Now, of course, if the authority behaves in inappropriate ways, obnoxious ways, that respect may be lost. Right. By default, there is a spirit for authority.
In the West, this applies in general and all the more super religious authority. By default, there is skepticism and suspicion to all the power. And in general, there’s a long history about it. It’s not that respect is not there, but respect cannot be assumed because of there being a position of authority. Respect has to be owed.
And in that sense, for the western mind to associate spirituality with the institution, with the structures of power, with these hierarchies, and authority figures becomes a bit something which I don’t want. We could go specifically into why this has happened. I think there are three reasons. One is the Catholic church was a very rigid system of authority. I mean, the American the original Americans who came to India, they came with the very came to America, what they or that time, it is the land of what they consider the Indians.
Yes. So they came to break free from the rigid authority structure of the church. So in that sense, America began itself as a statement against any centralized authority. And the second is that, also, within the very nature of how America is how America is politically is a confederation, not a federation. Like, the states come together and the states give power to the center.
India is a penetration where the center use power to the states. Center is much more poor. So that whole idea work historically into the religion, into the politics. And America is more the idea of the rugged individual fighting it alone. The pioneer years are the people who will still inspire Americans.
It’s not being the historic conscious historical memory, but the idea is I want to do my own thing. So because of all these factors, institutionalized spirituality does Come with a red signal. It is as in today’s language, we call it trigger warning. It’s something we do not want. Carries a lot of baggage already from the history.
Prabhu, Adnan, I want to go back to your ocean, the analogy for trickles of water. Like, initially, you said we all have a honeymoon period in our bhakti, which we all did. We overshadowed all the attention. We were we were so enthusiastic to do so much service, and then you mentioned a very profound thing that Bhakti is a relationship. So that means Bhakti is not people think that spirituality can be a presentation.
Outwardly, everything looks good. So spirituality is not a presentation. Spirituality is our relationship with ourself, with the divine. With this analogy, I was thinking, like, trickles of water. So one trickling of water is each trickling of water is the individual part, our individuality.
So some some people might think, okay. The ocean current will come, like, in our institution. We can have program. We can have festivals. We can move from one year to the other celebrating together, but still not advanced.
Like So there are times when we may have to make our decision individually also. And so in life, when we face crisis, it could be a crisis of finances, crisis of health, be a crisis of fee. At that time, we won’t be able to just go along because the river is there. Oh, so in one sense, while we are in the reverse flow may push us along, but life is also flowing along, and life may push us keep pushing us out of the river. And it’s not just something like pushes out of the river.
Within the currents of the river, it’s just sometimes flow push something out of the river also. The river tends to overflow. So we often ask people who come new to what how do you come to Krishna? That’s an important question. But if you really want to get honest with people, the change the question asks is, why did you stay in Krishna?
That’s true. That’s true. And also we’re more interested. And so I think the individual intention is something which is important. Well, is we who are to develop our relationship.
And that’s why when somebody has some issues with the institution, everybody will because that’s just the nature of the world. Often, the way I phrase it is that the institution is not source of our spirituality. It is a resource for our spirituality. Beautiful. It is a resource, and I will consider it invaluable and sometimes even indispensable resource.
But it’s a resource. It’s our responsibility to grow spiritual. In that sense, it’s like like a university. You are still employed lots of facility to study, which we were to study. It’s like a stock exchange that we can earn money over there, but it’s our money, and it’s our responsibility.
Now we may invest the money with some strong broker, and that person may invest somewhere. But ultimately, the loss is going to come to us, not to that person. So in that sense, the individual intention and individual responsibility are never lost. And that is one of years that people have, also some of the unfortunate reality that happens that we may outsource the responsibility of our spiritual growth Yeah. To the institution.
Yeah. In the name of association, we sometimes outsource as well. Like, if I’m going if I’m with devotees, I’ll advance. If I am yeah. If I’m chanting in a group, I’ll chant well.
But what is my individual responsibility? Just so I really like that that but they cannot be outsourced always. That’s so beautiful. I think, what you really have emphasized here is the balance. The balance, and there is that serenity prayer that says that to know the difference or to understand when you actually need the associate to progress and make progress and uplift yourself with encouragement and with association.
At the same time, you need those quiet moments where you are diving deeper. So that balance between being a part of an institution and so you don’t you don’t start outsourcing it completely. But at the same time, you do need that community spirit. At the same time, you do need that pace for internal growth, and how those two can tie in together is what actually makes it really healthy. In fact, his holiness, Radhanath Swami, had once told me in a brief conversation, and I think this was also when I had a little child.
And all of a sudden, I felt everybody was just moving ahead, and my life came to a complete that formal moment when you feel like you’re moving moving out. You’re like you’re you’re tied in within a little child, which you absolutely love. Within a few moments, it’s like you’re communicating with an individual that is not communicating back with you. For a very long period of time till the child actually starts to express and reciprocate and you’re just, like, giving on the giving, giving, giving, giving end night and day. And along with the hormones going up and down, you come to a point in a feeling that everyone is moving ahead, and you your life is just like you’re not making any progress.
And at that time, I think I expressed something to Radhanath Swami, and he said something beautiful. He said, you need to be like an eagle. He said, if you learn the art of balancing have you noticed how an eagle flies? He doesn’t fly. He glides.
And he said, if you wanna fly high and for an extended period of time, then you need to learn the art of balance. So there were moments where you could drop everything and just run and do and take inspiration from every single nook in corner. Now is the time that you use for your internal growth. At read. Develop this wonderful relationship with the soul that Krishna has put onto your care.
And it it was just something so beautiful that the art of balancing is such an important aspect of even our own spiritual journey that you’ve been emphasizing here. Thank you for reminding us that. Thank you for clearing that. And it was in reference to balance. I like to use the acronym one for this.
The one who is thinking that the institution is the only way. And that is the other is never the way. If you are a part of the institution, you can never be spiritual. You just need caught in existence. What is oh, and he is the it’s efficient to me.
Now it’s efficient to me. Come up with this from Yeah. I think he just came up with it. Have the the affect whatever what you want to use for it. But I find that, all the extremes have to be avoided.
And each individual will need to find their way to relate with the institution. How close, how far your example of having a maybe is a very good example, I would say. Institutional conceptions of spiritual growth will not be able to accommodate this at all. Because by its very nature, an institution is a tangible thing. And while it’s a tangible thing, it will always look for tangible things Yes.
As markers or atmospheres of success and growth. True. Yes. So that’s just the way an institution will work. Somebody is a serious practitioner.
What is the parameter? Okay. How often do you come to the temple? How regular is your dentist? How much is the responsibility you are taking in the temple?
Or Mhmm. Would have okay how many rounds are you chanting? Or we have our specific parameters. They are important in their own way. At the same time, there are real life.
It’s not just filled with tangible. When you sing, even with daily life, you cannot use tangibles. People think money is the source of all happiness. Money is a very tangible thing. But then it’s important, but life is much more about things that are not so tangible.
So if we consider Krishna consciousness is the expansion of our consciousness outside of ourselves to take care of someone else, ultimately to care for Krishna. So recently, my brother had a baby and his baby was a COVID baby, so there’s nobody to help. And I’ve seen my brother change in the three years, three, four years since he had a baby, the amount of responsibility and selflessness and maturity that he has developed, it’s remarkable. And in general, if we consider the point of the expansion of consciousness, then caring for other human being, that actually expands our consciousness. And if we are already in a devotional frame of mind, then while we are caring for other human being, we’ll be doing that caring in a devotional way with prayer, with the service attitude.
But this is not something which can be tangibly measured. So within the institutional infrastructure, if we consider one of the limbs of Bhakti, that is. Sharing one’s heart and confidence and hearing others share their heart and confidence. This is not something which can be institutionally mandated or evaluated. The other two parameters, we could say Giving gifts, giving food.
As hospitality, that culture of caring. That’s something too much so tangible. It can be more easily done, and we can also tell you do this. But that’s why I have found that within an institution, there are two kinds of leaders. There are project builders, and there are community builders.
Mhmm. And you require almost a opposite profile for these two things. There are very few leaders who can actually do both. Project builders are those who will build the infrastructure. They will have huge temples.
They will have huge more distribution. They will have huge farm communities. So they will so that is project building, and that’s very important. But community building is more about sitting down with people, connecting with their hearts. So in my understanding, if you look at life, the ten years when he was traveling, that’s more like project building.
And the late in eighteen years when he was in Poree, he was actually community building. He was there, just entering into the hearts of his intimate associates. And even those who are from Vrindavan, they would come and meet him, Rupa Goswami, Swami, all the Goswamis. In one sense, Mahaprabhu, we could have said he could have preached so much by traveling. Could reach so many more people.
He was reaching to the hearts of those whom he had already reached. And so both are required. The problem is community building, it’s the results are become tangible after a long time. It takes a long time for the effort results to crystallize into something which is tangibly measurable or visible. So I think that’s the main danger of the institution that the institution may start devaluing the intangibles because they are not measurable.
And that’s when the if the intangibles are too devalued, then that institution will become more and more materialistic rather than remaining a spiritual institutional purpose. So I was just saying that, yes, I’ve seen greatest leaps made by new parents like you were saying, and we were even we were sharing our experience by parents and new mothers when they have to hit a pause in the institutional phase of their life and go deep. And I think even I have made a lot of personal progress when I couldn’t do any more services. I could only establish a relationship with my daughter and really in the quiet moments of my time, just go deep. Just, introspect where am I heading.
It’s been fifteen years I’ve been chanting. So just measuring my progress, not in the tangible sense, but really internally knowing what is it that I’m heading towards. What’s my goal? Was it what’s what is really that I want between me and the supreme? So I really resonate with that, that institution definitely holds a play.
And I on the flip side, I also wanted to ask you, Prabhu, that, yes, we talk about the the community, the association aspect that an institution provides. But also, like, going back when we started when we just started talking, Gayatri was mentioning that there’s a student and he says, why do I be a part of a movement and not just be a person of my own? But if we also go astray the other end, that just I’m just an individual. I’m just a spiritual person. We can be whimsical.
Right? Like, a spiritual organization helps in preserving the tradition, the I’m passing down the teachings. Isn’t that true, or can that be done in a personal aspect as well? Yeah. One of the things which I have found is that rather than considering a spiritual organization to be one homogeneous unit.
Mhmm. We can see that it is a network of many heterogeneous units with a harmonious purpose. That means that when I travel across the world, I noticed that each temple has its own mood, its own emphasis. The temple the project is made in the image of the leader, whether it’s the president, whether it’s the spiritual master, whether it’s a previous leader whose shadow is still extending over the project. The so the way Hishla Prabhupada made the moment was also quite decentralized.
We have the GBC, but he wanted each temple to have a lot of autonomy by which they could grow based on their initiative. So just as we could have various physical temples, which are autonomous in their own way and which will each of them have their own mood. So I feel similarly, devotees also need to have a network of like minded devotees. And this is not just a psychological, it’s a devotional principle. That we want association, which is of the same category.
Those like minded devote. So Yeah. Why I’m a little more analytical intellectual. So I find that I look forward to the association of people who are similarly intellectual. We get into the technicalities of things, and we delight in those technicality.
And although, generally, my role is answering questions, but even when I’m answering a question on someone, my mind is questioning my answer. And even if the audience doesn’t question the answer, I’m questioning it. Mhmm. See, I need to think about this. Maybe this point needs to be addressed.
So I have a lot of questions, and I voice them with my intellectual friends. And then we see, okay. How will we answer this? Do we have some scriptural references? Do we have some traditional perspectives?
Do we have any contemporary insights? So each one of us will need to find that like minded association also. Say somebody is into music, then they may wanna go deep into music. The general devotee community may not want to go that much deep into music. This year, this couple of days ago, I was talking with one young girl.
Young means young adult now. So she was saying that she’s trained in music. And in the community, it is that everybody should allow to do Kirtan, but everybody can’t do Kirtan. So she’s she was telling me that for me, when I find Kirtan is a tension between the spiritual joy and the musical annoyance. That’s a classic example.
I mean, I totally can relate to that. It’s so beautiful. Actually, there was someone mentioning the other day that it was a Hindi joke, but I’m gonna say it anyway. A very famous singer, he was actually sharing with Gaurang Prabhu. He said that he said, you make the lord.
You torture the lord the most by putting anyone before him to sing. Everyone that comes to your temple, you put him before the lord to sing. That will be resonates. But, yeah, that is definitely so true that devotee is actually feeling. But I think she’ll be able to tolerate what is happening in the temple if she has that support group where she can do a little deep dive into her interests connected to Krishna’s spirituality.
So I would say the same thing would apply to something like a mother also. Those who are young mothers, they they have some sort of community of those who are in the similar phase or gone through a similar phase. From the institution’s perspective, what you are doing at that time may not be very valuable because it’s important. It may not be valued immediately, but there is a lot of depth of immersion of consciousness that can come while doing that particular service. And that’s why like minded association is, I feel, an underemphasized principle.
Let’s talk about association, but we need to talk about like minded association. And when we have that, then the institution will not seem that supplicating for individual. So going back to the answer to the starting question, we just need to find like minded mentors, like minded friends, like minded community. Now it may not be an entire community. Nowadays, it’s social media on WhatsApp and other places.
We can form our own communities also, like minded people. But at least a few friends. The spirituality is definitely about developing our personal relationship with Krishna. At the same time, it is very difficult to two things, I find. One is to maintain the motivation all alone Because Krishna is not visible for us, we cannot directly interact with them.
And anytime the nature of the world is that in this world, Krishna is invisible and my eyes are visible. So because of that, alone to maintain our motivation is difficult. And even if somebody is strong enough, maybe they have done a lot of spirituality in their previous life because of it, they have the motivation. But still, spiritually, growth can become a very lonely thing. If we are serious about growing spiritually, then often the values we live by are different from or even somewhat opposite to the values the mainstream society is going to live by.
So then whom are we going to talk with? Whom are we gonna share our heart? Just saying that spirituality is just a personal thing. I don’t need an institution. Fair enough.
But you may not need an institution. You need what the institution offers. And the institution offers a community to us. It offers a association. So that’s why If one has like minded association, then the individual in the guidance of like minded devotees can decide how strongly they identify with which aspect of this.
But the ins We all have, you could say, a social identity, but we also have a psychological identification. That means, say, now we are all Indians over here. Mhmm. When we were in India, we probably didn’t we’re not so conscious we are Indians. No.
We are just India. That’s that’s that’s identity, but psychologically, we will not think about it. It’s only when the cricket match is going on and Pakistan and that India. That time we think I will. Yes.
But when we come to America, then we are consciously reminded. Yeah. Oh, I’m Indian over here. And we may even become American citizens. But still, we are ethnically Indian.
There is a social identity and a psychological identification. And these two are different things. So Mhmm. The social identity so each of us has different roles. So for example, I’m a monk, and most people see me personally as a monk.
But that’s a very small part of my personal psychological identity. I see myself more as a author, a thinker, a teacher. That I happen to be a monk. Second, it’s a minor thinker. So so we have a social identification.
We have a social identity, and we have a psychological identification. So the social identity may come to some extent because you join an general institution. Or we are a part of the we take a way of the resources provided by the institution. How much psychologically we identify with it and with which aspects of it we identify, that’s something which each individual needs to decide. And they need the space to decide that.
At the same time, they need also the guidance to be able to decide that. That’s why like minded association is very important. Such a beautiful thing and such a simple way you have decoded it, I feel. And the very fact that you said that we don’t have to look at an institution as one huge body. It’s actually support groups, different support groups that have come together.
And even so beautifully, you explained that every temple or every community that you go to when you’ve traveled to different parts within one institution can have different flavors because of who’s leading, what their what their mood of service is. And that is all variety. That is all variety, and we can find our own safe space. And we could have few different you I was listening to one relationship podcast recently, and he was actually mentioning he said that when you have one partner, if you’re going to feel and think that you wanna do everything with just this one person, you’re going to feel incomplete because that one person has his own need and his has his own liking. But at the same time, if there is major portion of shared responsibilities of certain things that you like to do together, and there’s going to be certain things that you like to do with someone else.
Like, you go with a friend if you like to listen to some music, and your partner is really not interested in music. But you want to develop this real deep taste and you’re feeling like, oh, you know what? He’s got different interests and I’ve got different interests. Let’s just end this. No.
Because one person is not competent to fulfill all your needs and similarly for the other person. So when we find our different support groups for our different needs, at the same time, it helps us become loyal in a way that when I say loyal to the practice of spirituality, loyal to continuing with this journey with support from wherever we need it. And I think you really elaborated that so beautifully. Completely decoded it for me. I don’t know how you feel, Ananga, but it was just I am I’m, like, going over with so many things, like community, like, our institution is not the source.
Like, initially, when I started out out as a devoting, I’m like, yeah. It’s everything. And it is everything because it’s giving me all the resources that I need to move forward. So I love that analogy, Prabhu, that I love that the wordplay that you do, that institution is not the source. It’s the resource.
And just one one thing that came up to my mind was on service. Like, when we do our services and, initially, we start out on doing a lot of service, the institution driven services, and we try to measure our growth according to that. But how many services are we doing? Are we going to the temple doing the services? But then when the shift comes to personal growth, purifying the heart, then those services those kind of services, we balance it out with going deeper.
So when someone really asks, like, how do I measure my spiritual progress? How do I measure that I’m really purifying my heart? Institutional Seva might not be just enough equal equal to your spiritual growth. How do we measure our growth? How do we measure our progress?
Really then, like, taking into consideration that we talk talked about tangible plus the intangible. So how does someone in their loan time measure their intangible progress as well? I I’m not sure whether there’s any clear answer. I can always give a scriptural answer that there is the we could say the answer is that how much are we attached to Krishna and how much are we attached from That when we experience Krishna through the practice of, then that experience is so enriching that we no longer feel grieving for other experiences. That would be a broad parameter of spiritual growth that our attraction to Krishna increases.
This is what I want to experience more and more. Other things, they don’t matter so much. So this is more like a philosophical parameters for spiritual advancement. Now beyond the spiritual paradigm we could say now, which is parent doesn’t no long definitely important. But this is quite abstract or rather not abstract.
It is intangible. You can see it in vertical ways, so then there’ll be institutional parameter for spiritual growth. So I generally respect to parameters. I as you may notice, I like acronyms. I think in terms of acronyms.
The acronym I have for this is a simple wisdom. There are spiritual parameters. I mean, then there are institutional parameters. So institutional parameters could be how much service the person is doing, how many rounds somebody is chanting, how often does the person come to the temple, how do they come for the morning program, do they themselves do a morning program, in their community where they are. So there are institutional parameters.
And, generally, the institutional parameters have centered on three things. How many temples are built, how many books are distributed, and how many devotees are made. Now these they are important parameters. I wouldn’t say they are an exhaustive list of parameters, And every institution may also change based on time, place, and candidate. What is their emphasis at that particular time in the growth of the community and the growth of the project over there.
But the institution will have its parameters. And the final is we have to have our personal parameter. The personal does not mean that you’re divorced from the the this will give us some institutional or the spiritual, but each of us has certain challenges we are facing. And sometimes it may happen that, of course, there is this whole phenomena of spiritual bypassing where we use God to stay away from God. That means I feel very angry with some sibling, with a spouse, with some other community member.
And instead of dealing with that anger, I chant 64 round. I chant one twenty eight rounds. So we just come for mediation. I’ll spend this one hour in mediation. I’ll chant eight rounds.
And 10 rounds I’ll chant. That’ll lead to much more spiritual growth. This is a very reductionistic way of con you’re considering spiritual growth. Maybe Krishna is speaking to you something through your anger. Mhmm.
Is it that Krishna is accessible only to the holy name and not to anything else at all? So we have to have personal parameters also. Personal means, what the person takes as important as well as what is specific the person. Others may realize that person may not realize immediately. So personal parameters means if you see when was asked what what how do we know your disciples and apply to all his followers?
He said that they are perfect gentlemen and ladies. Now what that means is person should be well behaved. Person should be cultured. Person should be somebody which others would like to be with. So if we consider the twelfth chapter from text 13 to 20 in the Bhagavad Gita, Krishna is talking about qualities that endure and devotee to him.
And when he’s talking about these, not one of these qualities is associated with the devotional activity. Krishna does not say somebody who passed on Ekadashi, somebody who chants 16 rounds before taking a sip of water. Somebody every day. None of these. Krishna is talking about.
Talking mostly about behavioral qualities rather than devotional activities. Why? Because these are also important. Mhmm. And sometimes they may get devalued.
And this does not mean devotional activities are not important. Of course, they’re important. But at the same time, this change also needs to be Is the person becoming kinder? Is the person becoming less judgmental? Is the person becoming more are they becoming more resilient in terms of facing criticism or facing reversals?
The quality that I described are very universally appealing. So I think each one of us need to see. We want to become grow spiritually. We wanna become better devotees, but we also need to become better human beings. We’re better I wanna become better person.
And what does that mean for me? And how much is my spirituality helping me to do that? Or how much am I doing that with my spiritual path? That’s why all these three parameters, the spiritual parameters, the parameters, and the personal parameters will need to be considered. I think I have the big sip of wisdom here that you just forget.
Thank you very much. It was enlightening. That is so beautiful. Actually, I was reading in the book, and he talks about he says that spiritual life is all about transformation. So what becomes significant, you once you’re practicing spiritual life, you realize what is really important and what can just be background.
What’s the focus of your spiritual journey, and what is just a painting, a detail in the background. And that could vary for individual to a certain extent. And he really mentioned he gives us example about a good test is when you’re squeezed. You put into some trying situation. You have this wonderful example.
He said, if you squeeze an orange, what are you going to get? You’re gonna get orange juice. You cannot expect the leachie juice or a mango juice. You’re gonna get orange juice. So in trying circumstances, when we are really put into difficult situations, when we are tested, at that time, we kind of realize what we’ve been cultivating within our hearts.
If we’re at a slight provocation, we’re only getting angry. If we’re getting frustrated, we’re getting dejected. If we’re becoming depressed, uninspired, then that’s what we’ve been cultivating throughout. He said, so every time we’re squeezed, we wanna check for the quality of the nectar that’s coming out. If it’s orange juice, if it’s mango juice.
So I think trying situations are difficult. Circumstances that we had put through actually give us an insight of the growth that we’ve made. That’s the interesting. Well, you’re my contact. Recently, I was standing from one place to another, and I only travel deep fruits.
It is a long flight. So somebody gave me some apple, and then I tried to chew it, and it turned out to be potato. That That’s not true. Genetically change. Oh my god.
So then it took like it happened. I don’t know how that happened. How this happened so hard to to the. So so one food can be put on another fruit, but when you squeeze it and you chew it with content, at that time, actually, what is the real thing comes out? Yeah.
And that’s that’s that that Radha also likes to code operator. One’s greatness is seen, and one’s capacity to all great provoking situations. Mhmm. I’m just also thinking about Yeah. That’s the important thing.
Now within an institutional parameter, this will not be really seen so much. But it’s so important for not just one individual to not just blow off the handle, but also for a community to, not overreact to whatever incidental problem that come inevitably. So that’s a good example of the transformation being in terms of when we are squeezed. Wow. Yeah.
There was another thing that This can be taken to another extreme. I was in one country, and then they had a very strict leader. And that leader would intentionally squeeze people. He said, I want to push you through a hole so small. Only your soul will go, and none of your ego will go through it.
So I don’t think That’s nonsense. I don’t think that’s an approach to an activity. No. So squeezing is something which your life will do. We should not be doing it to each other.
Yeah. Perfect. That is so true. Actually, I was having a conversation with, one of my teenage boys was kinda trying to work out his plan of how prevalent specifically was trying to work out his plan of how he wants to do his medical, what he really wants to do, what classes he needs to take. And I was just reflecting.
I said, if I’m really serious, this boy is trying to get a medical degree, and he’s figuring out what he really needs to do. He needs to do two classes of that, five classes of this, how he can and he’s organizing his life and his brain and his activities to align with his goal. And it just hit me that if I’m really serious about spiritual life, am I really sitting down and chalking out a plan that this is where I want to be five years from now. And what can I really do to facilitate and enhance my experience in in spiritual life to and how many times do we really take the time to sit down and chalk this whole thing out to at least a certain degree? Like, okay.
I’m really intellectually, like, for you, you’re really intellectually involved. You need that mental dynamics and figuring out things. So if it wasn’t for writing books, I’m thinking you’d probably be lost. That’s activity that your mind really needs would not be fulfilled. And similarly, for me, if I’m thinking that I really have deep interest in music and learning music, but just the way my life has been.
I’ve tried to do different things, or I have a need and my skill set for organization. How can I use those talents? Literally sitting down and figuring out and I think that makes a very holistic journey when you try to take all your aspirate favorable aspirations and carve out a path for spirituality for yourself in the support of an institution as a resource. Oh, man. I’ve really enjoyed this conversation, and I’ve learned so much.
Yeah. I’m. I’m just mesmerized by your ability to come up with these acronyms and meaningful acronyms. And, actually, like, what I felt was a question. And I was thinking when Anang was asking this question, how are you going to answer this?
It was okay. And the way you kind of decoded it with the spiritual perspective, the background or the historic perspective, and then your individual take an approach through your realizations. That’s another thing I think a spiritually elevated person is able to do is share his or her realizations. Because when you’re put through situations is when you come up with these wonderful realizations. That’s true.
It touches one’s heart because they’re genuine, and they come for a space of deep realizations, come from a space of experience. So I really enjoyed this conversation. I’m sure our viewers will too. I want to point out that Chetanya Chiran Prabhu has a whole series of question answers that can be found on his channel, his podcast. Spiritualscientist.com.
There’s definitely a link in the chat as well down below. Yeah. We’ll link it in our description. And, thank you so much again for joining us, Chaitanya. Many people were willing to.
I think it was you there. Answered most of my questions. It answered a lot of my questions, so thank you so much for this illuminating talk. Happy to your service. Only at the end of my talks, I do a summary.
Would you like me to do a summary here? Yes, please. Please. So, basically, I think our broad topic was how much or can or should spirituality be institutionalized? Or can we should we need to be a part of the institution to be spiritual?
Today from moment. So then I talk about from my personal perspective how I joined the institution, but after the honeymoon phase, I realized I needed my space. The philosophical perspective, it is that it’s a personal relationship. At the same time, it should be done in association, like a trickle of water flowing toward the ocean. But then that water can be diverted, especially in a very strong.
There has to be vigilance that the now the individual intention is very important to get into the water and stay in the water. And that’s why the institution is more like a resource for the spiritual growth rather than the source of spiritual growth. And when it is relating with the institution, it’s important not to see the institution simply as a one homogeneous entity, but as a set of support groups with each temple or each set of interested people. People with particular interest finding their own community. That that is a philosophical principle of Sanjayati or Sandra.
And then we won’t feel so suffocated. So they could be too extreme in the approach to the institution and talk about electronic one. This is the only way. You cannot be spiritual without institution. In other ways, if you are institutionalized, you get so caught in the power structure that it’s never the way, but rather it’s efficient and effective way.
But how it will be efficient and effective for us, each one of us has to take the responsibility for finding that. And so in institution, in in itself, it needs to be a tangible thing, and that’s why it will have tangible parameters for growth and success. And personal relationship often has intangible parameters. That’s why each individual will have to find the combination of tangible and intangible that works for them according to their nature, their culture, and their particular role in life. And that’s why, again, in like minded association, we find that out.
You know, how much the social identity of being a part of institution translates into psychological identification, their institution. That is something which each individual will need to decide. And for that, we can have the parameters for spiritual growth kept in mind. So, ultimately, that’s on the end of the according to that, spiritual parameter is we we didn’t Krishna and we wanted to feel that so much more that other experiences no longer allure us. So spiritual attachment and material attachment.
And then the institutional parameters will be in terms of how many books distributed, how many people became devotees, how many temples were paid. It will be for individual component, how much funds are raised, how many people cultivated or whatever. Those are important parameters, but each of us needs personal parameters in terms of becoming a better human being, a better person. And we have our issues that we know and others know. And sometimes we may use spiritual bypassing to get away from those issues.
But each one has to individually grow. That’s what 12.132. Rita is not about devotional activities that India went to Krishna. Personal qualities and behavior that India’s went to Krishna. And then finally concluded that the institution is something which we all need for our spiritual growth.
But at the same time, rather than, I mean, mandating, this is the way you have to be in the institution. It’s rather we see we don’t outsource the responsibility of our spiritual advancement to the institution, but rather we take the responsibility. And then from the institution, the association, the support systems, the inspiration, individually, you can grow spiritually, but the motivation may go down. And even if the motivation does not go down, the reciprocation we’re not we are social creatures. The reciprocation may be lost.
So Srila Prabhupad had that in his region when he didn’t call it the international institution of. He wanted to be a society. So there’ll be project builder. There’ll be community builders. And each one of us, according to our particular nature, will find like minded association in a particular ethos, and that’s where we can flourish in our.
Thank you so much. We love your summaries, Fantastic, It’s amazing how you’ve literally summarized everything we spoke about and Yeah. Crucial important points. That’s what happens when you have a brain like that. Yes.
So I only have a good short term memory, not a very good long term memory. That was fantastic. Thank you so much, Prabhu, for your deep Thank you. Gratitude practice. All the very best for your podcast, and Thank you.
I think you we also have a good vibe with each other, and I think we will we’re good if we can continue this podcast, invite more guests, and connect more and more people. I think what talks are more like a vertical way of sharing Krishna consciousness. Podcast become more like a lateral or a horizontal way of yes. It’s osmosis of sharing Krishna consciousness, and we knew that very much. All the very best for your initial.
For the encouragement, Thank you. Thank you so much, Great. Thank you.
The post Is Spirituality Meant to Be Personal or Institutional_ _ A Conversation That Unpacks It All appeared first on The Spiritual Scientist.